Hello, On Saturday 20 July 2013 03:12:25 Vishesh Handa wrote: > I've been looking at the frameworks branch and I cannot help but > notice that there is an 'include' folder which contains all the fancy > headers. Is there any policy on what needs to be done about it? > > Some of the fancy headers, such as the Nepomuk ones, should just be > discarded. > > Should the others be moved to their respective frameworks in a special > include folder? So 'include/Solid/*' would move to > 'tier1/solid/includes/' ?
The ideal situation would be to get them generated, but I don't think anyone put the work in yet. > Also, under what folder name should there includes be installed? > Currently the fancy includes are installed in a KDE folder > (/include/KDE/fancyHeaders). Do we want to continue with that? Or just > install them in the specific folder. Eg - Solid headers would now be > installed in include/Solid/ instead of include/KDE/Solid/ I see no problem having them still installed in a KDE folder. Maybe we want that to become KF5 though to help with co-installation of major versions. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net Sponsored by BlueSystems and KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
