On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pyne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, April 23, 2016 13:09:00 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> wrote: >> > any chance to get this patch into our Qt build on the CI since it has been >> > integrated upstream now? As it affects all tests that interact with DBus >> > it >> > would be nice to resolve this on the CI. >> >> We'll need upstream to update qt5.git (I think that's still required >> for changes to fully flow through) I think. >> We could try to hack the patch in, but then we'll end up having to >> undo that in a few weeks time. > > If we're talking about Qt commit 1b9d082b, that appears to already be in the > 5.6 branch (though not dev). I'm not sure which the CI uses though, if it's > not 5.6 or less then it is probably more work than its worth to try to > downgrade (something I've run into too much myself).
The CI system uses the 5.6 branch, from qt5.git. I've now triggered a build, but as qt5.git hasn't been updated since our last build I have no idea whether this will pull the relevant commit in. > > Regards, > - Michael Pyne Cheers, Ben _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
