Hello,
Tuesday, the 12th is a busy day for me. I'm free from 17:30. Hope is not
too late for Stefan's train.
Cheers,
Ugo
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> we don't know yet when we will discuss the things,
> But it wont be during the workshop time (starts 9 a.m. CEST = Central
> European Summer Time,
we don't know yet when we will discuss the things,
But it wont be during the workshop time (starts 9 a.m. CEST = Central
European Summer Time, 12th Sept. )
please have a look on the conference website for the conf-schedule:
http://www.foss4g2006.org/
i said that i will come on tuesday - so i gue
Sounds good Ugo.
Can someone let me know the date of the conference you mentioned, and
what time I might be able to patch into a conference call. (I'll need
the time zone as well.)
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 8/26/06, Ugo Taddei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> >
> >>
> >>I was wondering what yo
Hi,
>
>>
>>I was wondering what you thought about preparing another stable
>>release of OpenJUMP in the next couple of moths. I will have some time
>>off of work in December.
>>
>>
>>
> jep .. i guess this year should be a further one..
> it depends on
> - my time and on
> - how stable it is... (c
Sounds like a plan Stefan.
In the meantime I'll be working on this memory fix.
SS
On 8/25/06, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >I was wondering what you thought about preparing another stable
> >release of OpenJUMP in the next couple of moths. I will have some time
> >off of
>
>I was wondering what you thought about preparing another stable
>release of OpenJUMP in the next couple of moths. I will have some time
>off of work in December.
>
>
>
jep .. i guess this year should be a further one..
it depends on
- my time and on
- how stable it is... (currently there is
Stefan,
You have indeed been the OpenJUMP project for the past few months, and
for that I am grateful, as I know others are.
I was just curious about your purposes for OpenJUMP, since most
developers seem to be involved with it as part of another project.
I'm glad I'm not the only freelancer. :]
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
>Sounds good Stefan. I'll just leave the CVS alone for the time being. :]
>
>Are you working on OpenJUMP as part of the SIGLE project? Or as part
>of something else?
>
>
lets say this way: Currently I AM THE OpenJUMP PROJECT *g* :o)
.. at least the one contributing to
No problem Ugo.
If I end up tweaking the source code for OpenJUMP I may set up a SVN
at the SurveyOS Project.
I'll give you guys some time to get used to the idea of SVN. :]
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 8/25/06, Ugo Taddei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while I'm not against svn, I lack t
Hello,
while I'm not against svn, I lack time to move. I also find svn is not
yet quite established (oh, please don't flame me ;-)
I'd support svn at a later time, but not quite now.
Cheers,
Ugo
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> as far as i know i am the only one who is comitting frequently..
> Ugo d
Sounds good Stefan. I'll just leave the CVS alone for the time being. :]
Are you working on OpenJUMP as part of the SIGLE project? Or as part
of something else?
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 8/24/06, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as far as i know i am the only one who is comitting fr
as far as i know i am the only one who is comitting frequently..
Ugo does also if he has some time
BUT .. there should be a couple of people using the anonymous
read-access provided by sourceforge (e.g. the people reporting errors)
Since CVS is a bit more distributed than SVN, for instance eclips
Stefan,
Fair enough! I don't want to pee in anybody's bowl of Cheerios! :]
I'm not really sure how many developers are actively contributing to
the OpenJUMP CVS. If the traffic is low, I thought that it would be a
doog time to make the switch.
If you are currently using the CVS extensively and d
>
>I think I will place the current OpenJUMP code in the SVN Repository
>at the SurveyOS Project. That way I don't derail the developers using
>the JPP CVS, but I can see how OpenJUMP code works in Subversion.
>
>
>
thats ok.. maybe i will see some things which are better done with svn
but don'
Thank you for your comments Steve. Your input is always appreciated.
You have an excellent idea about placing plug-in code into the CVS. I
will give that some more serious thought.
I think there are some advantages to Subversion. Its main appeal to me
is the ease with which the directory structur
15 matches
Mail list logo
