> On Feb. 12, 2017, 8:13 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > "Qt doesn't do this" = Qt doesn't strip '&' from action texts in toolbars?
> > I can't confirm that.
> >
> > With this patch and my kxmlgui patch reverted, I get "Open File (F)" and
> > "Print (P)" in the konqueror toolbar, and Alt+F opens
> On Feb. 12, 2017, 8:13 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > "Qt doesn't do this" = Qt doesn't strip '&' from action texts in toolbars?
> > I can't confirm that.
> >
> > With this patch and my kxmlgui patch reverted, I get "Open File (F)" and
> > "Print (P)" in the konqueror toolbar, and Alt+F opens
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129663/#review102508
---
"Qt doesn't do this" = Qt doesn't strip '&' from action text
> On Jan. 29, 2017, 7:32 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Actually, Alt+letter for actions in toolbars doesn't work anymore. I
> > *think* it worked long ago, when e.g. konqueror's toolbars had
> > &Location: [URL LineEdit]
> >
> > But re-reading the comment, that is exactly the point: no accel f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129663/#review102317
---
Actually, Alt+letter for actions in toolbars doesn't work an
> On Dec. 17, 2016, 11:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that
> > KAcceleratorManager needs to be told, to avoid the infinite loop.
> >
> > However the reason for this code still holds I think, so it seems to me
> > that it needs to be improv
> On Dec. 17, 2016, 11:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that
> > KAcceleratorManager needs to be told, to avoid the infinite loop.
> >
> > However the reason for this code still holds I think, so it seems to me
> > that it needs to be improv
> On Dec. 17, 2016, 11:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that
> > KAcceleratorManager needs to be told, to avoid the infinite loop.
> >
> > However the reason for this code still holds I think, so it seems to me
> > that it needs to be improv
> On Dec. 17, 2016, 11:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that
> > KAcceleratorManager needs to be told, to avoid the infinite loop.
> >
> > However the reason for this code still holds I think, so it seems to me
> > that it needs to be improv
> On Dec. 17, 2016, 11:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that
> > KAcceleratorManager needs to be told, to avoid the infinite loop.
> >
> > However the reason for this code still holds I think, so it seems to me
> > that it needs to be improv
> On Dec. 17, 2016, 11:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that
> > KAcceleratorManager needs to be told, to avoid the infinite loop.
> >
> > However the reason for this code still holds I think, so it seems to me
> > that it needs to be improv
> On Dec. 17, 2016, 11:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that
> > KAcceleratorManager needs to be told, to avoid the infinite loop.
> >
> > However the reason for this code still holds I think, so it seems to me
> > that it needs to be improv
> On Dec. 17, 2016, 11:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that
> > KAcceleratorManager needs to be told, to avoid the infinite loop.
> >
> > However the reason for this code still holds I think, so it seems to me
> > that it needs to be improv
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129663/#review101488
---
I agree that doing this in Show is far too late - and that K
14 matches
Mail list logo
