https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498603
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498281
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hsan...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Michael
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498519
--- Comment #9 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #8)
> Hi Michael,
>
> I have several compile warnings here, unfortunately in German.
>
> In Datei, eingebunden von
> /home/maik/Devel/digikam/core
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498519
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498519
--- Comment #5 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #4)
> Hi Michael,
>
> Hmm, are you sure about qint64? I actually checked it before, both are
> actually int.
>
> Maik
One is an int, the other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498519
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #2)
> Pascal compiles with Qt5. I think qMax in the macros should be replaced with
> std:max for testing purposes.
>
> Maik
Hi Maik,
Good idea. I think the pr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498519
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #25 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #24)
> Hi Maik,
>
> Tom1 and Tom2 will have 2 fingerprints in the database if Tom1 != Tom2.
>
> Of course if Tom1 == Tom2, what's will be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #22 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to haselnuss87 from comment #21)
> Hello Mike, I am facing the same issue as René. First, SFace worked
> significantly better after training a few faces. The more faces I trained
> though,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498320
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498109
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.6.0
Latest Commit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #20 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #18)
> Hi Michael,
>
> I have generally set OpenCV-4.8.0 as the minimum version for digiKam. Or did
> you plan to do this individually for each model.
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #17 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #16)
> Perhaps asking to the OpenCV project forum is the simpler solution...
>
> https://forum.opencv.org/
>
> Gilles
We need a minimum of OpenCV 4.8
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #15 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #14)
> Did you recommend to increase the OpenCV minimal version to 4.10 as
> dependencies, to prevent this kind of dysfunction in the future?
>
> Gilles
I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #12)
> *** Bug 498104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Maik and Gilles,
I've confirmed this to be a bug in OpenCV v 4.6. I don't know in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #38 from Michael Miller ---
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UWhkx3GjoA
>
> After the images are found and added to the album there are a total of 10
> thumbnails.
>
> Accessing People > Michael, viewing the pre
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #10)
> Hi all,
>
> Look to the OpenCV change log :
>
> https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/OpenCV-Change-Logs
>
> Q to Michael : accordingly to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #5)
> A request has just arrived on the mailing list, which suggests that the
> OpenCV Debian packages are broken. I'll make a connection here.
>
> htt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #1 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to René Fritz from comment #0)
> I'm trying face recognition (again) with version 8.5.0. Summary: it doesn't
> work at all.
>
> For years I re-try the face recognition in digika
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497567
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459499
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #35 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #34)
> @Michael, When creating thumbnails in the face pipeline, we need to make
> sure that we already have the thumbnail in the Thumbnail DB before saving
> th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #33 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Michael Moore from comment #32)
> > [Mike] If you're willing to try very unstable code, grab the latest
> > AppImage and let's see if we can reproduce the issue. If we can,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #29 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Michael Moore from comment #28)
> > Can you provide the specs of your system? How fast is the CPU, what kind
> > of storage (local SSD, network share, etc...), and probably most
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497938
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #6)
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm not favorable to mix different programing language in digiKam. This will
> increase the entropy and make the maintenance a hel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #26 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Michael Moore from comment #25)
> Hi Gilles,
>
> For me the UI remains responsive. I can change away from the current People
> tab at any time without any lag.
>
> I'm no
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497938
--- Comment #5 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to chair-tweet-decal from comment #4)
> Indeed, the fact that it's Python might complicate things. It would likely
> be possible to export the model to ONNX, but that would require
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497938
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to chair-tweet-decal from comment #2)
> The CLIP model works locally, so there’s no need for an external system.
> CLIP is used in Stable Diffusion, so I assume its license would allow its
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #54 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to José Oliver-Didier from comment #53)
> I would like to add, I am quite impressed with the 8.5.0 face detection and
> recognition. Looking forward to 8.6!
Thank you, José. We are happy you li
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #52 from Michael Miller ---
> It is extremely good now. Thanks for the
Wunderbar! Danke, dass Sie mir das mitgeteilt haben.
There are significant improvements coming in 8.6.0, too. The pipelines have
been completely rewritten and are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #16 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to tab from comment #15)
> Created attachment 176819 [details]
> Result after new Training
Hi TAB,
Thanks for the screenshot. The face recognition engine accuracy isn't 100%,
and sometimes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497565
--- Comment #5 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to js333031 from comment #4)
> What version of OpenCV are you using? More recent versions of OpenVINO can
> use ONNX directly.
>
> I also think that OpenCV needs to be compiled with OpenVINO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497565
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to js333031 from comment #2)
> Thank you Mike. Please see
> https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/Intel-OpenVINO-backend#usage
>
> The link, if I understood correctly states that OpenVINO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497565
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497698
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to tab from comment #12)
> Yes, Mick, that's exactly what I'm looking for: "Rebuild all training data".
> I noticed thumbnails of "good" faces on the bottom right dur
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to tab from comment #10)
> Hi Mike,
> yes, I’m using YuNet and SFace in digiKam 8.5.0.
> I’ve also experimented with the two options under “Extras/Maintenance/Face
> Detection.”
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #9 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to tab from comment #8)
> Created attachment 176661 [details]
> Example after Face dedection.
>
> In this case I have 105 Confirmed Enteries.
> Dedection Face 1 is correct, 2,3,4 are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #4)
> I understand the bug report to mean that it is about the face detection
> itself, because too many objects are detected as faces that are not. So the
> user
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497264
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497264
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #3)
> This may be relevant:
>
> https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/appicon.html#setting-the-application-icon-on-macos
>
> Maik
Awesome. Thanks Maik. I'll c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497264
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497264
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434603
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444394
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Chris D from comment #12)
> I have been using 8.5 for a couplea weeks, and it is MUCH improved, so
> thanks to everyone for the hard work. Many more faces in my collection have
> been i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496380
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496131
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495985
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #3)
> (In reply to Michael Miller from comment #2)
> > Where does this exist in digiKam now? How did I miss it? I've been looking
> > for this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495985
--- Comment #2 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1)
> You want a statistics? A bar chart? Because such queries are already
> possible. I just checked, I only have 1239 images under 30mm focal length,
> so a wide
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495985
Bug ID: 495985
Summary: Feature idea: Image metadata analytics
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Other
Status: REP
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487004
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
Hi rogstr,
Thank you for the reply. It's great news you like the improvements we've made
in 8.5.0.
Keep the suggestions coming!
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425981
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #6)
> Why to close this one. Limiting the face recognition by tags already exists ?
I think this is another suggestion to improve recognition results by limiting
the l
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472416
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
Gilles, I think we can close this, unless we want to keep it as a suggestion
for when we rewrite the face pipeline.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487004
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to roqstr from comment #2)
> Re Point 2: That's not what I meant. I want to be able to apply the filter
> before running the face-recognition, not afterwards. So that the face
> sugges
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #49 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
Any feedback for us? How is it working? How can we improve?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
Thank you.
I'm going to keep this ticket open to remind me to look at NASNet when I start
updating the auto-tagging recognition models.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
--- Comment #23 from Michael Miller ---
Gilles,
I think we can close this.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #48 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
How is working for you now? Please let us know the results, and if you think
we can close this issue.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #47 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Jonathan from comment #45)
> So I installed the newest version from today, and cleared the training data.
> The recognition seems to be better. The false positives seemed to drop
> sign
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401458
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401458
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437896
--- Comment #8 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #7)
> Michael,
>
> I reopen 449310, as the topic sounds like different.
>
> Gilles
Yes, I agree. They are different suggestions.
Cheers,
Mike
--
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435146
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Gilles,
I think we can close this. The workflow now will clear a suggestion for a
face/image if it's not suggested in the most recent recognition run.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472416
--- Comment #2 from Michael Miller ---
I looked into this idea when implementing YuNet and SFace. There are 2
concerns with it. First, there is a significantly greater than 0 probability
that 2 faces found in the same image could be the same person
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437896
--- Comment #5 from Michael Miller ---
My testing shows this can probably be closed.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494284
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484743
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425981
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485029
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #44 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Jonathan from comment #43)
> I believe I have OpenCL but even though its on, it doesn't seem to help as
> just face detection alone took around 16 hours.
> I have a 7900xtx, and if it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #42 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #41)
> Look also this comment :
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495014#c3
>
> Typically, to be able to use opencl with opencv in digiKam, Mesa pa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #39 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Jonathan from comment #38)
> I only have a AMD CPU so CUDA is useless to me.
Hi Jonanathan,
That's ok. AMD can use OpenCL which will still allow for GPU offloading and
speedup. Follow the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #36 from Michael Miller ---
I'm using an M1 MacBook Pro, so we have that covered. Linux would be good,
especially if it has an NVidia CUDA capable GPU.
It's really whatever you want. The code is all the same for each platfor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #34 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
There is a bug in the code I just discovered. Face detection is ok. Face
recognition is not working right now. I'll let you know as soon as I fix the
bug.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #33 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to atoms from comment #32)
> That sounds really good. I have a huge collection, do you want me to help
> you test / build anything?
Hi Atoms,
Yes! Tuning the models isn't an exact scie
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #31 from Michael Miller ---
Also, to speed things up, try using "Extra Large" as the face size settings.
"Large" is good, too. "Large" will be the default starting tomorrow.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #30 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
Please download a new build. I made some updates to the models yesterday.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #28 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
Yes, many, many things have changed. First, we've introduced 2 new models in
8.5.0. YuNet is now the preferred face detection model. It is much faster
than YOLO and SSD. Second, we have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #26 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
When was the last time you downloaded digiKam? There was an issue in a build
from last week. The issue was even if you selected SFace in the settings, it
would still use OpenFace. Please download
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #24 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
Let's start from the beginning.
You should be using YuNet to find the faces, 65% accuracy, and medium or large
face size.
After the faces are found, you should be using SFace to recognize (
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469178
--- Comment #9 from Michael Miller ---
Hallo Andy,
Bitte!
Thank you for your patience, and my limited German. I'm happy this is working
for you now.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469178
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
Thanks Andy, we appreciate your help! It looks like we're moving in the right
direction.
Lowering the accuracy a little more should pick up most of the other faces. I
strongly recommend that you when dro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435367
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469178
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
Were you able to test the "Extra Small" faces option? Did it find all the
faces?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #18 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
First, please make sure you have the latest build from yesterday.
Try these settings:
Detection accuracy: 60%
Model: YuNet
Face Size: Large
Recognition Accuracy: 60%
Model: SFace
Uncheck Work on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #16 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
Can you please tell us what settings you’re using? Which face detection model,
detection accuracy %, face size setting, face recognition model, and face
recognition accuracy %?
Cheers,
Mike
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
--- Comment #22 from Michael Miller ---
I'm working on updating the defaults for the models. Hopefully I'll have
something in a few days. For now, try this:
Low false-positive rate, but will miss some faces and matches
YuNet: 60%
Large f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
--- Comment #20 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
For face recognition, set the accuracy to about 60%. You should get almost 0
false positives if the people you’ve tagged are all correct. I will be updating
the documentation soon.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
--- Comment #18 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
It looks like there is a new build of digiKam from today. It should have both
YuNet and SFace detection and recognition models enabled on Windows. Can you
give it a try, please?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
--- Comment #27 from Michael Miller ---
Gilles,
I shoot Sony (a7R III). Face regions are detected correctly in my RAW .ARW
files. I have verified over 300 files.
Igor, what model of Sony do you have?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444394
--- Comment #10 from Michael Miller ---
Yes, this is a known issue. The problem is digiKam doesn't save which
suggestion has been rejected as a match for a tagged face. It's something I'm
researching for the next rewrite of the Fac
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
--- Comment #17 from Michael Miller ---
I did a little research, and I was wrong. YuNet was added to OpenCV in v4.5.1,
and updated in 4.5.4. I'll update the checks tonight to check for a minimum
OpenCV version of 4.6 for YuNet. SFace is the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
--- Comment #15 from Michael Miller ---
Gilles,
Are we including OpenCV in the Windows package or requiring the end user to
install it? Is this why we had to put the OpenCV 4.10.0 check in?
Andy,
YuNet and SFace require OpenCV version 4.10.0 or
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|digikam-bugs-n
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
--- Comment #21 from Michael Miller ---
I shoot Sony (a7R III). The new facial detection and recognition AI models in
8.5.0 are working perfectly for me.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470018
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.5.0
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436544
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429230
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|digikam-bugs-n
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
