On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> Hi there !
>
> Just a quick reminder:
> The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm
> Barcelona (CEST / UTC+2) time.
>
> If you want me to do any announcement tomorrow just when the meeting start
> either send it as
4.5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
Note: the test currently fails which i expected. It passes if i patch
another part in UDSEntry where i'm waiting for a final OK to push.
Cheers,
Mark
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-deve
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Saturday, 2013-09-21, Mark wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just created a quite complicated testcase for frameworks which uses
> > the new signal/slot connection syntax (since Qt 5.0) and uses a lambda as
&g
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Volker Krause wrote:
> On Saturday 21 September 2013 19:18:01 Mark wrote:
> > I've just created a quite complicated testcase for frameworks which uses
> > the new signal/slot connection syntax (since Qt 5.0) and uses a lambda as
> > s
t code in that area is being
developed?
Cheers,
Mark
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
ng, rather than a
> mechanism
> to store and read bookmarks.
>
> Hi Sebas,
If i'm not mistaken, Dolphin is also using KBookmarks. Would your
suggestion keep it alive for dolphin? Or would that mean creating a plugin
that can read/write bookmarks to any file?
Cheers,
Mark
__
. That makes
me wonder, do we still need to port back to q or
are we now going to use the categorized versions: qC?
Cheers,
Mark
[1] http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/qt5-stable/qloggingcategory.html
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-deve
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 October 2013 15:29:56 Mark wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As you all probably know by now, Qt has included of categorized logging
> [1]
> > as of 5.2.
> > In KDE we've had categoriz
InstallDirs
KBookmarks XmlGui Solid KIO)
include_directories(${KF5_INCLUDE_DIRS})
KF5_INCLUDE_DIRS used to contain a bunch of paths a few days ago.
Cheers,
Mark
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org
ong on the wiki link mentioned a couple times
now? Feel free to change it, it's a wiki after all :)
Cheers,
Mark
[1] http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Porting_To_qCDebug
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:39 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 October 2013 21:58:51 Mark wrote:
>> Also, by default when porting to a qCDebug line with a category you
>> won't see log output because custom categories have everything
>> disabled by default.
>
>
thing in kdelibs and to make sure that
it's not just my side..
Cheers,
Mark
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Kurt Hindenburg
wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Mark wrote:
>
> Now you should see a QTreeView with a bunch of entries. However, not
> 50.000 entries! You get to scroll somewhat and you see about 800 -
> 1000 entries in total. But cert
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:42 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 13 October 2013 17:18:28 Mark wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I used to rely on KF5_INCLUDE_DIRS but since a few days that variable seems
>> to be empty. Did i do something wrong?
>>
>> My CMake file for
You "could" make an announcement that people should look into using
the categorized debugging when porting new stuff.
It is now documented on the wiki [1] to get people started. :)
[1] http://community.kde.org/index.php?title=Frameworks/Porting_To_qCDebug
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Kevin Ot
be a collection release (what KDE
SC is now). Press is still getting that wrong, i tend to get it wrong
and other people talking about KDE seem to get it wrong. Usually it's
just being referred to as "KDE 5" which is wrong. (Frameworks 5,
Plasma
re while typing. I hope it's all clear.
Please do give your opinion/input on how we should proceed with this.
Cheers,
Mark
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:31 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2012 23:21:25 Mark wrote:
> > As for "reset to defaults", i don't think that should be stored in a
> > KAction abject. That feature is only usable in the Shortcut Editor
> > (assumpt
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:42 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 11 May 2012 19:57:11 Mark wrote:
> > > KShortcutManager::setDefaultShortcut(newAct, Qt::Key_F6);
> >
> > I like this idea!
>
> Good, me too :-)
>
> > I was actually intending to use the Sho
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Rick Stockton <
rickstock...@reno-computerhelp.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2012 23:21:25 +0200, mark...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Making this quite detailed and long mail as per request from David Faure
>> (twice);)
>>
>> So
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Rick Stockton <
rickstock...@reno-computerhelp.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 May 2012 18:36:42 Mark wrote:
>
> > / As for making a "HIG" keyboard standard list. A very good starting
> > point is:
> />/ http://en.wikipe
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Rick Stockton <
> rickstock...@reno-computerhelp.com> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 12 May 2012 18:36:42 Mark wrote:
>>
>> > / As for making a "HIG" keyboard sta
The following was a conversation between David and me. Sending it to the
list since it belongs there.
On Monday 28 May 2012 17:43:47 Mark wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I've been thinking a bit more about KAction to figure out a way to get rid
> of it completely (along with KShortcut)
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Mark wrote:
> The following was a conversation between David and me. Sending it to the
> list since it belongs there.
>
> On Monday 28 May 2012 17:43:47 Mark wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I've been thinking a bit more about KActi
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:40 AM, David Faure wrote:
> [You keep forgetting to CC kde-frameworks-devel in your replies. Hint: use
> the
> 'A' key in kmail :-)]
>
> Using gmail ;)
I honestly didn't even notice that. Sorry list.
> On Tuesday 12 June 2012 23:59:
pletion is right now. The API
for KCompletion also looks a bit off compared to Qt based API's so
there needs to be a bit of cleaning up in KCompletion as well.
How does that sound to you?
No, i'm not volunteering (yet) to take this one since i have enough on
my todo list as it is :)
Cheers,
Mark
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 01 July 2012 14:07:15 Mark wrote:
>> On a related note for KCompletion vs QCompleter.
>> I don't think the two should merge.
>
> I agree :)
>
>> QCompleter is very UI orientated
>> and
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:47 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 01 July 2012 16:24:51 Mark wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, David Faure wrote:
>> > On Sunday 01 July 2012 14:07:15 Mark wrote:
>> >> On a related note for KCompletion vs QCompleter.
>> &
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
> (putting back plasma-devel on CC, since the discussion is quite relevant)
>
> 2012/9/17 Sune Vuorela :
>>> I know Sune already had some plans for the notification stack and I
>>> think that's one of the best times for discussing what's going
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
>> (putting back plasma-devel on CC, since the discussion is quite relevant)
>>
>> 2012/9/17 Sune Vuorela :
>>>> I know Sune already had some plans for the no
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Jon Severinsson wrote:
> QDate in Qt5 now supports dates before 4712 BCE (new limit is
> 12626108195557530 BCE, well outside the limit of a four digit year).
> ---
> This fixes test #12: kdecore-kdatetimetest when building on Qt5. I choose to
> just rip it out rat
those cases as well with the changes i mentioned above and it greatly
simplifies the API's, likely greatly reduced memory cost, greatly
reduced CPU cost and just a lot more scalable for bigger file systems.
Perhaps we can deprecate the current KDirModel, KDirLister, UDSEntry
and UDSEn
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:44 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 28 December 2012 02:50:53 Mark wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> -- Be sure to read all of this (long!) mail or parts won't make sense! --
>> -- cross posting to frameworks and KCD since it concerns both --
>
&g
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Volker Krause wrote:
> On Saturday 29 December 2012 11:44:20 David Faure wrote:
>> On Friday 28 December 2012 02:50:53 Mark wrote:
>> > Another thing is the "UDS_EXTRA" and "UDS_EXTRA_END". I
>> > seriously dou
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:41 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2013 15:52:23 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> Le lundi 31 décembre 2012 11:43:47 David Faure a écrit :
>> [snip]
>>
>> > If you want to think "bigger redesign", one could consider adding the
>> > necessary API to KDirModel so tha
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:51 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2013 11:15:20 Mark wrote:
>> A little more in depth questions for KDirLister and KFileItem. In my
>> profiling KFileItem ends up high due to various reasons, but
>> KDirLister is also a bit of a heav
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Frank Reininghaus
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/1/9 Mark:
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:51 PM, David Faure wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 09 January 2013 11:15:20 Mark wrote:
>>>> A little more in depth questions for KDirLister and KFileItem. In
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:30:35 Mark wrote:
>> very rapidly, the actual view is still barely usable as long as files
>> are dripping in. This is the same in QML (ListView) as in QWidgets
>> The issue here is
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 14:12:30 you wrote:
>> part very rapidly. No issue thus far. But when i start scrolling
>> _while_ the data is dripping in it's ... not very responsive.
>
> after a quick look:
>
> the DirModel is doing all the
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 16:49:15 you wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> > * DirModel::updatePreview calls setData for each preview that it gets
>> > back.
>> > that causes dataChanged to be emitted. ag
ivate"
would inherit from QAbstractItemModel where KDirModel itself would
inherit from probably QObject.
..?
Or would the KDirModel need to inherit from QThread?
Just something i wonder because setModel(QAbstractItemModel * model)
needs a class that's subclassing QAbstractItemModel whic
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Le mercredi 9 janvier 2013 16:42:25 Mark a écrit :
>
>> Dolphin happens to be a big user here, but i'm really not talking
>> about dolphin specifically. The structures behind it are my target :)
>> Filtering w
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Le mardi 15 janvier 2013 16:04:39 Mark a écrit :
>
>> Well, sorting is very fast now (in my test environment) and fast
>> enough for "regular" data to be sorted before you see the data. That's
>> n
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:25 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2013 17:14:52 Mark wrote:
>> We're talking about application level now. In other terms: off topic
>> ;)
>
> Not completely.
> It's good to decide on an overall direction for a given
dget".
I'm guessing Qt5 won't be ready for full fledged desktop application -
as you would expect a desktop application - before Qt 5.2 or perhaps
even 5.3.
Aaron, do you have any news regarding that DirModel of yours and Marco
that is threaded? I would be very interested in using t
R E P L Y to all ^_- You keep forgetting it, don't you?
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2013 20:18:03 you wrote:
>> I'm guessing Qt5 won't be ready for full fledged desktop application -
>
> maybe you wouldn't say that if you'd seen the QML Desktop
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2013 21:09:59 you wrote:
>> - RMB context menu
>> - App wide shortcuts
>> - Clipboard integration..
>
> these are all being worked on.
Gladly :) But as said.. Qt 5.2 or even 5.3 material. Certainly not 5.1.
>
>> In my
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> On Monday, January 21, 2013 21:09:59 you wrote:
>>> - RMB context menu
>>> - App wide shortcuts
>>> - Clipboard integration..
>>
>> these ar
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Frank Reininghaus
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> 2013/2/4 Mark:
>> I really really really dislike KDirModel and friends (KDirLister,
>> KFileItem).
>
> before you get even more emotional in your next reply to this thread,
> please consider
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Frank Reininghaus
> wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> 2013/2/4 Mark:
>>> I really really really dislike KDirModel and friends (KDirLister,
>>> KFileItem).
>>
>> before
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:19 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2013 09:01:21 Mark wrote:
>> The thing i'm puzzling most with right now is how i can optimize
>> UDSEntry. Internally it's a hash and that very visible in profiling.
>> Also in KFileIte
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:47 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2013 11:05:35 Mark wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:19 AM, David Faure
> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 05 February 2013 09:01:21 Mark wrote:
>> >> The thing i'm puzzling mos
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Rick Stockton
wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 12:17 AM, Mark wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Michail Vourlakos
>> wrote:
>>> Based on
>>> http://kdeblog.mageprojects.com/2012/12/07/application-wide-shortcuts-in-qml-this-time-w
es so i
simply don't have the time this month. I will next month because of
transition time between jobs.
Someone wise once told me: "You should dive into KIO, it can be really
rewarding!" (looking at you, David ^_-)
Cheers,
Mark
[1] http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/Splitting
** ahh, so we're continuing in this message after all instead of "KIO
progress towards tier 1 framework? (resend)". **
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:06 PM, David Faure wrote:
> Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 13:49:01 Mark a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> When i'm looking in
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:47 PM, John Layt wrote:
>>
>> On 19 July 2013 14:15, Aleix Pol wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I was looking at that task in the Qt5 epics list and I didn't
>> >> un
r: Kevin Ottens
Date: Thu Jul 25 08:16:28 2013 +0200
Add KDE4Attic, KUnitConversion and KIO to the staging list
Cheers,
Mark
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Mark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed the exact instructions from here:
> http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Building
>
> my .bashrc looks like:
> export KF5=/home/kde-devel/kf5
> export QTDIR=/home/kde-devel/qt5dev/qtbase
> expo
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> until recently I thought I was still the maintainer of the buildsystem for
> KDE4 and also KF5, but I think the consensus on this list here is that Stephen
> has taken over this role.
> So I'll let him do that, and stay out of t
ally have make_unique in C++14, but still find
some "custom created" make_unique version called d_ptr. People will
undoubtedly want to replace it with the proper C++14 call. Please lets
just try to prevent that situation.
I hope i didn't offend you.
Cheers,
Mark
[1] http://isocpp.org/f
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
>
>> The paper that describes make_unique - and contains an implementation
>> - can be found here [1]. For reference, the full code to have
>> make_unique ready to paste in any file is here [2].
>
> Make unique is only a method to create a std::un
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been working on Purpose since some months now, with the intention
> of becoming a framework some day. Some information about it can be
> read here:
>
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/libs/purpose/repository/revisions/mast
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126231/#review89077
---
+1
- Mark Gaiser
On dec 3, 2015, 8:37 a.m., Xuetian Weng
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> I've been working on Purpose since some months now, with the intention
&g
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> based on the discussion in [1] I propose that we split out platformtheme
> plugin from frameworkintegration into a dedicated repository and move it to
> kde/workspace to be released together with Plasma 5.6.
>
> The main reason
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Monday, December 7, 2015 3:54:31 PM CET Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > While at it. Why does frameworkintegration force [1] specific fonts upon
> > the user?
> >
> > It's fine that apparently some folks prefer O
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 5:05:33 PM CET Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > It's not that black and white though. There are much more desktop
> > environments out there. Specifically (but not only) those that are also
> &
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 6:03:47 PM CET Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > I thought the frameworkintegration plugin was exactly that and usable for
> > any platform if they wish to use it.
> > Or is my assumption wrong and
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 4:03:24 PM CET Aleix Pol wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Graesslin
> wrote:
> > >> On Tuesday
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> On Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:54:15 AM CET Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Martin Graesslin
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 4:03:24 PM CET Aleix Pol wrote:
&g
oks ok" to me.
If nobody objects within - lets say 3 days - then just ship it.
- Mark Gaiser
On dec 4, 2015, 6:23 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.r
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 10 December 2015, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > It's not just a barrier in my head. It's a waste of resources if one
> > package that doesn't need a dozen dependencies, pulls it in because
> someone
>
mode.
Which is exactly what you want, should still be working in a cross platform
manner and gives you the optimizations you initially had without the issue you
had, right?
Just my 2 cents :)
- Mark Gaiser
On mrt 15, 2016, 1:52 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2016 23:14:36 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El diumenge, 20 de març de 2016, a les 10:12:14 CET, David Faure va
> escriure:
> > > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:16:05 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > IIRC, the
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>> Hey everyone :)
>>
>> It is time to get ready for GSoC 2014. It's another great chance to
>> get some large projects done this year and welcome new enthusiastic
>> people to KDE. I a
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>> >> Hey everyone :)
>>
814e3d512ae37278feb57738f5fdc9&hp=8fb14bba0ca3983cb3503ea780c66b932816a1a1&hb=f9e5cc949ff3719ec553955fba09f4efbc189c07&f=CMakeLists.txt
- Mark Gaiser
On Feb. 10, 2014, 11:53 a.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an au
Done:
http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas#Revive_KioFuse.2C_fuse_support_for_KIO
Lets hope a student comes by and picks that project :)
All we need then is someone to mentor that.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Aleix Pol wr
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> On Monday, February 10, 2014 01:54:36 PM Mark Gaiser wrote:
>> Done:
>> http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas#Revive_KioFuse.2C_fuse_support_for
>> _KIO
>>
>> Lets hope a student comes by and picks that
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote:
>> Hi there !
>>
>> It is time we decide when to organize the Frameworks sprint, the main
>> objective of this sprint is "Making it releseable".
>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> We finally have a date for the sprint, next step is to know how many people
> need sponsoring, so please register yourself here:
>
> https://sprints.kde.org/sprint/224
>
> I want to send the budget somewhere next week so please, hurry!
>
> Tha
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:28 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:58:09 Mark Gaiser wrote:
>> I only filled in April 3rd since that makes worth to stay in barcelona
>> after the pim sprint.
>
> Strange way of using doodle. Red is supposed to mean "im
(
> Is there anything else on the page that interests you?
>
> Mark: Please remove the idea from the wiki.
Done.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey,
>
> not sure this is the right list. I noticed that kdesrc-build happily continues
> building even when a module failed to build. Is this desired? I find it highly
> unintuitive, esp. as most modules failing at the beginning will mean al
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> If you didn't yet, please register for the upcoming sprint:
> https://sprints.kde.org/sprint/224
>
> Especially if you're not from Barcelona, it's necessary for budgeting the
> sprint, booking the accommodation, etc. The guys in
tps://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116998/#comment37842>
iconurl = QUrl::fromLocalFile(xmldata.attribute("icon"));
Or am i missing something obvious now?
- Mark Gaiser
On March 25, 2014, 2:37 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
>
> --
ell for listing entries, but i don't know if this works as a
test case.
- Mark Gaiser
On March 26, 2014, 12:13 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically gener
home
dir. You new code is certainly doing that. I don't know exactly what the old
case was doing here.
What was it doing?
- Mark Gaiser
On March 26, 2014, 11:16 a.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
>
> ---
> This is
> On March 26, 2014, 12:57 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > src/widgets/kpropertiesdialog.cpp, line 3444
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117078/diff/2/?file=257291#file257291line3444>
> >
> > If you change it anyway, you might as well go for C++11:
&g
> On March 26, 2014, 12:39 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > autotests/kdirmodeltest.cpp, lines 55-56
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117080/diff/1/?file=257310#file257310line55>
> >
> > Do you really have to make defines for those signals? Sure, it look
del. The models that i describe in the wiki page are
_not_ comparable to KDirModel, but you probably can implement a
KDirModel with my "DirListModel" class.
I'm looking forward to all your feedback.
Best regards,
Mark
Wiki page: http://techbase.kde.org/Use
case default:
m_file
break;
I like your test! Looks a lot like the one i wrote for the view mode :)
+1 from me after the default case is implemented.
- Mark Gaiser
On May 3, 2014, 3:27 p.m., David Rosca wrote:
>
> --
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 1:41 PM, David Faure wrote:
> Git commit 23d81eb86ae45828f8a56d2b0447de0a0f20aa86 by David Faure.
> Committed on 04/05/2014 at 11:40.
> Pushed by dfaure into branch 'master'.
>
> Reimplement sibling(), faster than the default impl which goes via parent()
>
> It wasn't virtua
tps://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118071/#comment40114>
You have a double ";;" ;)
- Mark Gaiser
On May 10, 2014, 1:57 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> htt
rent SlaveBase::send function. That is executed
in the same thread as the slave thus will still block IO time while
sending a batch. I think i need to move this in the worker thread as
well, right?
I'm looking forward to your feedback.
Cheers,
Mark
_
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Frank Reininghaus
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> 2014-05-11 21:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Gaiser:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been playing with KIO speed improvements for quite a while now
>> and found some very interesting issues with KIO in combinat
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:55 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 11 May 2014 21:57:58 Mark Gaiser wrote:
>> My theoretical solution (and i really hope to get feedback on this) is
>> to introduce a worker thread in slavebase.cpp.
>
> First feedback: threads create complexity
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Monday 12 May 2014 12:34:33 Mark Gaiser wrote:
>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:55 AM, David Faure wrote:
>> > On Sunday 11 May 2014 21:57:58 Mark Gaiser wrote:
>> >> My theoretical solution (and i really ho
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday, May 11, 2014 21:57:58 Mark Gaiser wrote:
>> Note: my recent incremental cleanups already made it about a second
>> faster then it used to be. It used to be around 5.500ms. However, the
>> current speed is
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2014 18:31:06 Aleix Pol wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've been getting some error messages [1] from some QML applications and I
>> decided to investigate a bit further. I realized then that most of it was
>> coming from the KIOAccessMan
1 - 100 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
