[kdeconnect] [Bug 382232] New: Auto-Pairing -kdeconnect ver 1.0.3-15.10

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382232 Bug ID: 382232 Summary: Auto-Pairing -kdeconnect ver 1.0.3-15.10 Product: kdeconnect Version: unspecified Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[plasmashell] [Bug 382297] New: Plasma crash on login immediately after showing desktop

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382297 Bug ID: 382297 Summary: Plasma crash on login immediately after showing desktop Product: plasmashell Version: 5.10.3 Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux

[kdeconnect] [Bug 382232] Auto-Pairing -kdeconnect ver 1.0.3-15.10

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382232 BingMyBong changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[kdeconnect] [Bug 382299] New: KDEconnect (1.0.3-16.1) Plasmoid to change state when paired

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382299 Bug ID: 382299 Summary: KDEconnect (1.0.3-16.1) Plasmoid to change state when paired Product: kdeconnect Version: unspecified Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux

[kdeconnect] [Bug 382299] KDEconnect (1.0.3-16.1) Plasmoid to change state when paired

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382299 --- Comment #2 from BingMyBong --- (In reply to Aleix Pol from comment #1) > At the moment, when it's paired it's marked as Active, otherwise inactive. > Meaning that if it's paired it will be shown by default otherwise hidden, if

[kmail2] [Bug 370183] New: Deleted folder reappears on next kmail2 session

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370183 Bug ID: 370183 Summary: Deleted folder reappears on next kmail2 session Product: kmail2 Version: unspecified Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[kmail2] [Bug 370183] Deleted folder reappears on next kmail2 session

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370183 --- Comment #1 from BingMyBong --- Version Information opensuse:tumbleweed:20161003 Qt: 5.7.0 KDE Frameworks: 5.26.0 KDE Plasma: 5.7.4 kwin5-5.7.4-1.3.x86_64 kmail5-16.08.1-1.2.x86_64 Kernel: 4.7.5-1-default -- You are receiving this mail because

[kmail2] [Bug 370184] New: Existing Filter search value field gets deleted when clicking on it

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370184 Bug ID: 370184 Summary: Existing Filter search value field gets deleted when clicking on it Product: kmail2 Version: unspecified Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux

[kmail2] [Bug 370184] Existing Filter search value field gets deleted when clicking on it

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370184 --- Comment #1 from BingMyBong --- Created attachment 101443 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101443&action=edit Shows area before any changes 1. Before any changes Display of 3 out of the 4 data entry areas are larger than the disp

[kmail2] [Bug 370184] Existing Filter search value field gets deleted when clicking on it

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370184 --- Comment #2 from BingMyBong --- Created attachment 101444 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101444&action=edit Data area display after clicking in box 2. Clicked on right hand side of data in 3rd box - data cleared -- You are re

[kmail2] [Bug 370184] Existing Filter search value field gets deleted when clicking on it

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370184 --- Comment #3 from BingMyBong --- Created attachment 101445 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101445&action=edit Display of data field to show data field diaplay area not large enough 3. Click on left hand side of data and move cu

[kmail2] [Bug 368445] kmail2 (v5.3.0) crashes : [warn] epoll_wait: Bad file descriptor

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368445 BingMyBong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bingmyb...@btinternet.com --- Comment #11 from

[kmail2] [Bug 369514] KMail crash on starting (nouveau-related)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369514 BingMyBong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bingmyb...@btinternet.com --- Comment #1 from

[kmail2] [Bug 369514] KMail crash on starting (nouveau-related)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369514 --- Comment #3 from BingMyBong --- (In reply to René Krell from comment #2) > (In reply to BingMyBong from comment #1) > > Maybe this should be logged against qtwebengine and nouveau as well > > Did report it to nouveau: https://bugs.

<    1   2   3