On 16.05.2021 12:29, Michaud Michael wrote:
> I don't think it is very important. Just wanted to know if you noticed it,
> and if you choose to let it as is, or if it's just not possible to add an
> offset to the rev number so that v2 > v1.
indeed i did, but i actually don't care as it is merely
Hi Ede,Just noticed that the rev number of current V 2.0, based of the total number of commits, is much lower than the one from OpenJUMP 1 series.Probably because old svn commits have never been migrated to git.I don't think it is very important. Just wanted to know if you noticed it, and if you
