Re: [JPP-Devel] More than one user on a single OpenJUMP installation?

2007-11-02 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Thanks Uwe. I'm going to proceed with my "current user" functionality. This will be included in a class that extends the JUMP AbstractPlugIn class, so the functionality will be available to other plug-in developers if they so choose. I'll be trying to modify the Super Select tool so that the confi

Re: [JPP-Devel] Subversion Time-Lapse View

2007-11-02 Thread Eric Lemesre
I would try it this week. Eric 2007/10/31, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > because it is easier to use for non GUI-experts? > > just a thought, and noted here: > > http://buoy.sourceforge.net/AboutBuoy.html > > otherwise, why should michael have used it. > but if somebody is able to rem

Re: [JPP-Devel] Subversion Time-Lapse View

2007-11-02 Thread Paul Austin
Eric, Please try using regular Swing, I'd like to remove Buoy from Open JUMP as I see no real advantage over the functionality offered by swing. Sure it maybe slightly easier for developers who aren't used to swing. But it's just another API that people will have to learn. Paul Eric Lemesre

Re: [JPP-Devel] More than one user on a single OpenJUMP installation?

2007-11-02 Thread Paul Austin
Hi Landon, I don't think you need to subclass the Abstract plugin in to do this. Looking at the problem there are a couple of things to think about. I'm going to use the concept of a workspace (think eclipse) for each of a user's different configurations of JUMP 1. There will need to be so

Re: [JPP-Devel] UI and buoy (reminder)

2007-11-02 Thread Michaƫl Michaud
Hi, As I am the one who used buoy in a plugin (simple query, which has been introduced in the core distribution at some point), I'll give again my feeling : Buoy is a great UI toolkit. I'm not an expert who will assure it is better than all other ones, but as far as I can remember, it offers a

Re: [JPP-Devel] More than one user on a single OpenJUMP installation?

2007-11-02 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Paul, You are probably correct in stating that an extension of the AbstractPlugIn class may not be the most elegant solution for supporting user-specific behavior in OpenJUMP. Perhaps I can explain a little of the "bigger picture" that I am trying to accomplish. This may help you understand why I

Re: [JPP-Devel] UI and buoy (reminder)

2007-11-02 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I think we could benefit from removing the details of this discussion and dealing with a more abstract case. The real question seems to be centered on the inclusion of third party libraries required to run a plug-in. I think a simple solution, already pointed out to me by Paul, is this: Plug-In d

[JPP-Devel] [Off-Topic: Java Programming] Design By Contract

2007-11-02 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Does anyone have experience with design-by-contract programming in Java? It seems like most of the dbc frameworks I have looked at for Java either use Javadoc comments or some type of preproccessor to implement dbc programming. It seems like you could do the same basic thing with regular Java code

[JPP-Devel] Wizard bug solved? - SF Bug [ 1819138 ]

2007-11-02 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei Paul, is this bug solved? http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1819138&group_id=118054&atid=679906 stefan - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find pro