Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-18 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Yep.. because we have people like Larry, Paul, Michael and Geoff that seem to take care fulltime around Jumps :) thank you guys.. and i hope some one pays it back, not only with words stefan Martin Davis schrieb: > Great work! > > What I like about this list is that you can throw out an idea a

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I'd like to use Layerable, since that will give us more flexibity down the road. SS On 9/13/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yep! > > i agree, and this reminds me on having the same for features that show > the most prominent "what i want to know about" .. ie. number of > vertice

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Stefan Steiniger
I actually would prefer to have switched icon in the layer menu (maybe for both editing and selecting). Because i am not sure that people recognize the change. but the image use can be defered to a later version > Is there currently a Snappable setting on layers in OJ? Or is this > still just

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Martin Davis
Great work! What I like about this list is that you can throw out an idea and like magic it gets implemented 20 minutes later. 8^) But seriously... it's very inspiring interacting with a bunch of clever people all focussed on making JUMP work better. I checked with the uDig guys... DnD is ge

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Larry Becker
I guess if I got used to decoding those tiny symbols on the icons in Eclipse, I can do it in JUMP too. :-} Yea, we already enhanced the layer tooltips to show the full source path, so adding the essential data on as additional lines should be doable too. I added mouse wheel zooming to the PanToo

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Martin Davis
Good idea. So italics would mean NOT Selectable, right? I think Stefan's right - ultimately an icon change would be good too (or maybe a second icon showing the states). But the font change is good and quick to do now. Hey, I just thought of something which might be handy. In Swing Tooltips

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Stefan Steiniger
mhm.. usecase: if you have activated a drawing tool (such as polygon drawing) then you can not select at the same time, right? .. so from this point of few, not selectable can/should imply not snappable, because slectable layers are still be snappable. so it could be named a double funtion selec

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Larry Becker
How about Italicizing the layer name? This is consistent with bold meaning Editable. Larry On 9/17/07, Martin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is the right way to go IMO, Larry/all. We added the Selectable > option while building the Image framework, to avoid having image > bounding boxe

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Martin Davis
This is the right way to go IMO, Larry/all. We added the Selectable option while building the Image framework, to avoid having image bounding boxes selected all the time. But we never pushed this out to be visible to the user. Time to do it, I guess! Have you thought about how to make this v

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Martin Davis
Larry Becker wrote: > I just created a SelectablePlugIn by copying EditablePlugIn and making > a few trivial changes. It seems to work like a charm! > > Now, do we need Snappable, (Sp?) or should not Selectable imply not > Snappable? It doesn't currently. > I can definitely see situations w

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Larry Becker
I just created a SelectablePlugIn by copying EditablePlugIn and making a few trivial changes. It seems to work like a charm! Now, do we need Snappable, (Sp?) or should not Selectable imply not Snappable? It doesn't currently. Larry On 9/17/07, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Stef

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-17 Thread Larry Becker
Hi Stefan, I just looked at the code and it appears we already have a selectable property in Layer. However, the setSelectable() method is currently only called from ImageFeatureCreator. The isSelectable() method is called in AbstractSelection, so it appears that all we need to do to add a me

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-13 Thread Stefan Steiniger
yep! i agree, and this reminds me on having the same for features that show the most prominent "what i want to know about" .. ie. number of vertices, geom-type, inner rings, perimeter, area, centroid coords,.. furthermore there was the idea to give layers 4 states: - editable (selectable, snapp

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-12 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi Larry, Excellent plugin ! Michaël Larry Becker a écrit : >A new feature was added last night which adds a menu item "Layer >Properties" to the Layer Name right click menu. This feature will >display layer information and statistics such as name, number of >features, number of points, numbe

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-12 Thread Martin Davis
Great idea, Larry! Maybe this could even display the *actual* class of the FeatureCollection and Features which form the layer? Or is that too developer-oriented for our tender users? Larry Becker wrote: > A new feature was added last night which adds a menu item "Layer > Properties" to the L

Re: [JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-11 Thread Paul Austin
Hi Larry, Sounds great, this is something that could fit into my dockable windows stuff nicely. Which I'll be releasing a preview release of very shortly. Paul Larry Becker wrote: > A new feature was added last night which adds a menu item "Layer > Properties" to the Layer Name right click menu

[JPP-Devel] Layer Properties

2007-09-11 Thread Larry Becker
A new feature was added last night which adds a menu item "Layer Properties" to the Layer Name right click menu. This feature will display layer information and statistics such as name, number of features, number of points, number of attributes, geometry type, DataSource class, and source path.