Hi,
I tried to make a list of Sextante vector tools which do not have an equivalent
pair in OpenJUMP. Most of them are made for such analysis or statistics which
do not belong to the core of OpenJUMP and it would probably make no sense to
rewrite them into OpenJUMP. We should just test that the
Hi Ede,
This week, several co-workers have had problems with their java
installation after an automatic update on their windows machine
(problems probably related to the enterprise update policy, not the
standard windows update).
On these machines, JRE is still present somewhere in Program F
Thanks for the hint,
I must definitively have a deeper look at Sextante capabilities,
Michaël
Le 16/11/2016 à 21:29, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) a écrit :
Starting a new thread with better title.
What Michaël was thinking about Sextante actually works already. There
is a rename field process in t
Starting a new thread with better title.
What Michaël was thinking about Sextante actually works already. There is a
rename field process in the vector tools and several renames can be chained
with the graphical modeler. See the attached image. Once the model is saved it
can be used from Sext
>> But if user reads data from database or WFS the new layer has again
schema with long names. That is probably why Michaël has made the
re-usable renaming tool.
Exactly, we have a database with very long attribute names, and simply
truncating them produces un-understandable names.
Michaël
>
Hi,
Attribute names are auto-shortened and if needed, automatically renamed from
the end of the name for avoiding duplicate names. No warnings. Rather user
friendly solution which is also used in GDAL and some other software. Only
drawback is that the result may not please users and they must
tried it on my dual monitor system, seems to be fixed. ..ede
On 15.11.2016 23:15, jump-pilot-...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 5190
> http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5190
> Author: michaudm
> Date: 2016-11-15 22:15:19 + (Tue, 15 Nov 2016)
> Log Message:
> --
what does currently happen when saving shapefiles w/ too long attrib names? do
they get auto shorted, the user a warning or?
..ede
On 15.11.2016 23:44, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Renaming attributes to be compatible with shapefile specification is a
> common need.
> I also had this need
