I use a different method to resolve this problem.
$.blockUI();
setTimeout(funtciont(){...whatever you need to do ... }, 10);
So far, it works fine.
On Aug 28, 10:09 pm, seedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Post runs asynchronously, so the code does not wait for it to finish to
> execute the $.
Thanks, looking forward to UI as well!
Best regards,
Jiming
John Resig 写道:
> Hi Everyone -
>
> jQuery 1.2 has been released!
>
> More information (and a jQuery UI sneak peek!):
> http://jquery.com/blog/2007/09/10/jquery-12-jqueryextendawesome/
>
> Full release notes
Hi Tony,
Great job, thanks!
May I suggest that in multiselect, support SHIFT and CTRL, just like
GMail does. Which means that you can press SHIFT and select a range of
items.
Jiming
Tony wrote:
> I have released a new version of jqGrid.
> Demo page here: http://trirand.com/jqgrid/jqgri
I found the enhancement of prototype and motool is very helpful to
coding.
Anyone agree with me?
Thanks!
Jiming
Cool, thanks:)
Tony wrote:
> Jiming,
>
> I have updated the plugin so that in multi select mode we can use
> SHIFT or CTRL or ALT keys.
> It will be available in the final release
>
> Tony
>
> On 9 Окт, 05:02, Jiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Tony,
Hi,
blockUI is a good plugins. The one thing makes me worried is each time
browser call the blockUI function, the cpu jumped to 30-100% percent?
How can I reduce the CPU consume?
Thanks,
Jiming
I have a suggestion after took a look at the source code.
How about just have a constant DIV, which show and hide instend of
create a brand new one in DOM and remove it again?
On Jul 16, 6:23 pm, Jiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> blockUI is a good plugins. The one
still have a lot of old machine there, and we still need
consider them. What do you say?
Thanks,
Jiming
Hi Mike,
I tried both 1 and 0. And which makes no difference. I suppose that
the main calculation work is in DOM operation.
Thanks,
Jiming
On Jul 18, 12:01 am, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, my corporate firewall won't let me access that site.
>
&g
Hi Mike,
I tried both 0 and 1 and there have no difference.
Thanks,
Jiming
On Jul 18, 12:01 am, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, my corporate firewall won't let me access that site.
>
> Something you can try is to override the opacity by setting the
Hi Mike,
I tried both 0 and 1 and there have no difference.
Thanks,
Jiming
On Jul 18, 12:01 am, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, my corporate firewall won't let me access that site.
>
> Something you can try is to override the opacity by setting the
Hi Mike,
I tried both 0 and 1 and there have no difference.
Thanks,
Jiming
Hi Mike,
I used the old machine visit your site, and it still consume CPU 100%
in 1-2 seconds.
Anyway, I want to let it go, as there do not have lots of people use
this kind of old machine nowadays.
When using a new machine, blockUI is fast enough.
Thanks,
Jiming
On Jul 18, 7:50 pm, "
Hi Alexandre,
Sorry, i did not try your suggestion since i cannot find the images
you said. It
looks as if that blockUI does not use this images as you said.
Thanks,
Jiming
On Jul 18, 8:46 pm, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jiming,
>
> Did you t
I tried the method, it works with $("#myid", parent.document.body);
Thanks for this tip!
Jiming
On Mar 8, 4:03 am, tlphipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I beat my head against this wall for quite some time.
>
> Try this:
> $("#myid", top.document);
>
uch as an
element within the blockui div and have class ".blockui_close". When
click it, unblock will be called.
2. cancelCallback: an call back function if cancel clicked
3. successCallback: an call back function if blockui called instead
of canceled
Thanks!
Jiming
Nobody have this requirement? Cound anyone show me some light on how
to deal with an uncloseable blockUI window please?
On Apr 7, 1:40 pm, Jiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear sir,
>
> From time to time, we might have code which usingblockUIthat cannot
> unblock-ed prop
Great!
It could be even better if you can have some most popular plugins
included.
Thanks,
Jiming
On Jun 3, 2:55 am, Seth - TA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scottus
>
> Nifty idea.
>
> Suggestion - Look to implement plugin options as well. Keeping track
> of versions is
I'm using release version, still very slow
On Jun 20, 3:12 pm, hagalaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm experiencing the same issue. It's definitely something that should
> be pointed out to FF developers. The javascript in the beta version
> was supposed to be 3 times as fast as in FF2.
>
> http
I need unbind the onchange event of a select box, and then set its
value and rebind the onchange function back. But i found the unbind do
not return the binded function. What shall i do?
Thanks
Jiming
20 matches
Mail list logo