On Tuesday 23 July 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Saturday 20 July 2013 03:12:25 Vishesh Handa wrote:
...
> > Also, under what folder name should there includes be installed?
> > Currently the fancy includes are installed in a KDE folder
> > (/include/KDE/fancyHeaders). Do we want to continue with
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:15:52 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 July 2013 10:05:59 Benjamin Port wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:49:48 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > The ideal situation would be to get them generated, but I don't think
> > > anyone put the work in yet.
> >
> > Yes,
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 10:05:59 Benjamin Port wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:49:48 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > The ideal situation would be to get them generated, but I don't think
> > anyone put the work in yet.
>
> Yes, I think we need to find a way to generate fancy header. But we probab
On 23/07/13 09:05, Benjamin Port wrote:
> IMO we need to have subdirectory because we can't be sure that we don't have
> 2
> headers with the same name in 2 differents frameworks.
Except that if we did, that would suggest we had a class name duplicated
across two frameworks, which would cause is
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:49:48 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Saturday 20 July 2013 03:12:25 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > I've been looking at the frameworks branch and I cannot help but
> > notice that there is an 'include' folder which contains all the fancy
> > headers. Is there any pol
Hello,
On Saturday 20 July 2013 03:12:25 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> I've been looking at the frameworks branch and I cannot help but
> notice that there is an 'include' folder which contains all the fancy
> headers. Is there any policy on what needs to be done about it?
>
> Some of the fancy headers,
