Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-06-03 Thread christoph
On 2024-06-03 15:38, Albert Vaca Cintora wrote: I created a task for KDE Connect to not require DBus on Windows/MacOS [1]. I agree using DBus is not great, but it's not an easy change to make and we have a total of zero developers on those platforms. [1] https://invent.kde.org/network/kdeconnec

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-06-03 Thread Albert Vaca Cintora
I created a task for KDE Connect to not require DBus on Windows/MacOS [1]. I agree using DBus is not great, but it's not an easy change to make and we have a total of zero developers on those platforms. [1] https://invent.kde.org/network/kdeconnect-meta/-/issues/23

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-27 Thread christoph
On 2024-05-27 14:55, Carl Schwan wrote: On Saturday, May 25, 2024 1:02:41 PM Central European Summer Time christ...@cullmann.io wrote: Hi, Thanks, you were faster than me. Now that frameworks is QDBus free on Windows and macOS I would even propose that in a next update of the stuff we really n

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-27 Thread Carl Schwan
On Saturday, May 25, 2024 1:02:41 PM Central European Summer Time christ...@cullmann.io wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, you were faster than me. > > Now that frameworks is QDBus free on Windows and macOS I would even > propose that in a next update of the stuff we really not have QtDBus > around at all

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-27 Thread christoph
On 2024-05-27 14:34, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 14:26 +0200, christ...@cullmann.io wrote: On 2024-05-27 14:01, Ralf Habacker wrote: > There is e.g. the remote control area which is implemented in KDE > applications with dbus. Should we now use a separate implementation >

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-27 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 14:26 +0200, christ...@cullmann.io wrote: > On 2024-05-27 14:01, Ralf Habacker wrote: > > > There is e.g. the remote control area which is implemented in KDE > > applications with dbus. Should we now use a separate implementation > > for > > each platform with additional ef

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-27 Thread christoph
On 2024-05-27 14:01, Ralf Habacker wrote: Am 26.05.24 um 11:42 schrieb christ...@cullmann.io: For the re-use of instances you need to use something like https://github.com/KDAB/KDSingleApplication or similar. Any implicit starting of the dbus stuff will often just result in hangs or other

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-27 Thread Ralf Habacker
Am 26.05.24 um 11:42 schrieb christ...@cullmann.io: For the re-use of instances you need to use something like https://github.com/KDAB/KDSingleApplication or similar. Any implicit starting of the dbus stuff will often just result in hangs or other misbehavior. DBus on Windows starts automat

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-26 Thread christoph
On 2024-05-26 11:42, christ...@cullmann.io wrote: On 2024-05-26 10:49, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: On Sat, 25 May 2024 13:02:41 +0200 christ...@cullmann.io wrote: Now that frameworks is QDBus free on Windows and macOS I would even propose that in a next update of the stuff we really not have

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-26 Thread christoph
On 2024-05-26 10:49, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: On Sat, 25 May 2024 13:02:41 +0200 christ...@cullmann.io wrote: Now that frameworks is QDBus free on Windows and macOS I would even propose that in a next update of the stuff we really not have QtDBus around at all on these systems and make the

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-26 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
On Sat, 25 May 2024 13:02:41 +0200 christ...@cullmann.io wrote: > Now that frameworks is QDBus free on Windows and macOS I would even > propose that in a next update of the stuff we really not have QtDBus > around at all on these systems and make the use optional for the apps > that want to supp

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-25 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 12:22 AM wrote: > On 2024-05-25 10:06, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Samstag, 25. Mai 2024 05:40:26 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Been looking into what is needed to migrate Windows CI over to Qt 6.7 > >> this > >> afternoon and alas have run into a few roa

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-25 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 10:52 PM wrote: > On 2024-05-25 05:40, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Been looking into what is needed to migrate Windows CI over to Qt 6.7 > > this afternoon and alas have run into a few roadblocks, related to > > QDBusConnection. > > > > https://invent.kde.org/s

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-25 Thread christoph
On 2024-05-25 10:06, Volker Krause wrote: On Samstag, 25. Mai 2024 05:40:26 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, Been looking into what is needed to migrate Windows CI over to Qt 6.7 this afternoon and alas have run into a few roadblocks, related to QDBusConnection. https://invent.kde.org/sysadm

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-25 Thread christoph
On 2024-05-25 05:40, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, Been looking into what is needed to migrate Windows CI over to Qt 6.7 this afternoon and alas have run into a few roadblocks, related to QDBusConnection. https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-management/-/jobs/1848501 https://invent.kde.org/sysadmi

Re: Migrating Windows CI to Qt 6.7 - Roadblocks

2024-05-25 Thread Volker Krause
On Samstag, 25. Mai 2024 05:40:26 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > Been looking into what is needed to migrate Windows CI over to Qt 6.7 this > afternoon and alas have run into a few roadblocks, related to > QDBusConnection. > > https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-management/-/jobs/1848501 >