Hi All -
#osgeolive team here! -- one big decision this year is Java version
.. Is version 8 sufficient?
thank you and best regards from Berkeley, Calif. --Brian M
Hamlin / MAPLABS / OSGeoLive PSC
On 5/20/22 3:09 AM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
Mike,
i didn't see a time table for OsgeoLive so far, so i guess it's still
some month until. so take your time, i will post if i got more
definitive news. if they got alpha builds i will prepare whatever is
latest and test that then.
sunny regards ..ede
On 20.05.2022 09:18, Michaud Michael wrote:
Ede,
OpenJUMP 2.0 is quite stable now.
However, I would be pleased to include some recent fixes in a bug fix
release.
I can also include Peppe improvements.
I will not try to merge heatmap branch which could introduce
regression, but I'd like to backport at least fixes.
If we fix a release date, I can organize myself and see what I can
include and what I must postpone.
Michaël
envoyé : 16 mai 2022 à 18:43
de : edgar.sol...@web.de
à : OpenJump develop and use <jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
objet : [JPP-Devel] OSGeoLive and OJ2
hey All,
are we satisfied with revamped OJ 2.0 stability and should include
it in the upcoming OSGeoLive release? Or do we need to do a quick
maintenance release beforehand?
Or should we stick with previous stable OJ 1.16 for the time being?
.. sunny regards, ede
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
