Ready for 1.9
Il 31/Dic/2015 16:55, "Michaël Michaud" ha
scritto:
> Hi ede,
>
> I have nothing to add before 1.9 release. Just want to use it a bit in
> my working environment next week.
> If you wait one week from now on, as proposed, I think it is OK.
>
> Michaël
>
> Le 31/12/2015 16:58, edgar.
Hi ede,
I have nothing to add before 1.9 release. Just want to use it a bit in
my working environment next week.
If you wait one week from now on, as proposed, I think it is OK.
Michaël
Le 31/12/2015 16:58, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
> hey All,
>
> after including Alberto's FeatureInfoTool W
just in case, please make sure you take thel atest from the svn trunk if
possible.
..ede
On 31.12.2015 17:08, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> sounds good.
>
> Am 31.12.15 um 12:58 schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de:
>> hey All,
>>
>> after including Alberto's FeatureInfoTool WMS addition, are there any othe
sounds good.
Am 31.12.15 um 12:58 schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de:
> hey All,
>
> after including Alberto's FeatureInfoTool WMS addition, are there any other
> open cunstruction sites? let's say i will wait a week from now on and release
> 1.9.0 . if still something is amiss i can simply come up wit
hey All,
after including Alberto's FeatureInfoTool WMS addition, are there any other
open cunstruction sites? let's say i will wait a week from now on and release
1.9.0 . if still something is amiss i can simply come up with a 1.9.1 quickly.
Stefan: what was that about translation agn? can you
Ede,
I retrieved the feature info url from the WMSService of each WMS layer,
added to that url the needed parameters (BBox...), and sent the request
over to server.
Alberto
On 23 December 2015 at 15:03, wrote:
> Alberto,
>
> simply commit your changes. Jukka can then easily test the snapshot.
Alberto,
simply commit your changes. Jukka can then easily test the snapshot.
i am reasonably sure that the WMS Connection caches the auth info, didn't you
reuse the existing infrastructure?
..ede
On 23.12.2015 14:21, Alberto De Luca wrote:
> Jukka,
>
> I don't have access to a server reques
Jukka,
I don't have access to a server requesting authentication, so I can't test
that feature. And, to be honest, I don't believe it's working at the moment!
How would you like to procede? Shall I commit the changes so far so you can
test and fix the issue yourself? Or do you want me to pass you
Hi,
Once you are ready I can test with our server how GetFeatureInfo works through
https and basic authentication.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Alberto De Luca wrote:
Edgar,
I know this might be annoying, but I got today a request for adding to the
FeatureInfoTool the capability to display the results f
no problemo. thats why i ask early ;)).. just holler when your done.. ede
On 22.12.2015 18:47, Alberto De Luca wrote:
> Edgar,
>
> I know this might be annoying, but I got today a request for adding to the
> FeatureInfoTool the capability to display the results from querying WMS
> layers. I've al
Great thanks, I'll let you know asap!
Alberto
On 22 December 2015 at 19:05, wrote:
> no problemo. thats why i ask early ;)).. just holler when your done.. ede
>
> On 22.12.2015 18:47, Alberto De Luca wrote:
> > Edgar,
> >
> > I know this might be annoying, but I got today a request for adding t
Edgar,
I know this might be annoying, but I got today a request for adding to the
FeatureInfoTool the capability to display the results from querying WMS
layers. I've already implemented it (very basic: a fourth panel in the
FeatureInfoTool, showing the server response as plain text), but I'd need
hey All,
i am getting warmer to put together OJ 1.9 . has anybody any objections? what
is the status in your fields of interest?
..ede
--
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jum
whhooo.. I see I really need to start with a blog on my experiences.
Already some friends of me have been requesting such. :)
I guess I will be proud to be one in the huge family of Canadian OS-GIS
people.
thanx all for whishes. (btw. I will take the plane on 5th of February...)
stefan
Martin
How cold is it in Calgary? It's so cold that the features are frozen.
Ha, ha. ha...
Good luck in Canada, Stefan, and welcome to the New World.
best regards,
Larry
On Jan 18, 2008 3:28 PM, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whhooo.. I see I really need to start with a blog on my expe
My two favorite Canadian words:
Eh
About (Pronounced "a boat")
SS
On Jan 18, 2008 12:15 PM, Martin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not as cold as Edmonton... as I'm sure Stefan will quickly learn to
> point out to anyone who asks.
>
> (Calgary and Edmonton have a long-standing rivalry over w
Not as cold as Edmonton... as I'm sure Stefan will quickly learn to
point out to anyone who asks.
(Calgary and Edmonton have a long-standing rivalry over which is
"better". Edmonton sees Calgary as brash and cultureless, while Calgary
sees Edmonton as stodgy and cold. Meanwhile, BC'ers like
Stefan,
I used to live a couple hours south of Calgary on the US side of the
border. I've been to Calgary and it is a cold place. I hope your move
is successful.
This makes you another Canadian JUMP user. :]
Landon
On Jan 18, 2008 5:16 AM, Giuseppe Aruta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
Hi Stefan,
I would add to your list solving OJ memory problems
when a view is exported to High resolution image.
Larry thought to solve this proble on next printing
code. So let's take time that OJ needs
Good luck for your journey.
Peppe
--- Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)
> -Alkuperäinen viesti-
> Lähettäjä: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Puolesta Stefan Steiniger
> Lähetetty: 18. tammikuuta 2008 13:27
> Vastaanottaja: List for discussion of JPP development and use.
> Aihe:
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
Hi,
> no feature freeze yet...
> Since I want to add also some tools for before doing the next release
> (Polygon Cut and Attribute Classification)
>
> As I am currently quite busy with preparing my move to Calgary, there
> will probably no release in January (can't est
Hei Andreas,
no feature freeze yet...
Since I want to add also some tools for before doing the next release
(Polygon Cut and Attribute Classification)
As I am currently quite busy with preparing my move to Calgary, there
will probably no release in January (can't estimate for February too).
ch
Hi,
I wanted to ask about the release status. Are we in a feature freeze? I'm asking
because I'll probably be able to work on some new features (for example a
limited SLD import) soon. If we're in a feature freeze, I'd vote for creating a
branch that's frozen so I can work on the new features in t
23 matches
Mail list logo
