Hi!
Ok then, it appears I was mistaken about the icons. Sorry...
So I relicensed again the Abstract Games under GPL 3 for the time being, and
removed the SameGame application which used BSD 3-Clause code from the Qt
examples. We also changed the X/O icons in TicTacToe which were from a Qt
examp
Hello!
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 11, 2020 12:19 AM, David Redondo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > As for the other two, we are not using the source code directly, however we
> > copied and were inspired by a lot of code from both sources,
>
> That's using the code.
Ok, I wont try to ar
As far as I know, it is fine to use GPL licensed icons in a non-GPL project
*provided* you don't change them, and you credit the original authors. Please
correct me if I'm wrong here. Added to that, we'll probably be moving to using
Breeze icons if the KDE switch proves successful.
As for the ot
Hi,
>As for the other two, we are *not* using the source code directly, however we
>copied and were inspired by a lot of code from both sources,
That's using the code.
Regards,
David
On Wednesday, 6 May 2020 08:36:28 BST David Redondo wrote:
> Hi,
> are you sure you can distribute your games under BSD? I see there is a file
>
> called CREDITS in the repo:
> >Credits for Abstract Games:
> >
> >- The source and icons used by tictactoe are from the Qt tic-tac-toe
> >example. - Th
Hi,
are you sure you can distribute your games under BSD? I see there is a file
called CREDITS in the repo:
>Credits for Abstract Games:
>
>- The source and icons used by tictactoe are from the Qt tic-tac-toe example.
>- The samegame is entirely from the Qt samegame example.
>- The icons used by
Sorry about that ;)
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 4, 2020 10:04 AM, The Abstract Developers
wrote:
> Yes, we definitely can re-license. We have been wanting for a long time to
> convert to the nonrestrictive 2-Clause BSD, which appears to be on their
> list. However, we
