w someone made advertisement for OJ?
keep up the good work!
On 4/1/16 04:25, Michaël Michaud wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, I'm not sure it worthwhile, but I prefer to take the following
graphic as an encouragement.
These figures are probably much distorted by automatic downloads, but
it is the
Hi,
Thanks, I'm not sure it worthwhile, but I prefer to take the following
graphic as an encouragement.
These figures are probably much distorted by automatic downloads, but it
is the first time we
exceeded 4000 downloads a month, and the same month, we nearly reached
5000 (stable
release onl
Yes! Landon is right! Thanks Michael for your job.
2016-03-30 23:00 GMT+02:00 Landon Blake :
> Thanks for your work cleaning the code Michael. I appreciate it.
>
> Landon
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Edgar Soldin wrote:
>
>> On 24.03.2016 13:55, Michaël Michaud wrote:
>> > Thanks,
>> > I
Thanks for your work cleaning the code Michael. I appreciate it.
Landon
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Edgar Soldin wrote:
> On 24.03.2016 13:55, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> > Thanks,
> > I also can undertake some changes with more confidence because I know I
> > can get excellent support on thi
On 24.03.2016 13:55, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Thanks,
> I also can undertake some changes with more confidence because I know I
> can get excellent support on this list either in GIS area or in java
> programming area ;-)
noted :).. happy bunny days.. ede
-
Hi,
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was not frightened at all,
> maybe you should be ;)
Yes of course I can introduce new bugs. The risk is quite low with the
kind of changes I've done since 1.9.1, but I don't exclude to do deeper
changes.
Hopefully, we have a good and stable 1.9.1 release, and it seems a good
On 24.03.2016 11:38, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was not frightened at all,
maybe you should be ;)
>just curious and also glad. Cleaning old code that is not really broken is
>something that usually remains undone.
"never touch a running system"
>Another example is developer "g
Hi,
I was not frightened at all, just curious and also glad. Cleaning old code that
is not really broken is something that usually remains undone. Another example
is developer "goatbar" who has been cleaning the codebase of GDAL with his
+1400 changesets
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/search?q=go
as far as i have seen the changes were more of a formatting natures so far.
but, Jukka is right of course, touching existing working code is prone to
introduce errors.
that being said, i trust you'll be extra careful and try not to introduce new
code if not absolutely needed.
..ede
rOn 24.03.
Hi Jukka,
Some benefits are :
- making the code more readable (with for each loop, generics,
autoboxing : formatting and using simpler syntax help to understand the
code more quickly)
- making the code more safe (using generics, try with resource)
- most of things I rewrite are suggestions fro
Hi,
Michaël seems to do much work with "Cleaning, formatting rewriting". As a
non-programmer I would like to know what and why, and what benefit OpenJUMP
will have from this code review.
Regards,
-Jukka Rahkonen-
--
Tr
11 matches
Mail list logo
