David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2016 13:54:02 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>
>> Why doesn't v5.21.0 tag the d2e7c78c94e6 commit directly instead?
>
> Don't know.
>
> I just call git tag, then git does its magic.
>
> cat $here/modules.git | while read repo branch; do
> echo $repo
> . $
On Friday 22 April 2016 23:51:51 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Friday April 22 2016 23:33:27 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> > Looks like I'm going to have to add output to kio_http and see if the error
> > message doesn't come from an error==ENOENT returned from a failed function
> > call. Seems lik
On Sunday 24 April 2016 13:54:02 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
> Why doesn't v5.21.0 tag the d2e7c78c94e6 commit directly instead?
Don't know.
I just call git tag, then git does its magic.
cat $here/modules.git | while read repo branch; do
echo $repo
. $here/version
tagname=v$version
v
On Saturday, April 23, 2016 8:48:17 PM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 1:09:00 PM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Vrátil wrote:
> >> > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 1:44:16 AM
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dilluns, 25 d’abril de 2016, a les 9:05:58 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pyne wrote:
>> > On Sat, April 23, 2016 13:09:00 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Danie
El dilluns, 25 d’abril de 2016, a les 9:05:58 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pyne wrote:
> > On Sat, April 23, 2016 13:09:00 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Vrátil wrote:
> >> > any chance to get this patch into our Qt
dfaure added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D1465
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: dfaure, Frameworks
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@
2016-04-22 12:45 GMT+02:00 Harald Sitter :
> Lost mailing list CC, I am assuming that was intentional? (:
Oops, no - I didn't see the CC and didn't hit reply-all then...
Adding the list back (hope your reply isn't private ;-) ), the mail I
sent first is below.
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:21 PM, M
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Sat, April 23, 2016 13:09:00 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Vrátil wrote:
>> > any chance to get this patch into our Qt build on the CI since it has been
>> > integrated upstream now? As it affects all test
> On April 24, 2016, 1:57 nachm., David Faure wrote:
> > Better, but I'm still wary of the reentrancy due to the nested event loop
> > usage.
> >
> > I bet this leads to a complete deadlock:
> >
> > QTimer::singleShot(0, this, SLOT(launchConversion()));
> > launchConversion();
> >
> >
GENERAL INFO
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kservice%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/18/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:56:40 +
Build duration: 1.9 sec
CHANGE SET
No changes
_
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kglobalaccel%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/16/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:56:40 +
Build duration: 1 min 9 sec
CHANGE SET
No changes
JUNIT RESULTS
Name: (
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127251/#review94808
---
Better, but I'm still wary of the reentrancy due to the neste
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127251/
---
(Updated April 24, 2016, 1:26 nachm.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks a
If you look in gitk at karchive (or any other repo), you can see that commit
d2e7c78c94e6 is tagged with both v5.21.0-rc2 and v5.21.0.
If you click on the v5.21.0-rc2 tag, you can see that it tags the commit.
That is the usual thing to do.
Tag: v5.21.0-rc2
object d2e7c78c94e629a60bcff7b5c1abaf
15 matches
Mail list logo
