I actually would prefer to have switched icon in the layer menu (maybe 
for both editing and selecting). Because i am not sure that people 
recognize the change. but the image use can be defered to a later version

 > Is there currently a Snappable setting on layers in OJ?  Or is this
 > still just an app-wide editing setting?

i think the setting for snapping on/off was application wide. But i 
don't know how the selection and snapping mechansims are implemented.

stefan

Larry Becker schrieb:
> How about Italicizing the layer name?  This is consistent with bold
> meaning Editable.
> 
> Larry
> 
> On 9/17/07, Martin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is the right way to go IMO, Larry/all.  We added the Selectable
>> option while building the Image framework, to avoid having image
>> bounding boxes selected all the time.  But we never pushed this out to
>> be visible to the user.  Time to do it, I guess!
>>
>> Have you thought about how to make this visible on the UI?  Maybe by
>> changing the layer icon somehow? It's always nice to have state visible
>> to the user, so that he doesn't get confused about why things don't
>> appear to be working like normal.
>>
>> Larry Becker wrote:
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>>    I just looked at the code and it appears we already have a
>>> selectable property in Layer.  However, the setSelectable() method is
>>> currently only called from ImageFeatureCreator.  The isSelectable()
>>> method is called in AbstractSelection, so it appears that all we need
>>> to do to add a menu item "Selectable" right below "Editable".
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Larry
>>>
>>> On 9/17/07, Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to use Layerable, since that will give us more flexibity down the 
>>>> road.
>>>>
>>>> SS
>>>>
>>>> On 9/13/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yep!
>>>>>
>>>>> i agree, and this reminds me on having the same for features that show
>>>>> the most prominent "what i want to know about" .. ie. number of
>>>>> vertices, geom-type, inner rings, perimeter, area, centroid coords,..
>>>>>
>>>>> furthermore there was the idea to give layers 4 states:
>>>>> - editable (selectable, snapping on)
>>>>> - hitable (selectable, snapping on)
>>>>> - visible (not selectable, snapping on)
>>>>> - invisible
>>>>> or something like that. This is beneficial if one digitizes.
>>>>>
>>>>> where would be the best position to add such a layer attribute.
>>>>> Layerable? or Layer?
>>>>>
>>>>> stefan
>>>>>
>>>>> Michaël Michaud schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Larry,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Excellent plugin !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michaël
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Larry Becker a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A new feature was added last night which adds a menu item  "Layer
>>>>>>> Properties" to the Layer Name right click menu.  This feature will
>>>>>>> display layer information and statistics such as name, number of
>>>>>>> features, number of points, number of attributes, geometry type,
>>>>>>> DataSource class, and source path.  It works on single or multiple
>>>>>>> layer selections.  It also includes a transparency adjustment slider
>>>>>>> that works for layer selections.  Language file entries have been
>>>>>>> made.  Only the German translation is currently completed.  There were
>>>>>>> 19 strings - I got tired. :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is basically the beginnings of duplicating the ArcMap layer
>>>>>>> properties functionality.  However, this property sheet is designed to
>>>>>>> work with multiple layers at once.  SkyJUMP has had this for a while,
>>>>>>> but I haven't gotten around to a general release yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> Larry Becker
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Martin Davis
>> Senior Technical Architect
>> Refractions Research, Inc.
>> (250) 383-3022
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
> 
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to