agreed
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 3:53:00 PM UTC+2, Krisztián Pintér wrote: > > > i know i shouldn't, but i'm kinda angry at this "1." notation. saving one > character really worth losing readability? also leading to errors like > this. personally, i would not even allow this syntax at all. > > On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 1:11:38 PM UTC+2, Michele Zaffalon wrote: >> >> I am confused by the type of the result of `1.*80`, which is `Int64`, >> despite the fact that `1.` is `Float64`, and that `Float64(1)*80` is a >> `Float64`: >> >
