Hi Alexandre,

Sorry, i did not try your suggestion since i cannot find the images
you said. It
looks as if that blockUI does not use this images as you said.

Thanks,
Jiming

On Jul 18, 8:46 pm, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jiming,
>
> Did you try increasing the size of all background images having transparent
> pixels?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> Behalf Of Jiming
> Sent: mercredi 18 juillet 2007 10:51
> To: jQuery (English)
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: blockUI plugins consume too much CPU
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I tried both 0 and 1 and there have no difference.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiming
>
> On Jul 18, 12:01 am, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, my corporate firewall won't let me access that site.
>
> > Something you can try is to override the opacity by setting the
> > overlayCSS.opacity value to 0 or 1.  For example:
>
> > $.blockUI.defaults.overlayCSS.opacity = 0;
> > - or -
> > $.blockUI.defaults.overlayCSS.opacity = 1;
>
> > This will tell you if it is the opacity calcs and rendering that are
> > causing the spike.  If so, and you're concerned about those older less
> > powerful machines then you'll need to decide if you can live with a
> > fully opaque or fully transparent solution.  Or if you need to find a
> > different solution altogether.
>
> > Let me know if you see any difference with these settings.
>
> > Mike
>
> > On 7/17/07, Jiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Mike,
>
> > > I am using Windows2000/XP, and browser is IE6/IE7/Firefox2.
>
> > > The url you can try ishttp://peds2.caitco.com, this is a chinese
> > > version, hope . Please just try it at random:)
>
> > > When we using a powerful CPU, it is not a problem. For example my
> > > PC's CPU is AMD2600+. And it only consume about 30% CPU by using IE,
> > > 20% by using FF. AndBlockUIis fast enough.
>
> > > But when my test engineers test the system with an old machine,
> > > which CPU less than 1Gz,blockUIwill make the CPU 100% and need 2-5
> > > seconds to wait even which real operation might only take less than 1
> second.
>
> > > I mean there still have a lot of old machine there, and we still
> > > need consider them. What do you say?
>
> > > Thanks,
>
> > > Jiming- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu.
> Analyse effectuée par AVG.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.10.8/904 - Date: 16/07/2007
> 17:42

Reply via email to