"ok, I will try by the use of ajax but nobody that used getjson had
this problem?"
Everyone and anyone using "$.getJSON" *is* using "$.ajax"
straight from the jQuery file
getJSON: function( url, data, callback ) {
return jQuery.get(url, data, callback, "json");
},
which in turn calls
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Humpty Dumpty wrote:
Thanks, I though that there was a "JSON" solution;
ok, I will try by the use of ajax but nobody that used getjson had
this problem?
As a matter of fact, I just did. As I understand it $.getJSON() seems to
be just a wrapper around an $.ajax() request
Thanks, I though that there was a "JSON" solution;
ok, I will try by the use of ajax but nobody that used getjson had
this problem?
use $.ajax() instead, you can define function when the ajax fails
On Nov 18, 12:17 am, Humpty Dumpty wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I write a web page that retrieve the data from a JSON formatted file
> but when this fiel doesn't exist I can't see any error;
> how I can handle this situation
> thanks
Yeah, I though Michel's reply was a little snippy too. But that aside, he's
right on the specific point that a synchronous Ajax call is to be avoided at
all cost.
It's even worse than he said: In a single-threaded browser like Firefox,
*all* browser windows and tabs are locked up until your Ajax c
As long as you find your way b^^d
Kind regards, and keep us updated.
Michel Belleville
2009/11/6 RayJames
> Man, that felt like an ass chewing but I needed it. :) I am going to
> do some more homework and see how to put the advice you gave me to
> good use. Thanks for your time Michel. I
Man, that felt like an ass chewing but I needed it. :) I am going to
do some more homework and see how to put the advice you gave me to
good use. Thanks for your time Michel. I really appreciate it.
Ray James.
On Nov 5, 2:42 pm, Michel Belleville
wrote:
> 2009/11/5 RayJames
>
> > Hi Michel,
2009/11/5 RayJames
> Hi Michel, I think I might have confused you a bit. The user is not
> necessarily my concern.
Well... Then I guess it's not necessarily a good thing you design UI because
it's all about the user. Ultimately, you're designing machines to work for
humans, and when you're des
Ok, thats how it work. Thanks for your answer. :)
Cheers / David
On Oct 20, 6:38 pm, MorningZ wrote:
> "Why, and how can I make it work??? "
>
> Because you aren't understanding asynchronous behavior...
>
> The script doesn't "wait" for the $.getJSON call to finish before
> continuing on yo
"Why, and how can I make it work??? "
Because you aren't understanding asynchronous behavior...
The script doesn't "wait" for the $.getJSON call to finish before
continuing on you'll need to do your work with "content" inside
the success event, even if that means calling another function pas
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Igor Romero
> Date: September 26, 2009 AM 04:22:07 GMT+08:00
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [jQuery] Re: getJSON callback not firing?
>
> can try this out
>
> function ajaxSucceed(result){
> alert(result.d);
an consider myself at
least a well-versed, basic programmer.
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of MorningZ
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:19 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: getJSON callback not firing?
"the method as "post", occasionally venturing to use "get" when just
retrieving data, just to see what might happen.nothing different. "
Wow, really? knowing the difference between GET an POST are pretty
fundamental things to know as a programmer
http://www.google.com/search?q=get+vs+post
It'
Hang in there, Charlie!
My head was very bloody from banging it against the wall when I first
started
down the AJAX road. Now I'm finally getting some work done with it! I
almost
gave up several times.
fwiw, I have always used the $.ajax method without any problems and
typically specify
$.getJSON is a convenience/wrapper method around the $.ajax call... so
is $.getScript and $.get and $.post
just open up the unpacked version of jQuery and search for "getJSON"
and you'll see this first hand
On Sep 25, 3:07 pm, Charlie Griefer wrote:
> Z: thanks for the response. I'm making my
Z: thanks for the response. I'm making my initial foray into using jQuery
for AJAX (up 'til now, had only used it for page manipulations).
Given your response... would there ever be a situation where .getJSON()
would be preferable to .ajax()? It seems odd that jQuery would have 2
methods that es
I'd suggest using the more generic $.ajax method so you can actually
catch the error, as the $.getJSON fails silently, which is no good for
programmers :-(
$.ajax({
type: GET,
url: "your URL",
processData = true,
data: {},
dataType: "json",
success: function(json) {
Wonderful!
Thanks.
On Sep 20, 12:16 pm, Michael Geary wrote:
> Ah, I did misread the problem. Now I follow you, thanks for the
> clarification.
>
> There is indeed a better and simpler way to do this, which works with
> *any*kind of asynchronous callback. You don't need to rely on having a
> sp
Ah, I did misread the problem. Now I follow you, thanks for the
clarification.
There is indeed a better and simpler way to do this, which works with
*any*kind of asynchronous callback. You don't need to rely on having a
specific
object returned that you can stuff data into. Simply use a closure.
Hi Mike,
I think you might have misread my post and the code attached.
I am quite aware of the fact that the callback function only runs upon
a successful completion of the request and is run asynchronously. If
you look at the code i've written you'll see that i am in fact
_counting_ on that sin
getJSON, like all Ajax and Ajax-style calls, is *asynchronous*. That's what
the A in Ajax stands for.
Instead of trying to use a return value, you need to use the
getJSONcallback function (which you're already providing) to do
whatever you want
with the data.
So your code might look something lik
I guess the surprise was his alert *appeared* to be dependent on the
response size, and "of course" he did not get an error message.
You're giving the right answer to the wrong question. ;-)
Chad's question had nothing to do with limits on GET parameters or the
maximum length of a URL. The parameters were making it to the server just
fine.
The question was about any possible limits on the *response*. This wouldn't
be affected
"GET vs. POST would have nothing to do with this"
Sure it could.
http://classicasp.aspfaq.com/forms/what-is-the-limit-on-querystring/get/url-parameters.html
Granted i do not know if newer browser versions have raised or removed
that cap, but it's still something to consider
To original po
Query
(English)";
Subject: [jQuery] Re: getJSON response limit
Well, the response actually returns, but the jQuery code do
I used json_encode in php to escape the new-lines and all works great
now!
Well, the response actually returns, but the jQuery code doesn't
execute. I've isolated the problem--I have a field in the database
that stores general instructions that can be entered by a user. There
is a carriage return for new-lines in the text that is captured. When
one of these entries is
There is no set limit on the size of a JSON response, any more than there is
on an HTML or XML response. You can have very large JSON responses with no
problem.
GET vs. POST would have nothing to do with this. Those are only different in
the way the request is sent to the server; the response for
Thank you both, I've learned something new today from each of you.
After a number of trials, I think I found the issue. There are some
newline characters in some of the rows fetched from the database. I'm
almost sure this is what is causing all the issues. I'll see if I can
handle them in the ser
Instead of repeating the object name over and over again, you can simplify
the code with an object literal:
$.ajax({
type: 'GET',
url: 'qtool',
processData: true,
data: {
action: 'executeQuery',
entity_name: queryText
},
yes, I'm using firebug and it's really helpful. That's where I got the
sample JSON data (that I gave in my message) from. The response header
shows '200 OK' even when the ajax fails. And I see the json data
returned in the response.
On Jul 10, 11:18 am, MorningZ wrote:
> Also i forgot to add:
>
That JSON looks fine in JSON Viewer as well (awesome tool if you are
on a windows machine: http://www.codeplex.com/JsonViewer)
I'd guess that the content type isn't what jQuery is expecting
Firebug could/would tell you that
"text/plain" or "application/json" is what would be best (and should
Thanks MorningZ. I just tried what you said and I got the alert for
the responseText, which is basically the sample json data I gave in my
listing. That json data looks good to me, but I cant understand why it
failed though. Do you see any issues with that data? The json
validator on www.jsonlint.
Also i forgot to add:
Use Firebug!! it's a HUGE help to help debug AJAX issues
Don't use the $.getJSON method as it, as you are finding out, has no
way to handle an error...
use the generic $.ajax instead
var Params = {};
Params.type = "GET";
Params.url = "qtool";
Params.processData = true;
Params.data = {action: "executeQuery", entity_name: queryText };
Params.dataType =
You mentioned "Access to restricted URI denied", which is a cross-
domain error. Just as an FYI, making a request to a different port
number will trigger this. Something to always keep in mind when
working with ajax.
On Jul 6, 10:09 am, expresso wrote:
> Ok, so their sending back a json response
When you use callback=? jQuery will create a random name for the
anonymous function you pass in. For example:
$.getJSON("CarouselHandler.ashx?jsoncallback=?",function(data) {
});
The actual requested URL will be CarouselHandler.ashx?
jsoncallback=abc12345, and the global variable 'abc12345' wil
Ok, so their sending back a json response wrapped with method foo. So
then how would you specify foo in my example as the method to call on
the getJSON script I've created?
I think my example is fine as it is. We're not going cross server for
now but wanted to understand how to form this and ho
Thanks. I'm not following you though per my example. I have
specified function(data) as the method
On Jul 6, 10:56 am, Bill Ramirez wrote:
> If you pass a param to the json call, it gets passed into the
> querystring:
>
> $.getJSON("jsdata/customerhandler.ashx", { show: Math.random(),
> depart
If you pass a param to the json call, it gets passed into the
querystring:
$.getJSON("jsdata/customerhandler.ashx", { show: Math.random(),
departmentId: dptId}, customerLoaded);
would be rendered as:
jsdata/customerhandler.ashx?show=0.23231553&departmentId=123
the second parameter to the getJs
For JSONP, the server needs to wrap the response in the supplied
callback. The cross-domain getJSON function is basically appending a
script to the page, with the contents of that script being a function
containing the data you want to pass back. Play around with the URL in
the flickr example from
Adding a "&jsoncallback=?" or "&callback=?" got rid of the Access to
restricted URI denied" code: "1012 but I get no data showing in my
plug-in when adding either of those querystring params to my url. So
I don't get it. I thought that it's supposed to automatically
replace ? with function(data)
Adding a "&jsoncallback=?" or "&callback=?" got rid of the Access to
restricted URI denied" code: "1012 but I get no data showing in my
plug-in when adding either of those querystring params to my url. So
I don't get it. I thought that it's supposed to automatically
replace ? with function(data)
It uses a GET request, so yes, it converts the name:value pairs into a
querystring. Fiddler's fine but you can view the request in Firebug
(which overall has more value for web development).
On Jun 29, 8:00 pm, expresso wrote:
> http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.getJSON
>
> I don't get what it
to backtrack previous to my last post with the second error, I had to
encode the string to get it working. Encoding got rid of the \u00
which it looked like jQuery did not like?
On Jun 29, 9:25 am, MorningZ wrote:
> The fact it is escaped could be an issue
>
> are you doing HttpUtility.HtmlEnc
Fixed it. I actually needed to Encode it before.
However now I have a second problem with the following code:
$.getJSON("http://localhost:59396/xxx/xxxHandler.ashx?
action=xxxjson",
function(Data) {
$.each(Data.items, function(i, item) {
alert('got here');
ca
The fact it is escaped could be an issue
are you doing HttpUtility.HtmlEncode in your handler for some reason?
Do you know about NewtonSoft's Json.NET library that makes it a snap
to generate JSON from .NET classes?
On Jun 29, 10:07 am, expresso wrote:
> I have the following setup on my page
In a GET request the length of the URL is also browser dependent. IE
has the shortest (at least as of IE7) at 2,083 characters with no more
than 2,048 in the path portion. A non-scientific 2006 test showed
Firefox to accept at least 100,000 characters, Safari at 80,000
characters, Opera at 190,000
Maybe you hit the timeout for AJAX in jQuery?
Try:
$.ajaxSetup({
timeout: 1
});
It will change AJAX timeout to 10 seconds.
Or you can try to do this by $.ajax method where you can specify the
timeout.
On Jun 26, 12:07 pm, "saa...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to send with getJ
Hi,
There is a byte limit (2048) on the size of a url set in the server
configuration (I think specific t IIS but maybe apache too) , if you
dont have access to change these you will have to use POST to submit
your string.
On 26 Jun 2009, at 11:07, saa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am try
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: getJSON flicker works but not mine -- URGENT HELP
>
>
>
> Since I can't debug pretty much on the server-side, I'd suspect that
> somehow the data coming from flickr is more clean than from your host.
>
> I also get the f
Since I can't debug pretty much on the server-side, I'd suspect that
somehow the data coming from flickr is more clean than from your host.
I also get the following error, indicating most likely a problem parsing
the json data:
Error: invalid label
Source File:
http://include.classistatic.com/i
Etienne,
I'm using getJSON because I need to do cross-domain data fetching. I
thought getJSON is the best way for doing that from reading the docs.
No error messages show up in FF. In HTTP watch, I see the JSON content
coming throw as
{
"title": "Recent Uploads tagged cat",
Hi dtrann,
I never tried the $.getJSON method before but generally have better
results using the plain $.ajax method. If you switch to that
alternative, you should also pay attention to specifying the "json"
dataType param. Oh and what is the error message reported ? ;-)
Hope this helps,
Etienn
Ok, solved the problem using htmlentities() in all variables before
assingnig them to smarty.
everything is set to use utf-8.
though i've notice now, first time i call the getJSON, on $
(document).ready, the response comes fine, with the right chars.
the problem happens whe i click a button that calls the method again,
witch is meant to perform a search.
On 16 Jun, 19:23, James wrote:
>
Make sure the page your Javascript is on is also also uses utf-8
content-type (e.g. in meta tags). Same for your PHP script.
On Jun 16, 1:45 am, Obi1 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'am having a bit of a problem with special chars in a getJSON
> response which is the result from php and smarty
>
> the file ca
I noticed something...instead of parsing a json object I think it is
trying to parse an xml docit is hitting the catch. I think I know
what the issue is. This project was designed to work on a servlet
engine and I'm running it via IIS 7the web config needs to have
appropriate settings. Wil
Thanks so much...much cleaner. The json is generated fine
( [{"value":"","caption":"choose color"},
{"value":"bk","caption":"Black"}] ) but the drop downs are still not
populating. Here's the after call returns:
It appears that jQuery has touch the element but there are no options.
On May 2
yck handcrafting JSON is a pain, thankfully
there's great stuff out there by people who have thought of how to
help, so some advice:
grab this .NET component and drop it in your BIN directory:
http://www.codeplex.com/json (note the new version only works
with .NET 3.5, grab t
yck
Advice: grab this .NET component and drop it in your BIN directory:
http://www.codeplex.com/json (note the new version only works
with .NET 3.5, grab the older one if you're in 2.0)
then you can stay thinking like .NET and objects
Class for each item
Private Class
Thanks for the reply. I changed it so that processData is declared
before $(document).ready. Unfortunately, however, the function still
does not seem to be called.
getJSON must be doing the right thing, because I can see the data I'm
trying to get when I go to the Net panel in Firebug and look in
Al wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get some data as JSON, and want to show a spinning
animation while doing so. I have the following jQuery/HTML:
http://dpaste.com/46873/
The URL I pass to getJSON returns some data e.g. {'data': '123456789'}
and seems to be working properly and returning valid JSON.
De: "iceangel89"
i still cant out put anything even with a simple alert(json);
-
You must loop through data in order to retrieve their values:
$.getJSON("data.js", function (json) {var allItems =
json.length;$.each(jso
ok i solved it, it shld be something like
{ "departments": { "department": {"ID": 1, "Name": "Physics"},
"department": {"ID": 2, "Name": "Chemistry"
}, "department": {"ID": 3, "Name": "Biology"},}}
instead, use of {} and
"departments": d: {xxx}, d: {yyy}, d: {zzz}
am i right to say all these ar
i still cant out put anything even with a simple alert(json);
in firebug i see that ... below ... is returned
[
{"Value": 1, "Item": "Physics"},
{"Value": 2, "Item": "Chemistry"},
{"Value": 3, "Item": "Biology"}
];
On Mar 26, 5:34 pm, jakenoble wrote:
> Shouldn't your JSON return values be dou
Shouldn't your JSON return values be double quoted"?
[ {"Value": 1, "Item": "Physics"}, {"Value": 2, "Item": "Chemistry"},
{"Value": 3, "Item": "Biology"} ];
On Mar 26, 9:16 am, iceangel89 wrote:
> i am trying to load json. but it seems like its not working. nothing
> is alerted. supposed to be
osh Powell"
Para: "jQuery (English)"
Enviada em: sábado, 21 de março de 2009 17:16
Assunto: [jQuery] Re: getJSON() response into a table
$.getJSON("url", function(json){
$(json).each(function(){
row = $("#table").append("");
$(row).append(""
> $.getJSON("url", function(json){
> $(json).each(function(){
> row = $("#table").append("");
> $(row).append("").html(json.cell1.value);
> $(row).append("").html(json.cell2.value);
> });
> });
>
> something like this?
This is a very, very, very... very slow way to append
var html = ''
[SOLVED]
Maurício
-Mensagem Original-
De: "Maujor"
Para:
Enviada em: sábado, 21 de março de 2009 13:09
Assunto: [jQuery] getJSON() response into a table
I'm trying to display data from a json request into a table.
Table heading disapear when the request finishes and I can't figu
have you got firebug?
use the inspector to find out what it produces.
From: css.mau...@gmail.com
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: getJSON() response into a table
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:23:31 -0300
Hi Joseph,
Thanks, but this didn't solve.
Any ideas?
Mau
Hi Joseph,
Thanks, but this didn't solve.
Any ideas?
Maurício
-Mensagem Original-
De: Joseph Le Brech
Para: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Enviada em: sábado, 21 de março de 2009 13:23
Assunto: [jQuery] Re: getJSON() response into a table
$.getJSON("url"
$.getJSON("url", function(json){
$(json).each(function(){
row = $("#table").append("");
$(row).append("").html(json.cell1.value);
$(row).append("").html(json.cell2.value);
});
});
something like this?
sorry im just coding this blind from my email account.
>
yes $.getJSON does do eval internally
so what your trying to accomplish is, trying to eval a string into
javascript object but u dont want to write eval() everywhere right?
or i misunderstood your question in anyway?
Steven, I am doing the same way as you said using eval and storing the
string in JS variable.
I may be wrong but as per my understanding $.getJSON also does eval()
internally.
Just wanted to do pure implementation only through $.getJSON without
using eval() custom JS method.
Thanks
Mohammed Ari
Sorry if i am mistaken in anywaybut $.getJSON is suppose to be for getting
JSON data from remote server or simply server, but not for you to eval a
String into javascript object. And from the source of jQuery I believe it
will simply to eval('('+json+')') anyway.
And if you want to do it that way,
Thanks for the code snippet Josh. It's exactly what I was looking
for. Certainly load works as well. At this point I am trying to
understand various options for producing data on an intranet. In the
past I have written asp pages which format the HTML and then use ajax
(with or without jquery)
What I don't like about that method is the loss of ease of updating
and reuse of code later on. If you stick it in a table coming back,
and need the some data somewhere else you cannot reuse it. Also,
changing things on server side requires recompiling in a java
environment, which is a drag for
Then I must be missing something:
$("#placetoinsert").load("path/to/url");
would do the same thing, with the tableHTML constructed on the server
side.
On Mar 14, 5:02 pm, Josh Powell wrote:
> Because it puts it in the javascript and lets you easily manipulate it
> with javascript. If you get
Because it puts it in the javascript and lets you easily manipulate it
with javascript. If you get html back from the server, it's more
difficult to manipulate.
$.getJson('path/to/url', function(data) {
var tableHTML = '';
$.each(data.aaData, function() {
tableHTML += '' + this
If that's all your going to do with it, why not return a table from
the server and simply .load() it? No transformation required in that
case.
On Mar 14, 9:23 am, finco wrote:
> Sorry if this is a duplicate post - doesn't look like the last one
> went through.
>
> I've seen several examples of
My guess is that you could still do it if you globally set async to
false. Wouldn't recommend it though.
David
James wrote:
Yes, David is right. My example would not work. Sorry about that.
For other jQuery AJAX functions, there's an option to set 'async' to
false if you do want to let your
parentDiv.innerHTML = '';
/
var header = document.createElement('h2');
header.innerHTML = 'Select Hold Baggage Carrier';
parentDiv.appendChild(header);
/
parentDiv.innerHTML = '';
/
var header = document.createElement('h2');
header.innerHTML = 'Select Hold Baggage Carrier';
parentDiv.appendChild(header);
/
Well, it's for sure code related and how you wired up these
events.
But without seeing the code, it's very difficult to help diagnose
On Mar 6, 1:15 pm, Hill wrote:
> This is probably a simple problem, but I can't seem to find the fix.
>
> I have three getJSON events that work inside of a t
Yes, David is right. My example would not work. Sorry about that.
For other jQuery AJAX functions, there's an option to set 'async' to
false if you do want to let your script halt until the AJAX response
is received. I don't think there's an option for getJSON for that, so
you'll have to do every
You need to include what you want to do within the callback:
$(function(){
var youtubeurl;
$.getJSON('data.inc.json', function(j){
youtubeurl = j.video_url;
so = new SWFObject(j.video_url, "TEST", "498", "278", "9.0.28","#00",
"true");
//etc...
});
that's not the problem unfortunately, cause my real script is
different.
The problem must be connected to the way $.getJSON parses the data
On 5 Mrz., 21:11, James wrote:
> The scope of your youtubeurl variable exists only within the callback
> function of your getJSON(). Set the variable ou
The scope of your youtubeurl variable exists only within the callback
function of your getJSON(). Set the variable outside first.
$(function(){
var youtubeurl;
$.getJSON('data.inc.json', function(j){
youtubeurl = j.video_url;
});
so = new SWFObject(youtubeurl, "TES
My project has an example of getJSON() here.
http://code.google.com/p/ajaxmmo/source/browse/trunk/src/static/default.js#105
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 03:12:34 -0800
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: $.getJSON
> From: seas...@gmail.com
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
>
>
>
Using console.log and firebug will show you what everything is.
console.log(data);
$.each(data.records, function(i,item){
console.log(i);
console.log(item);
console.log(this);
});
On Mar 2, 1:54 am, Alain Roger wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Matt Quackenbush wrote:
>
>
>
> >
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Matt Quackenbush wrote:
> Yes.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Alain Roger wrote:
>
>> Hi Wil,
>>
>> so if i understood well, having the following JSON:
>>
>>> {"records":[{"id":1,"abbreviation":"fre","description":"french"},{"id":2,"abbreviation":"eng","de
Yes.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Alain Roger wrote:
> Hi Wil,
>
> so if i understood well, having the following JSON:
>
>> {"records":[{"id":1,"abbreviation":"fre","description":"french"},{"id":2,"abbreviation":"eng","description"
>> :"english"},{"id":3,"abbreviation":"ger","description":"ge
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Wil Everts wrote:
>
> One of my favorite examples of this is the Flickr example on Visual
> jQuery (http://remysharp.com/visual-jquery/).
>
> $.getJSON("
> http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?tags=cat&tagmode=any&format=json&jsoncallback=
> ?",
>
One of my favorite examples of this is the Flickr example on Visual
jQuery (http://remysharp.com/visual-jquery/).
$.getJSON("http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?tags=cat&tagmode=any&format=json&jsoncallback=?";,
function(data){
$.each(data.items, function(i,item){
$
You can try $.ajaxSetup ({ cache: false});
Cheers
On 17 Feb, 13:26, Hernando Gisinger wrote:
> May be $.postJSON work too!!!
>
> 2009/2/17 IanW
>
>
>
> > Sorry all, I've fixed this now by just appending the time on the end
> > of the request to make it appear differerent to IE each time, this
May be $.postJSON work too!!!
2009/2/17 IanW
>
> Sorry all, I've fixed this now by just appending the time on the end
> of the request to make it appear differerent to IE each time, this
> seems to work!
>
> On Feb 17, 11:49 am, IanW wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've got an application developed in ASP.N
Sorry all, I've fixed this now by just appending the time on the end
of the request to make it appear differerent to IE each time, this
seems to work!
On Feb 17, 11:49 am, IanW wrote:
> Hi,
> I've got an application developed in ASP.NET MVC using jQuery to
> handle JSON requests and responses.
>
A JSON object can only contain either other objects, arrays, numbers
or strings. In your case the #test is just a text string, not an
element. So yes, you need to append it to the document so that it's
parsed and becomes part of the DOM tree. But you can also create the
element without appending i
"how can i talk to an html object $('#test') that is in the JSON
Object. "
That doesn't make any sense $("#test") will be a DOM object, not
a "JSON Object"
On Jan 25, 2:35 pm, Trend-King wrote:
> hello, i have another question about JSON i received the JSON Objekts
> well, so my question
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
