Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-07-07 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Saturday, 2 July 2016 12:23:31 CEST David Faure wrote: > > [...] > > We still need to handle the migration when/if the user installs > > FrameworksIntegration no? Suddenly all his MessageBoxes will be back > > without any apparent reason. > > True. Although this feels like a corner case

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-07-06 Thread David Faure
On mercredi 6 juillet 2016 00:26:39 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I'm wondering if the best option wouldn't to ask all packagers to make > > kwidgetsaddons depend on frameworkintegration. Everything else leads to > > breakage. > > That effectively breaks the tier of kwidgetsaddons to be "Tier

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-07-05 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dissabte, 2 de juliol de 2016, a les 12:23:31 CEST, David Faure va escriure: > On mercredi 15 juin 2016 00:33:40 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dimarts, 14 de juny de 2016, a les 10:57:19 CEST, David Faure va > > escriure: > > > On mardi 14 juin 2016 01:00:09 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-07-02 Thread David Faure
On mercredi 15 juin 2016 00:33:40 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimarts, 14 de juny de 2016, a les 10:57:19 CEST, David Faure va escriure: > > On mardi 14 juin 2016 01:00:09 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El dilluns, 13 de juny de 2016, a les 11:27:53 CEST, David Faure va > > > > escriu

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-14 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimarts, 14 de juny de 2016, a les 10:57:19 CEST, David Faure va escriure: > On mardi 14 juin 2016 01:00:09 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dilluns, 13 de juny de 2016, a les 11:27:53 CEST, David Faure va > > escriure: > > > On dimanche 12 juin 2016 22:58:34 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: >

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-14 Thread David Faure
On mardi 14 juin 2016 01:00:09 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dilluns, 13 de juny de 2016, a les 11:27:53 CEST, David Faure va escriure: > > On dimanche 12 juin 2016 22:58:34 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El diumenge, 12 de juny de 2016, a les 20:29:56 CEST, Christoph Cullmann > > > va >

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-13 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dilluns, 13 de juny de 2016, a les 11:27:53 CEST, David Faure va escriure: > On dimanche 12 juin 2016 22:58:34 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El diumenge, 12 de juny de 2016, a les 20:29:56 CEST, Christoph Cullmann > > va > > > > escriure: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Having KMessageBox "dontSho

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-13 Thread David Faure
On dimanche 12 juin 2016 22:58:34 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 12 de juny de 2016, a les 20:29:56 CEST, Christoph Cullmann va > > escriure: > > Hi, > > > > > Having KMessageBox "dontShowMeAgain" feature depend on an integration > > > plugin is a very bad idea. > > > > > > Basical

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El diumenge, 12 de juny de 2016, a les 20:29:56 CEST, Christoph Cullmann va escriure: > Hi, > > > Having KMessageBox "dontShowMeAgain" feature depend on an integration > > plugin is a very bad idea. > > > > Basically it means programs that use KMessageBox can never asusme it will > > work so bas

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-12 Thread Mark Gaiser
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Having KMessageBox "dontShowMeAgain" feature depend on an integration > plugin > is a very bad idea. > > Basically it means programs that use KMessageBox can never asusme it will > work > so basically they have to use alternative methods

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El diumenge, 12 de juny de 2016, a les 20:38:28 CEST, Hugo Pereira Da Costa va escriure: > On 06/12/2016 07:51 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Having KMessageBox "dontShowMeAgain" feature depend on an integration > > plugin is a very bad idea. > > > > Basically it means programs that use KMessag

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-12 Thread Boudhayan Gupta
On 13 June 2016 at 00:08, Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > On 06/12/2016 07:51 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> >> Having KMessageBox "dontShowMeAgain" feature depend on an integration >> plugin >> is a very bad idea. >> >> Basically it means programs that use KMessageBox can never asusme it will >>

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-12 Thread Hugo Pereira Da Costa
On 06/12/2016 07:51 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Having KMessageBox "dontShowMeAgain" feature depend on an integration plugin is a very bad idea. Basically it means programs that use KMessageBox can never asusme it will work so basically they have to use alternative methods to have the "dontShow

Re: KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-12 Thread Christoph Cullmann
Hi, > Having KMessageBox "dontShowMeAgain" feature depend on an integration plugin > is a very bad idea. > > Basically it means programs that use KMessageBox can never asusme it will work > so basically they have to use alternative methods to have the > "dontShowMeAgain" feature or not have it at

KMessageBox runtime dependency on FrameworkIntegrationPlugin makes it useless

2016-06-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Having KMessageBox "dontShowMeAgain" feature depend on an integration plugin is a very bad idea. Basically it means programs that use KMessageBox can never asusme it will work so basically they have to use alternative methods to have the "dontShowMeAgain" feature or not have it at all. I under