https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version Fixed In|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #31 from IWBR ---
I tried today's snapshot, and now it seems to work just fine. Digikam gives now
more priority to the "Original date and time" than the "Creation date and
time".
Thank you all!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #30 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
I will work while this week end to update all the bundles with current
git/master code.
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #29 from IWBR ---
Thank you very much! I'll try it as soon as the next digikam snapshot is
released.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #28 from Maik Qualmann ---
For the test I have removed from your image Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized.
Without the patch from comment 23, the date of 2018 will be recognized as the
creation date. With the patch recognizes the correct date of 2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #27 from IWBR ---
You are right. I think I might have added the digitized time at some point, in
order to find out what Date fields had priority. The tests I did previously do
not have the Digitized date field.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #26 from Maik Qualmann ---
This test image would have digiKam-0.5.9 correctly sorted with the date
2017-02-17, because Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized contains the same date. Look
in comment 20, Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized does not exist there
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #25 from IWBR ---
Created attachment 114944
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=114944&action=edit
IMG-20170217-WA0011.jpg
File used as an example that has been mentioned in the comments. There are two
dates in this image: 2017-02-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #24 from Maik Qualmann ---
The IMG-20170217-WA0011.jpg image to test would be good...
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #23 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit d69523ba54d640b9918c69853bea03b893e75874 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 13/09/2018 at 21:07.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
give DateTimeOriginal a higher priority
this fix does not break Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #22 from Maik Qualmann ---
Ok, we can give DateTimeOriginal a higher priority. Just take a look...
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #21 from IWBR ---
I also checked the official EXIF documentation at
https://www.exif.org/Exif2-2.PDF to see what is the "official" purpose of each
exif tag.
DateTime
The date and time of image creation. In this standard it is the date and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #20 from IWBR ---
I see. This is what exiv2 returns for the same picture (the second one).
user@Equip-3:~/Escriptori$ exiv2 -pa IMG-20170217-WA0011.jpg
Exif.Image.Software Ascii 7 Picasa
Exif.Image.DateTime
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #19 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
digiKam do not use exiftool, but Exiv2 shared library.
To compare properly, please use Exiv2 CLI tool, not Exiftool. This can give
some differences.
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #18 from IWBR ---
It's more complex than I though then.
In my particular case, I have a bunch of pictures sent via whatsapp that do not
have metadata in them, but their filename includes the date. Then I wrote a
script to enter EXIF date us
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Maik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #16 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
IWBR,
The rules to get date time-stamp from image to populate the database, can be
relevant of advanced metadata settings page from configuration dialog. Did you
take a look in this settings ?
Gilles Ca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #15 from IWBR ---
More tests:
The behavior is different in pictures without EXIF that had the date/time added
manually, than pictures taken from a digital camera that already have EXIF.
It seems that the date Digikam uses is variable. In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #14 from IWBR ---
I have made a few screenshots showing how the sort date is determined from the
metadata: https://imgur.com/a/Scn67Pb
In this example, the correct date should be 2017-02-17, but the date in "File
properties" shows 2018-09-0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
IWBR changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from IWBR ---
He
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Metadata|Metadata-Date
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #12 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
What's about this file using digiKam AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre release given at
this url :
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.2.0 |5.2.0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
Tomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomas.klou...@zoho.com
--- Comment #11 from Tomas ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Pomarede ---
hello
can't say at the moment, I'm still using kde4 / digikam 4 under mageia 5.
will give it a another look later when mageia 6 is released.
Nicolas
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching al
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338533
--- Comment #9 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
This file still valid using last digiKam 5.0.0 ?
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
26 matches
Mail list logo