https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422496
Laurent G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422496
Laurent G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405419
--- Comment #6 from Laurent G. ---
It used to be easy.
Don't know if my plugins to the Gimp still work.
Source code for the C plugin vanished from the net when gna.org disappeared,
years ago.
I looked at hte joined archive, the png for the dist
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405419
--- Comment #14 from Laurent G. ---
Good news, I found back my sources of the C plugin, dated from the 2008-06-08
...
Still have little time to check it is still functional.
Stay tuned, but patient.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405419
--- Comment #16 from Laurent G. ---
Created attachment 119165
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=119165&action=edit
Tajikistan districts map with borders 1 pixel thick
I changed the gray for some orange because my plugin does not trea
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405419
--- Comment #17 from Laurent G. ---
None of the txt file make sense to me.
Region information is repeated ad nauseum uselessly.
The closest to useful is the tajikistan.txt where we could get the district
names by removing text up to and including the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405419
--- Comment #18 from Laurent G. ---
In the png you sent, I notices 86 different colors. To which I added one for
the black borders.
But in the tajikistan, I can only find 67 lines.
Could you check where the mismatch lies ? Thanks in advance.
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405419
--- Comment #20 from Laurent G. ---
I updated http://lauranger.free.fr/kgeomapp/ for dead links.
One can found there links to the plugins sources, as well as some other maps.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397891
--- Comment #1 from Laurent G. ---
When, using the Gimp, I remove the alpha channel off your updated Norway png
file, I can see that previously gray zone that is tagged "Not Norway" exhibits
same color as Østfold.
That is consistent with t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397891
--- Comment #3 from Laurent G. ---
So I turned to ImageMagick identify.
We get
282: (219,185,228,255) #DBB9E4FF srgba(219,185,228,1)
241468: (220,220,220, 0) #DCDCDC00 srgba(220,220,220,0)
7353: (241, 14, 14,255) #F10E0EFF srgba
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355145
Laurent G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397891
--- Comment #7 from Laurent G. ---
Hum.
If we go your way, Karl, we have two choices :
1) Make transparency level mandatory in division colour specification in kgm.
And adapt checker accordingly. Not nice.
2) Cross-check colour from kgm with colour
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381078
--- Comment #1 from Laurent G. ---
I used such a much as below, to craft the Great Britain counties map,
http://lauranger.free.fr/kgeomapp/?divi=great-britain_counties&name=Great%20Britain%C2%A0(counties)
:
http://www.britain-visitor.com/britain-tr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352659
Laurent G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lauran...@free.fr
--- Comment #1 from Laurent G
14 matches
Mail list logo
