Ganeshji:
Very nice story! I really enjoyed reading it. And learned what I already suspected. You just saved me a LOT of wasted time checking out those other frameworks. Mitch PS In some ways its unfortunate, not terrible, just too bad, that jQuery choose such a techie and obscure name to describe itself. It's not just that you got to call it "j" and then "query". And it's not just that the word query is hard to pronounce on its own: say "kweer-ee" really fast. You sound like a Disney character. The reason is that no one knows it means. Of course us techie's do. Mootools is a silly name but at least you a) can pronounce it and b) know it's some kind of tool. I'm not suggesting a name change, just pointing out what I think will hold it back. From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ganeshji Marwaha Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 10:47 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Jquery Vs. Prototype brook, I am not sure if i will add substantially to what others have said above. Still, i wanted to post this mail anyways because you might be more comfortable making a decision if you hear an opinion from a normal user as opposed to a core developer.
