Good afternoon,
[Please keep sysad...@kde.org list or bs...@kde.org in the CC for
replies]
I want to clarify some bits for which we have gotten a questions about,
- Non unique naming: There's some teams which prefer if we dropped the
namespace- part from their name which we have added. While c
Is it possible for someone to
port Quanta away from DCOP at least?
Your quanta was singularly the best html editor
I had found. It now does not work without a
dcopserver. I wish there was a way to use it
without that. It helped me make simple,
great-looking web pages. These days, I am
not real
Hi,
I looked at the quanta repo and it looks unlikely Quanta
will be ported to modern system since it doesn't even
looks like the Qt4 port was finished.
I tried looking for information on the internet but I didn't
find anything that made Quanta so special. If you are doing
php websites maybe you c
If I'm understanding things, we have solutions to most or all of the
objections raised so far:
- Projects will be allowed to live in--or at least appear in--multiple
top-level groups (e.g. plasma-framework could appear in both the
Frameworks top-level group and also the Plasma top-level group)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:25 PM Bhushan Shah wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> [Please keep sysad...@kde.org list or bs...@kde.org in the CC for
> replies]
>
> I want to clarify some bits for which we have gotten a questions about,
>
> - Non unique naming: There's some teams which prefer if we dropp
On 4/30/20 11:43 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
IMHO needing tools ad-hoc to KDE development can be a barrier of entrance.
I feel like these things make us look distant, it's important that
people's skills translate automatically when they want to get started.
True, but if you're a new contributor, pr
> We have made a big fuss in the past about having different projects
> that do the same thing and now we'll have that but also we'll have
> several projects with the same name?
> It really feels off to me and I wonder if this is related to the move to
> gitlab.
+1 to both sentiments - that projec
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 5:44 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:25 PM Bhushan Shah wrote:
> >
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > [Please keep sysad...@kde.org list or bs...@kde.org in the CC for
> > replies]
> >
> > I want to clarify some bits for which we have gotten a questions about,
>
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:04 AM Ivan Čukić wrote:
>
> > We have made a big fuss in the past about having different projects
> > that do the same thing and now we'll have that but also we'll have
> > several projects with the same name?
> > It really feels off to me and I wonder if this is related t
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 5:58 AM Nate Graham wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/30/20 11:43 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > IMHO needing tools ad-hoc to KDE development can be a barrier of entrance.
> > I feel like these things make us look distant, it's important that
> > people's skills translate automatically when the
Hello folks, we have a project about porting a QtQuickControls module to
QtQuickControls2 with only one mentor who marked "I want to mentor" on the
GSoC webapp.
If you have already signed into the GSoC webapp as a mentor, and would like
to help out with this project, please mark "I want to mentor"
Le 30/04/2020 à 21:38, Valorie Zimmerman a écrit :
> Hello folks, we have a project about porting a QtQuickControls module
> to QtQuickControls2 with only one mentor who marked "I want to mentor"
> on the GSoC webapp.
>
> If you have already signed into the GSoC webapp as a mentor, and would
> like
Le 30/04/2020 à 22:07, Timothée Giet a écrit :
> Le 30/04/2020 à 21:38, Valorie Zimmerman a écrit :
>> Hello folks, we have a project about porting a QtQuickControls module
>> to QtQuickControls2 with only one mentor who marked "I want to
>> mentor" on the GSoC webapp.
>>
>> If you have already sig
El dijous, 30 d’abril de 2020, a les 21:31:02 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:04 AM Ivan Čukić wrote:
> >
> > > We have made a big fuss in the past about having different projects
> > > that do the same thing and now we'll have that but also we'll have
> > > several proj
> On 30 April 2020 21:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Am I the only person that just has all the repos on the same folder? I
> thought it was the common thing to do :?
Me too.
I think that there is no solution to group repositories by purpose category.
There is too much overlap, and there may
El jue., 30 de abr. de 2020 a la(s) 18:15, Albert Astals Cid
(aa...@kde.org) escribió:
>
> El dijous, 30 d’abril de 2020, a les 21:31:02 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:04 AM Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > >
> > > > We have made a big fuss in the past about having different pro
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 1:08 AM Nicolás Alvarez
wrote:
>
> El jue., 30 de abr. de 2020 a la(s) 18:15, Albert Astals Cid
> (aa...@kde.org) escribió:
> >
> > El dijous, 30 d’abril de 2020, a les 21:31:02 CEST, Ben Cooksley va
> > escriure:
> > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:04 AM Ivan Čukić wrote:
> >
On 4/30/20 5:59 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
El jue., 30 de abr. de 2020 a la(s) 18:15, Albert Astals Cid
Am I the only person that just has all the repos on the same folder? I thought
it was the common thing to do :?
I do too
Same here. kdesrc-build's default settings do this, and download all
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:46 AM Nate Graham wrote:
>
> If I'm understanding things, we have solutions to most or all of the
> objections raised so far:
>
> - Projects will be allowed to live in--or at least appear in--multiple
> top-level groups (e.g. plasma-framework could appear in both the
> Fra
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:38 PM Nate Graham wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/30/20 5:59 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > El jue., 30 de abr. de 2020 a la(s) 18:15, Albert Astals Cid
> >> Am I the only person that just has all the repos on the same folder? I
> >> thought it was the common thing to do :?
> >
> > I do to
20 matches
Mail list logo
