顶一下
顶
You're making MooTools sound like it's a fork from Prototype.
I'd argue that there's fundamental and code differences between the
two.
Mitchell, I believe the impressions MooTools leave should be
experienced rather than explained :-\.
-Olmo Maldonado
MooTools Developer
http://mootools.net/
On
i think that most important aspect is: jquery is more community
driven...
just paly around with its countless plugins, and also people here to
discuss jquery related matters 24x7x365
i think the answer is clear that jquery is the way to go.
On 8月4日, 下午11時48分, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTEC
djeiquéri = brazilian LOL
On 8/7/07, Mika Tuupola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
>
> > say-ferry = American
> > say-kweery = UK
>
> gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
>
> --
> Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/
- Original Message ----
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Jquery Vs. Prototype
From: Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Date: 8/7/2007 1:10 PM
>
> Joel Birch wrote:
>>
>> On 07/08/2007, at 5:35 PM, Mika Tuupola wrote:
>>>
>>>> say-ferry =
Am Dienstag, 7. August 2007 schrieb Klaus Hartl:
> Joel Birch wrote:
> > On 07/08/2007, at 5:35 PM, Mika Tuupola wrote:
> >>> say-ferry = American
> >>> say-kweery = UK
> >>
> >> gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
> >
> > jah-ee-kweery = Australian
>
> jä-kwärrie = german ;-)
ha? = bavarian ;-)
C
Joel Birch wrote:
On 07/08/2007, at 5:35 PM, Mika Tuupola wrote:
say-ferry = American
say-kweery = UK
gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
jah-ee-kweery = Australian
jä-kwärrie = german ;-)
--Klaus
On 07/08/2007, at 5:35 PM, Mika Tuupola wrote:
say-ferry = American
say-kweery = UK
gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
jah-ee-kweery = Australian
On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
say-ferry = American
say-kweery = UK
gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
--
Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/
say-ferry = American
say-kweery = UK
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Tobias Parent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 5:26 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Jquery Vs. Prototype
I feel like such a n00b - I've always pronounced it to rhyme with
I feel like such a n00b - I've always pronounced it to rhyme with
'say-ferry' .
DOH!
- Toby
It's not just that you got to call it "j" and then "query". And
it's not just that the word query is hard to pronounce on its own:
say "kweer-ee" really fast. You sound like a Disney ch
kind of tool. I'm not suggesting a name change,
> just pointing out what I think will hold it back.
>
>
>
> *From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Ganeshji Marwaha
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 04, 2007 10:47 PM
> *To:* jquery-en@go
Brook,
>For example, in prototype, adds these methods to the form element
>(http://www.prototypejs.org/api/form
>):
>
>disable enable findFirstElement focusFirstElement getElements
>getInputs request reset serialize serializeElements
As already stated by others, a lot of the those functions can
Hi,
I'll put it this way: I've been using JavaScript for quite some time -
begining with a small game in 1997. I've looked at a lot of libraries over
the time and always thought: "take out the stuff I don't need and I get the
rest much smaller than this stuff". jQuery was the first time this w
neshji Marwaha
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 10:47 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Jquery Vs. Prototype
brook,
I am not sure if i will add substantially to what others have said above.
Still, i wanted to post this mail anyways because you might be more
comfortable
brook,
I am not sure if i will add substantially to what others have said above.
Still, i wanted to post this mail anyways because you might be more
comfortable making a decision if you hear an opinion from a normal user as
opposed to a core developer.
My background in javascript follows the patt
BMHO, jquery is easier to learn and doesn't extends native JS objects. jQ
people is more enthusiatsic about library they use. Also, jQuery put
standards in speed, documentation and support. By introducing jQuery, John
forced other folks to improve their libraries. And comunity is very
devoted, too
> I can see the benefit of this being that you only include the methods you
> need and there is no bloat.
That's precisely why. Here's examples of everything that you mentioned:
disable:
$("input").attr("disabled","disabled");
enable:
$("input").attr("disabled","");
findFirstElement:
$("form
Hi Brook,
All of the functionality is available to jQuery users but not all of it
is in the core. One of the things that we try to do is really keep the
core clean and lightweight.
With that said, jQuery team member Mike Alsup has created a form
handling plugin which is complimentary to jQu
20 matches
Mail list logo
