Paul wrote: "When I think modules I think top level directories in the SVN with their own trunk, tags and branches.
So we would have /openjump-launcher /trunk /tags /branches This module would contain any source code for building binary launchers and installers. I changed my mind from win32 specific as we may want win64, macosx, linux etc launchers and installers in the future." This makes good sense. Go for it. (Does this eliminate the need for the /trunk/scripts directory? We want to keep things as clean as possible.) Paul wrote: "On the issue of JSmooth v.s. launch4j v.s. eclipse base launcher I personally think I'd like to take Larry's code and make changes to brand it as OpenJump as he's done a lot of work to make things work smoothly. When I tried JSmooth it didn't create a valid exe." O.K. I know Larry does great work, I just worry about getting something that is too complex, even if it is fancy. :] I'll trust your judgement on this one. The Sunburned Surveyor On 7/11/07, Paul Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SS, > > When I think modules I think top level directories in the SVN with their > own trunk, tags and branches. > > So we would have > > /openjump-launcher > /trunk > /tags > /branches > > This module would contain any source code for building binary launchers > and installers. I changed my mind from win32 specific as we may want > win64, macosx, linux etc launchers and installers in the future. > > You would then compile this module to create the actual executables. > > We could also add a copy of the generated binary into the core module > when we generate it for the releases. > > By having separate modules they can have their own life cycle that is > independent from the core module. > > On the issue of JSmooth v.s. launch4j v.s. eclipse base launcher I > personally think I'd like to take Larry's code and make changes to brand > it as OpenJump as he's done a lot of work to make things work smoothly. > When I tried JSmooth it didn't create a valid exe. > > Paul > > Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > > Paul, > > > > I don't have a problem with adding a module to the SVN for Microsoft > > Windows specific items either. > > > > Would we make a subdiredtory of /trunk/installer or /trunk/scripts for > > this purpose? > > > > The Sunburned Surveyor > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
