Hi, are you sure you can distribute your games under BSD? I see there is a file called CREDITS in the repo:
>Credits for Abstract Games: > >- The source and icons used by tictactoe are from the Qt tic-tac-toe example. >- The samegame is entirely from the Qt samegame example. >- The icons used by these games come from the Papirus team. >- The icons used by bots are from from KDE killbots. >- The icons used by igo are from the KDE kigo. >- The chess engine came from the CPW chess engine. >- The icons for jetfighter and for frogger come from the Papirus team. - Qt examples are licensed under a BSD 3-Clause license [1] - Papirus is licensed as GPLv3 [2] - killbots and kigo are GPLv2 [3][4] - for cpw I can't find a license at all [5] [1] https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/examples-license.html [2] https://github.com/PapirusDevelopmentTeam/papirus-icon-theme/blob/master/ LICENSE [3] https://cgit.kde.org/killbots.git/tree/COPYING [4] https://cgit.kde.org/kigo.git/tree/COPYING [5] https://github.com/nescitus/cpw-engine Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2020, 00:27:34 CEST schrieb The Abstract Developers: > Sorry about that ;) > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Monday, May 4, 2020 10:04 AM, The Abstract Developers <abstractdeve...@protonmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, we definitely can re-license. We have been wanting for a long time to > > convert to the nonrestrictive 2-Clause BSD, which appears to be on their > > list. However, we would prefer not to use GPL. We can give you the > > reasons upon request. > > > > Thanks, > > The Abstract Developers
