Re: [julia-users] Re: product of Int64 and Float64 is Int64

2016-10-19 Thread Michele Zaffalon
A bad habit learnt using Python... On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Krisztián Pintér wrote: > > i know i shouldn't, but i'm kinda angry at this "1." notation. saving one > character really worth losing readability? also leading to errors like > this. personally, i would not even allow this synta

[julia-users] Re: product of Int64 and Float64 is Int64

2016-10-19 Thread Steven Sagaert
agreed On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 3:53:00 PM UTC+2, Krisztián Pintér wrote: > > > i know i shouldn't, but i'm kinda angry at this "1." notation. saving one > character really worth losing readability? also leading to errors like > this. personally, i would not even allow this syntax at al

[julia-users] Re: product of Int64 and Float64 is Int64

2016-10-19 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Also https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/11529

[julia-users] Re: product of Int64 and Float64 is Int64

2016-10-19 Thread Steven G. Johnson
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 9:53:00 AM UTC-4, Krisztián Pintér wrote: > > > i know i shouldn't, but i'm kinda angry at this "1." notation. saving one > character really worth losing readability? also leading to errors like > this. personally, i would not even allow this syntax at all. >

Re: [julia-users] Re: product of Int64 and Float64 is Int64

2016-10-19 Thread Tamas Papp
And the same goes for the closely related .1 syntax. Perhaps you could create an issue, if there isn't one already? On Wed, Oct 19 2016, Krisztián Pintér wrote: > i know i shouldn't, but i'm kinda angry at this "1." notation. saving one > character really worth losing readability? also leading t

[julia-users] Re: product of Int64 and Float64 is Int64

2016-10-19 Thread Krisztián Pintér
i know i shouldn't, but i'm kinda angry at this "1." notation. saving one character really worth losing readability? also leading to errors like this. personally, i would not even allow this syntax at all. On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 1:11:38 PM UTC+2, Michele Zaffalon wrote: > > I am conf