Peppe,Thanks for your detailed explanations about the 0.5 pixels shift. Hope I'll have time to tackle this next week,In the last distribution (rev.4882, downloadable from sourceforge), you will be able to test the raster polygonizer I added (named "Mike")Today, I tried to configure a brand new Ec
Hi Ede,Just noticed that the rev number of current V 2.0, based of the total number of commits, is much lower than the one from OpenJUMP 1 series.Probably because old svn commits have never been migrated to git.I don't think it is very important. Just wanted to know if you noticed it, and if you
On 16.05.2021 12:29, Michaud Michael wrote:
> I don't think it is very important. Just wanted to know if you noticed it,
> and if you choose to let it as is, or if it's just not possible to add an
> offset to the rev number so that v2 > v1.
indeed i did, but i actually don't care as it is merely
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump
Commit: 56457e89924b379aaa653e1da179daa19a4cd435
https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump/commit/56457e89924b379aaa653e1da179daa19a4cd435
Author: ed
Date: 2021-05-16 (Sun, 16 May 2021)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump
Commit: 6b36c664d8c71bf945ab5c1448e2eb7b7b6ae825
https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump/commit/6b36c664d8c71bf945ab5c1448e2eb7b7b6ae825
Author: ed
Date: 2021-05-16 (Sun, 16 May 2021)
Changed paths:
