https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
--- Comment #16 from Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> --- (In reply to Braun.Lot from comment #15) > Hi Mike, > just checked and it is really good! Thank you. > > I am not sure about it, but it seems to me, that there are a few (just two > or three out of 100) images which give different results for tiff and jpg > format. > I will have a closer look at that, but the next point is much more important > for me: > > I would really appreciate it, if I could let it run over at least a hundred, > better a few thousand pictures. > Is that planned? > Marking all thumbnails in thumbnail view is possible, but does not give > correct results. > Should I file a new bug for that? > > Thank you very much > Lothar Hi lothar, > I am not sure about it, but it seems to me, that there are a few (just two > or three out of 100) images which give different results for tiff and jpg > format. That sounds about right for the accuracy of the AI model. Unfortunately no AI is going to be 100% perfect. > I would really appreciate it, if I could let it run over at least a hundred, > better a few thousand pictures. > Is that planned? Have you tried the Batch Queue Manager for processing a large number of files? Make sure you read the BQM documentation first. The default behavior is to create new copies of the modified image, and that may not be what you want. https://docs.digikam.org/en/batch_queue.html > Marking all thumbnails in thumbnail view is possible, but does not give > correct results. > Should I file a new bug for that? Yes, please. This will help us track the fix for multiple images selected in the thumbnail view. Thanks for helping us out! Cheers, Mike -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
