Larry Becker wrote:
Hi,
> Guess we need to look at the Java change logs for 1.6.0_11. Is anyone using
> a 1.6 before _11 and after _07?
I'm using 1.6.0_10, and I'm unable to reproduce the problem. Smells like a Java
problem, either in versions up to _11 (where a bug got fixed) or beginning with
I can duplicate it with 1.6.0_10.
Looks like they've implemented a bug or changed something because of
JavaFX.
Malte
Larry Becker schrieb:
Guess we need to look at the Java change logs for 1.6.0_11. Is anyone
using a 1.6 before _11 and after _07?
Larry
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Ra
Malte Weller wrote:
Hi,
> I can duplicate it with 1.6.0_10.
> Looks like they've implemented a bug or changed something because of
> JavaFX.
What OS/Window manager are you using? I can't duplicate it with _10 on
Linux/IceWM.
Best regards, Andreas
--
l a t / l o n GmbH
Aennchenstrasse 19
I'm using Windows XP SP3.
Greetings from Hanover,
Malte
Andreas Schmitz schrieb:
Malte Weller wrote:
Hi,
I can duplicate it with 1.6.0_10.
Looks like they've implemented a bug or changed something because of
JavaFX.
What OS/Window manager are you using? I can't duplicate it with
-JRE 1.6.0_11
And two version of the softwrare
-OpenJUMP 1.2F (stable realize - zip version)
-openjump-core-1.2-20081218-bin (nigtly build)
Windows XP SP3
ADM Athlon(TM) XP 1800+
1.53 Mhz 469 Mb
The Test
OpenJUMP 1.2F (stable realize)
-JRE 1.5.0_12 OK
ot the
> constrained ones)
> - RIGHT click on map and get the menu
> - LEFT click on map, and there it is (the error)!
>
> I tried using
> -JRE 1.5.0_12
> -JRE 1.6.0_07
> -JRE 1.6.o_10
> -JRE 1.6.0_11
>
> And two version of the softwrare
> -OpenJUMP 1.2F (stable
> -JRE 1.6.0_07
>> -JRE 1.6.o_10
>> -JRE 1.6.0_11
>>
>> And two version of the softwrare
>> -OpenJUMP 1.2F (stable realize - zip version)
>> -openjump-core-1.2-20081218-bin (nigtly build)
>>
>> Windows XP SP3
>> ADM Athlon(TM) XP 1800+
>> 1
> >> constrained ones)
> >> - RIGHT click on map and get the menu
> >> - LEFT click on map, and there it is (the error)!
> >>
> >> I tried using
> >> -JRE 1.5.0_12
> >> -JRE 1.6.0_07
> >> -JRE 1.6.o_10
> >> -JRE 1.6.0_1
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Giuseppe Aruta
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I did some tests, following the information
> of Jukka
> > >>
> > >> -
6 10 and 11, although they seem to do no
> > real harm.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like there were a ton of changes in _10:
> > > > http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u10.html
> > > >
> > > > The only remaining issue I see is determining if
Aruta
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I did some tests, following the information of Jukka
>> >>
>> >> - select either draw polygon or draw linestring tool (basic, not the
>> >> co
> > bug
>>> > has been reported. I don't think we need a workaround, do we?
>>> >
>>> > Larry
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Giuseppe Aruta
>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>&g
sic, not the
>> constrained ones)
>> - RIGHT click on map and get the menu
>> - LEFT click on map, and there it is (the error)!
>>
>> I tried using
>> -JRE 1.5.0_12
>> -JRE 1.6.0_07
>> -JRE 1.6.o
> If the constrained tools extend the same MultiClickTool,
> then the same
> bug could appear.
I think Jukka wrote that they don't have this problem. I have to check his
message
Peppe
--
SF.Net email is Spons
Roger that.
If they don't have the same problem, then I wouldn't be against
removing them. This would make my fix unecessary. We should see what
Stefan thinks.
SS
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
>
>> If the constrained tools extend the same MultiClickTool,
>> then the sam
Hi,
Constrained versions are missing at least possibility to select features with
Ctrl-Left click, and the whole Right click menu. Right click menu has quite a
many tools. Have a look on those and think if they should be sacrified for
hiding this little bug. I would guess that adding right cl
only remaining issue I see is determining if this (Windows?) Java
>> > bug
>> > has been reported. I don't think we need a workaround, do we?
>> >
>> > Larry
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Giuseppe Aruta
>> >
Good feedback Jukka. Paolo has suggested another fix to the existing
"non-constrained" tools that might work.
Whodda thunk such a little bug would merit such an extensive discussion. :]
SS
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Constrained versions are missing at least
> Whodda thunk such a little bug would merit such an
> extensive discussion. :]
>
> SS
Happy "IndexOutOfBoundsExceptions" 2009_1.6.0_11!!
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas,
Hi Jukka,
I didn't realize these extra shortcut on originale draw tools
BTW I discover an extra useful tool. Try this
1) select draw polygon (tool on toolboxor draw line)
2) start to draw the polygon
3) hold Ctrl
4) while holding ctrl change the tool on the toolbox, eg. selecting or move tool
by
_10:
>> > http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u10.html
>> >
>> > The only remaining issue I see is determining if this (Windows?) Java
>> > bug
>> > has been reported. I don't think we need a workaround, do we?
>> >
>> > Larry
Hi,
Amazing. You can even stop drawing a line, select point tool, insert couple of
points and continue the line that was on hold. Larry, have you been aware of
that existing possibility while thinking about the custom drawing tools?
-Jukka-
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Giuseppe
Paolo wrote: "I didn't tested it very extensively, but it seems to
give no problem.
It's just a matter of trying it for a while and see what happens."
OK. That's good. Did we commit this to the core then?
SS
--
SF.Net em
No, Peppe has discovered an unknown (to me) feature of quasimode tools.
They are designed to be interruptible, but I was unaware that you could
switch tools using the control key. It makes sense though.
It makes custom drawing tools even more useful. I haven't accomplished any
more on them yet.
Cool find Peppe. Should we put something about this on the Wiki? Or
even better...make a little tutorial video. :]
SS
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Larry Becker wrote:
> No, Peppe has discovered an unknown (to me) feature of quasimode tools.
> They are designed to be interruptible, but I was
For the aspiring programmers among us:
I wrote a short blog post about what I learned from my experiences
developing the Super Select Tool plug-in for OpenJUMP, which is now
quite a mess. You might find it interesting if you are just starting
to tinker with Java and OJ.
http://openjump.blogspot.c
I'd like to try out my refactoring of the core in a more incremental
way. (See the latest post on http://openjump.blogspot.com/ for more
details.) I believe the easiest way to do this would be with a branch
of the SVN. I don't want to make changes to our trunk, but if I use a
copy of the trunk on m
sure...
but I have no clue either if you can approach what you want by that.
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> I'd like to try out my refactoring of the core in a more incremental
> way. (See the latest post on http://openjump.blogspot.com/ for more
> details.) I believe the easiest way to do t
28 matches
Mail list logo
