Larry,
I've done work related to launchers and classpaths before so I should be
able to adapt it to work with multiple jar files
Paul
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version
Paul,
As it currently stands, the SkyJUMP launcher assumes that the
startup jar has all of the classpath stuff defined in the Manifest.
This is what SkyJUMP does, but to date this technique has not worked
on OJ. I'm not sure what the problem is. It may have something to do
with having two mai
SS,
I'm going to do this in stages.
1. Create the new module
2. Change and test the new binary
3. Cleanup the core module, moving some launcher files around a bit.
Will need something like the scripts directory to put the compiled
versions in so that the nightly build doesn't have to build the
Paul wrote: "When I think modules I think top level directories in the
SVN with their
own trunk, tags and branches.
So we would have
/openjump-launcher
/trunk
/tags
/branches
This module would contain any source code for building binary launchers
and installers. I changed my mind from w
SS,
When I think modules I think top level directories in the SVN with their
own trunk, tags and branches.
So we would have
/openjump-launcher
/trunk
/tags
/branches
This module would contain any source code for building binary launchers
and installers. I changed my mind from win3
Larry's idea for a launcher based on Eclipse sounds interesting, but
might we contact the JSmooth folks to see of there is already support
for a flexible class path that we are missing, or, to see if there are
plans to add it?
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 7/11/07, Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Paul,
I don't have a problem with adding a module to the SVN for Microsoft
Windows specific items either.
Would we make a subdiredtory of /trunk/installer or /trunk/scripts for
this purpose?
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 7/4/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > What I'm propo
>
> What I'm proposing is that we start to modularize the Open JUMP SVN and
> put all the windows specific application in it's own module.
no problem with that
if you want to start.. then go ahead
(unfortunately i did not had yet one look on the svn)
stefan
>
> Paul
>
> Stefan Steiniger wr
Hi Stefan,
There were two things in the email, first was creating a launcher that
allows OpenJUMP to behave as a normal windows application. For this it
would be nice to adapt the work done by the SkyJUMP team.
The other is the installer, which as you mention we already have.
What I'm propos
mhm.. i am bit confuses
first we were talking about a launch tool and now about an installer?
@Paul.. Steve has long time ago setup an installer for windows for OJ
version 1.0.1. This stuff is still on the cvs. as far as i remember it
is the nullsoft installer.
stefan
Larry Becker schrieb:
>
Hi Paul,
Assuming everyone agrees, of course, that would be great! The
Eclipse launcher that it is based on is written in cross platform C
(mostly) with the necessarily platform dependent stuff isolated into
specific directories.
Supporting drag and drop is simply a matter of processing comm
Hi Larry,
As you've obviously tried various different launchers and come up with
one that works with the JUMP platform, any chance that we could back
port this work into open jump? What else is required to support drag and
drop into the JUMP platform. Also I'm presuming your launcher allows yo
Hi,
I've used Jsmooth a few years ago and I found it smart (especially
simple to use), but if launch4J is more flexible, maybe a good idea to
use it instead.
Michaël
Larry Becker a écrit :
>I've tried launch4j and it worked OK. For SkyJUMP I ultimately
>decided to build a custom launcher usi
I've tried launch4j and it worked OK. For SkyJUMP I ultimately
decided to build a custom launcher using the eclipse launcher for
additional flexibility. That was the only way I could get
double-click and drag and drop file functionality to work.
Larry
On 7/3/07, Paul Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stefan,
Have a look under installer directory in SVN, I'm not sure who put it there.
Paul
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
i don't have problems with launch4j
although i did miss who uses jsmooth? (maybe because i have been not
following the list in the last 2 weeks)
stefan
Paul Austin wrote:
i don't have problems with launch4j
although i did miss who uses jsmooth? (maybe because i have been not
following the list in the last 2 weeks)
stefan
Paul Austin wrote:
> I've been looking at the existing windows launcher using JSmooth and
> see one problem with it. With JSmooth you have to
16 matches
Mail list logo
