Hi All -
#osgeolive team here! -- one big decision this year is Java version
.. Is version 8 sufficient?
thank you and best regards from Berkeley, Calif. --Brian M
Hamlin / MAPLABS / OSGeoLive PSC
On 5/20/22 3:09 AM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
Mike,
i didn't see a time table
hey Brian,
OJ2 is still java8+ compatible and we are currently not planning to raise the
java level runtime requirement. we are also not aware of any compatibility
issues with more recent java versions although we only test sporadically.
so, yeah, java8 should work fine :) ..thanks ede
On 20.
Mike,
i didn't see a time table for OsgeoLive so far, so i guess it's still some
month until. so take your time, i will post if i got more definitive news. if
they got alpha builds i will prepare whatever is latest and test that then.
sunny regards ..ede
On 20.05.2022 09:18, Michaud Michael w
Ede,OpenJUMP 2.0 is quite stable now.However, I would be pleased to include some recent fixes in a bug fix release.I can also include Peppe improvements.I will not try to merge heatmap branch which could introduce regression, but I'd like to backport at least fixes.If we fix a release date, I can
Hi Peppe,I can port your changes to 2.0 if you want,Also, I have started a branch including big changes on raster symbology (branch = heatmapstyle).My original goal was to add a raster style for some kinds of multiband rasters, but from one thing to the next I made more import changes.- make Rast
hey Peppe,
looks like those changes are not in *osgeo* OJ 1.16 as well, so no stopper for
OJ2 as such.
surely they should be ported to OJ2 in the future, maybe start an issue on
github, just to make sure? ..ede
On 19.05.2022 10:08, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
Hi Ede,
There are still some enhancem
Hi Ede,
There are still some enhancement/bugs that I did on OpenJUMP 1.16 in
december:
https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/HEAD/tree/core/trunk/ChangeLog
In detail, points 6677 and 6678 are the bugs
Thank you
Peppe
Il giorno lun 16 mag 2022 alle ore 18:43 ha scritto:
> hey All,
>
> are we
