Is anyone else trying to use jQuery on the iPhone? I'm doing a game
using PhoneGap for iPhone and iPod Touch (with the hope of moving on
to other phones). Everything was going swimmingly until I tried a
mousedown event. Works correctly in PC and Mac versions of Safari, but
no event occurs until th
Nevermind. Sat down with jQuery in Action and found two
solutions. .find() and adding a parameter to $(). Funny I never did
that before in jQuery.
On Nov 9, 9:22 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a mostly-jQuery, sometimes Dojo user. I just came off a Dojo
> contract a
I am a mostly-jQuery, sometimes Dojo user. I just came off a Dojo
contract and one thing I ended up using a lot was Dojo's ability to do
a query starting at a given node (subtree) of the DOM.
Now I'm on a jQuery project and I find that I don't know how to do
that in jQuery. Suppose I have done a
There was an earlier discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/4480f62e57bd7e82?tvc=2&q=detect+whether+images
On Sep 7, 12:58 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all,
> i need to know, how can i indicate with javascript if the client
> browser
I went the other way, from computations on the server to computations
on the client. Here's why: if you have a large number of players, your
server costs will become a real problem. But the number of clients
available to do calculations expands with the number of players, and
client CPU time costs
Yeah, this doesn't make sense. Either the HTML is served (exists) or
it's created on the fly in some way later on by JavaScript.
On Sep 5, 8:01 am, S P Arif Sahari Wibowo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, lukas wrote:
> > My PHP code creates a button which doesn't exist when my pag
Is there really a lot of code that relies on it? If there is, wouldn't
Chrome break on many more pages? I don't recall seeing any code that
assumes an order.
--tt
On Sep 4, 1:32 pm, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yes, but every other implementation does that, so a lot of code
>
That linked page does say, "jQuery generally works with Konqueror and
Firefox 1.0.x,..."
But in my experience, it's always a disaster. Maybe it did mostly work
with an older jQuery. I think it should be changed to say that jQuery
DOES NOT generally work in Konqueror.
On Sep 4, 5:23 am, MorningZ
I don't think many read language specs, but I've heard over and over
(in books and online) that you can't rely on the order that you get
when you use "in" to set through keys. I thought that was fairly well
known. Nothing in the syntax hints that you'd get them in a certain
order.
However, obviou
I read the linked article, and did not interpret it the way you did.
Certainly John does not come right out and say that TraceMonkey is
much better, and he probably knows that if he did, we'd take it with a
grain of salt since he works for Mozilla. (Note, though, that John
isn't on the TraceMonkey
That was me. I was up all night trying every site I could think of.
On Sep 3, 1:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wonder how come google load pages half the time that firefox 3.0 does ...
> thats so interesting..right now I use firefox for its firebug and plugins
> and I use safari 3 because it
ebug)
{firebug.init();}else{setTimeout(arguments.callee);}})
();void(firebug);
On Sep 2, 4:52 pm, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From timothytoe
> > I'm not 100% sure, but I think you misread Matt's post. Matt
> > seemed to be saying the same t
I'm not 100% sure, but I think you misread Matt's post. Matt seemed to
be saying the same thing you are--the order of keys should not be
relied upon.
On Sep 2, 4:26 pm, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Matt Kruse wrote:
>
> > > This appears to be a bad assumption in the jQuery tes
I have a very large app that works perfectly in Chrome (with lots of
jQuery and jQuery plugs), so the omens are good. One computationally
intensive bit takes 14 seconds in FF3 and 7 in Chrome. Amazing.
On Sep 2, 12:45 pm, Guyon Morée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With all the buzz around
That sounds suspiciously like what Safari does in some cases:
http://dreaminginjavascript.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/a-challenge/
On Sep 2, 2:49 pm, Matt Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2:45 pm, Guyon Morée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Even though, Chrome seems to be a little bit
I'm still waiting to find something reasonable.
On Jul 5, 3:49 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did you find the History Plugin which You need I have the same Problem
> with Bookmarking
>
> On May 30, 6:11 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Great. I&
>>Also, the jQuery file only has to be transfered once to each person
that used it. Then the browser just uses the cached file.
Well, that depends on a lot of things. :-)
I recently read a blog post (I think one of the Ajaxian guys) that
said maybe the first Monday of the month, we could point out that
modern browsers work better. I think an alert would be overkill,
unless the site really is unbearable in IE6. But maybe its is about
time for a little star or someth
Where my brother works, IE6 is mandated by IT. The employees are not
allowed to update.
I know. Irritating.
On Jun 8, 11:55 am, tudorizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Made this quick alert box for
> IE6:http://tudorizer.wordpress.com/2008/06/08/anti-ie6/
> For those preistoric guys who want to
Is there a clever way to do JSON encoding and decoding in jQuery
without AJAX and without a form? Does all the serialization in jQuery
imply transmission via AJAX?
All I want is object -> string and string -> object.
Great. I'll keep my eyes peeled.
On May 30, 7:55 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 30, 1:35 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes. Oh well.
>
> > Where should I watch for updates? Will there be an update of history
> >
Tabs?
>
> http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Tabs#Does_UI_Tabs_support_back_button_and_b...
>
> --Klaus
>
> On May 28, 6:11 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ajax History doesn't seem to be working for me.
>
> > I'm including the file (which I've t
Ajax History doesn't seem to be working for me.
I'm including the file (which I've thrown into my jQuery directory...
And I've initialized the history (right after document.ready)...
$.ajaxHistory.initialize();
I'm using a recent version of the Tabs plugin.
Also, I'm adding entries as list elements to a UL. Is there a clever
way to keep someone from adding the same thing twice?
On Apr 2, 9:28 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying a few different versions of this plug-in. It's nice,
> but the very
I've been trying a few different versions of this plug-in. It's nice,
but the very first thing I have to do is override the colors.
.ac_over {
background-color: #fed;
color: #012;
. (e.g. no counter in on the callback)
>
> To the OP: can you post more details about what you're trying to do
> when you end up with so many callbacks? It sounds like things could be
> make cleaner using objects and callback methods instead of having tons
> of nesting code blocks
Tricky.
If I were you, what I'd try next would be using jQuery's css() to
change to rtl in a setTimeout() call. Sounds stupid, but it might help
you narrow down the problem. I've had odd problems with browsers not
rendering anything until they come up for air, and doing things inside
a setTimer()
I had a case where I had to wait for n records to come from the
server. They all had the same callback, which incremented a
counter.and checked to see if this load was the last one. It worked,
but I have thought about giving the whole lists of requests to the
server at once and having the server p
, s.url, s.async, s.username, s.password);
>
> the debugger says, "Breaking on JScript runtime error - Permission
> denied"
>
> --adam
>
> On Mar 6, 9:40 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hehe. I _really_ hope the JScript gets faster in upco
Scratch that. During the long calculation I show a chart to keep
people from being bored. It's negligible in FF, but turns out to be a
huge cost in IE (using excanvas). So I'm going to only show it in IE
1/4 as often. Still have to give people something to look at.
On Mar 6, 6:40 am,
Hehe. I _really_ hope the JScript gets faster in upcoming releases. It
seems as if their DOM stuff got faster but I haven't checked.
On Mar 6, 12:47 am, Michael Stuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> timothytoe schrieb:> One thing I noticed is that the JavaScript is still
> pai
One thing I noticed is that the JavaScript is still painfully slow,
but perhaps there is a lot of debug stuff in there slowing it down.
What takes 7 seconds in Safari and 8 in Firefox 3b3 takes 25 seconds
in IE8! (28 seconds in IE6).
On Mar 5, 2:54 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/ie8/readiness/Install.htm
On Mar 5, 2:52 pm, "Benjamin Sterling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim, can you point me to the download link?
>
> On 3/5/08, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
&g
It seemed to overwrite IE7, but it has an IE7 mode. I only did it on
one computer.
On Mar 5, 1:41 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did IE8 overwrite IE7 or can it work standalone?
>
> Rey
>
> timothytoe wrote:
> > I was pretty excited to download IE8 today.
I was pretty excited to download IE8 today. All the jQuery stuff in my
app seems to work fine.
The debugger is pretty nice. I've always had trouble finding bugs in
IE.
Anyone find any IE8 jQuery problems yet?
You may find this article interesting...
http://osteele.com/archives/2006/04/javascript-memoization
On Mar 2, 11:50 pm, howa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider I have a simple plugin, e.g.
>
> jQuery.example = function(name) {
>
> sayHello = function(str) {
> alert("jQuery
I don't think there have been 4 or 5 topics. If there have been, I've
missed most of them. I remember one topic where someone was asking
about what books to read. And I started a kudos for the jQuery In
Action book. If there have been any others, I missed them and I'd like
to read them.
By the wa
>>jQuery in Action
>>Bear Bibeault, Yehuda Katz
>>http://www.amazon.com/jQuery-Action-Bear-Bibeault/dp/1933988355
I sent a shout out this morning on this list about that one. I love it.
It's very well done. Just got my preorder from Amazon yesterday. Read
some of it last night and flipped through more of it this morning.
I already feel illuminated.
he
> (X)HTML is parsed and turned into the DOM tree. There's no need for
> keeping around the quotes, '/>' or other "delimiters" as each of the
> elements now exists as a node, not as some textual representation.
>
> Karl Rudd
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008
Not sure this is 100% jQuery's problem.
I do this:
$("#logo").html("");
But what lands in the browser is this:
Interestingly, the single quotes have been converted to double quotes
and the trailing " /" has been lost, which kills my validation.
Is it jQuery being funny here or the browser i
Do you know the list of names? Or are you trying to identify what
might be a name on the page (say two words in a row with initial
caps)?
On Feb 23, 12:35 pm, sspboyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> I want to find specific names (I have a list of 320 names in an xml
> file). I want to sca
Thanks, Dave. You just gave me a stomach ache.
I just fought the browsers for two days to get my interface working
with all the mouseup and mousedown stuff. I eventually got it all
working, but only on Windows. I have not tested the Mac browsers yet.
I'll be interested in what you come up with.
That makes sense.
But it doesn't negate the fact that 'Google' Groups had funky response
yesterday. I hit it several times when 'Google' Groups apologized
because the boards were down, and once it came up in what looked like
a low-bandwidth version of the 'Google' Groups page.
No messages for 15
more insight on the differences between
> those 2 pieces of code...
>
> On Feb 23, 2:05 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't know if there's any practical difference. Maybe someone more
> > knowledgeable can chime it. Perhaps the former e
{ alert('something'); }
> jQuery.test = {
> abc: function() { alert('test'); }
>
> }
>
> Besides the syntax used of course. I mean, you simply do $.something()
> or $.test.abc() and it will work no matter if you coded in the first
> way or secon
Any time you create a function without a name it's anonymous. Example:
window.setTimeout(function() { alert('Hello world!') }, 60);
On Feb 22, 4:56 pm, Nazgulled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> timothytoe wrote:
> > The function doesn't have a name, so it doe
in JavaScript, and
being able to pass any object as a parameter. A function is an object
in JavaScript and can be passed as a parameter.
It's very powerful.
On Feb 22, 4:39 pm, Nazgulled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And what exactly it means to hide a function, making it anonymous?
&
JavaScript has really expressive ways to call functions. The first
parentheses hide the function (make it anonymous) and the second
executes the code immediately with the parameter listed. I'm a newbie
myself, but I think that means "right now, pass the variable jQuery in
as $ to the function and
I think Google had some gas. There was a giant burp of messages a
short while ago.
On Feb 22, 8:41 am, gh0st <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does it take so long for a new topic to be posted? It really is
> frustrating esp, if you want answers to questions.
Did you see my recent thread here? My experience has been nightmarish.
On Feb 22, 12:47 pm, jquertil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TT thanks a lot! for this - it works.
>
> Interesting comparison: the jQuery version of my dragger is 23 lines
> of code inluding all callbacks.
> The plain javascript
Obviously, There was a typo. Fixed:
1.
var i;
for (i=0;i<5;i++) {
setTimeout(function() {alert('first '+i);},5000);
}
2.
for (i=0;i<5;i++) {
(function(num) {
setTimeout(function() {alert('second '+num);},
500
. :-)
On Feb 22, 11:06 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's an interesting thing to try.
>
> My problem is a bit more severe because the items I am moving are divs
> that actually have elements attached to them as labels.
>
> Last night I looked at the jQ
s, or rejected it for a very good reason, but I
> thought I'd throw it out there, just in case it might help.
>
> --Karl
> _
> Karl Swedbergwww.englishrules.comwww.learningjquery.com
>
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:50 AM, timothytoe wrote:
>
>
>
> > I
I've just been through this. preventDefault() in mousedown will keep
Firefox from selecting text as you drag.
This mousemove crap is the only place in my code where I check the
browser. I'm sure it depends on the functionality you're trying to
block, but for me it worked something like this (code
For most simple cases, I use a prefix of a unary plus to convert
strings to numbers. It's short. It's easy to read once you're used to
doing it. I haven't tested the speed, but it may be faster as well.
>>> typeof("1");
"string"
>>> typeof(+"1");
"number"
var startmin = (+$("timestartmin").text(
ning false) and mitigate the framerate issues in
other ways. It's a shame. No other browser is detrimentally affected
in performance by disallowing text selection.
If this happens to you, you're not nuts, or at least no more nuts than
I am.
On Feb 21, 5:08 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PR
I think you're having trouble with a closure. It's a common problem
and I recently got help on it myself.
JavaScript looks like C, but it's not C (or Java). You'll probably
keep running into this kind of thing until you understand closures, so
go ahead and search for "javascript closure" on googl
browser DOM
> object.
>
> if (jQuery.browser.msie) {
> domNode.get(0).ondrag = function () { return false; };
> domNode.get(0).onselectstart = function () { return false; };
>
> }
>
> - Eli Cochran
> user interaction developer
> ETS, UC Berkeley
>
> On Feb
Never mind. The answer has to do with jQuery's $().offset() function.
I got it.
On Feb 21, 12:05 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I get the position of a mouse within a div when I'm getting
> events from mousemove? If it helps, I'm already includ
How do I get the position of a mouse within a div when I'm getting
events from mousemove? If it helps, I'm already including
dimensions.js for the myriad extensions that want it. I understand
that I can get pageX or clientX but what I want is X inside that DIV
where I have mousemove tracking on..
msie) {
> domNode.get(0).ondrag = function () { return false; };
> domNode.get(0).onselectstart = function () { return false; };
>
> }
>
> - Eli Cochran
> user interaction developer
> ETS, UC Berkeley
>
> On Feb 20, 5:23 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll have to either live with the startups, or spend some time
> killing them ;) Thanks for the heads-up TT!
>
> The page looks the same in Safari as in Firefox & ie (phew!).
>
> So what's up with Opera?
>
> On Feb 21, 1:54 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Safari for Windows is a pretty good browser now, especially if you
want to have a good idea whether you'll run on Mac Safari (and
iPhone). Is there a reason you're not testing with it as well?
On Feb 20, 3:45 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Admittedly, the function in questio
; mousemove? I seem to recall that helped me in a similar situation.
>
> $("#actionSurface").mousemove(function(e){
> ... save off current x and y ...
> ... move shit around
> return false; <--- add this
> });
>
> -- Josh
>
> - Original
Cool.
On Feb 18, 10:51 am, Mika Tuupola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:15 PM, timothytoe wrote:
>
> > Looks like 4 layers there. Anyone look at the code yet? Is there
> > Javascript controlling the positioning or is it all CSS?
>
> All CSS. D
I remember when Shadow of the Beast came out on the Amiga. Crappy
gameplay, but great parallax scrolling.
This is a great effect. Old Disney films used this well.
Looks like 4 layers there. Anyone look at the code yet? Is there
Javascript controlling the positioning or is it all CSS?
On Feb 18,
bout? :S
>
> On Feb 17, 5:26 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why has "dimensions" not been dragged into the core jQuery library? So
> > many plug-ins seem to want it that we end up with html files all over
> > the web that ask for dimensi
Why has "dimensions" not been dragged into the core jQuery library? So
many plug-ins seem to want it that we end up with html files all over
the web that ask for dimensions, slowing the loading of the page.
On Feb 17, 4:39 am, Nazgulled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Eric Martin
> I took your sugg
Nevermind about the PHP. It couldn't find my PHP.exe, which was in
WAMP5. Still think it's kind of lame that the jQuery support is for
jQuery1.1.
On Feb 14, 7:30 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried Komodo. Very nifty. I like how it checks JavaScript
>
I just tried Komodo. Very nifty. I like how it checks JavaScript
syntax and does word completion. The jQuery plugin that comes with it
is old. Is there a newer one? It also is missing a PHP plugin. Where
is the locations for those plugins it uses?
Is the Komodo IDE worth the money?
Still love PS
5 options (I even considered writing my own), but in the end I
> > chose the option that I thought was most likely to see future
> > development and support.
>
> > On Feb 13, 6:47 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I searched google for "j
One thing I've been wondering about animate. Can you create a function
for the path that something moves along?
On Feb 13, 10:44 am, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I don't usually announce to this list when I post something on
> learningjquery.com, but I figured it mi
I searched google for "jquery autocompletion" and was overwhelmed by
the choices. Looks like people have been borrowing heavily back and
forth to get the best solution.
Has anyone gone through the choices recently and selected one? If so,
which did you choose and why?
I'd like to use it for both
I tried a bunch and ended up with PSPad.
Besides the Metadata plugin, there's also a plugin called Collection
that looks interesting.
http://plugins.jquery.com/project/Collection
This is worth a little more discussion. You're saying that we can use
a div to hold variables, then jQuery can naturally deal with them.
That kinda blows my mind. I'm not sure it would be very speedy, but it
seems very flexible.
On Feb 9, 12:41 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
It's good practice to at least know where the danger areas might be in
the upcoming browsers. The more people who see these problems, the
better chance we have that something crucial (like detection that the
page is ready to mess with) doesn't cream a fair number of our
scripts.
I check my in-dev
Just what is a jQuery collection that we pass along into jQuery? I
feel like I'm missing something to be able to use jQuery for my own
data.
On Feb 9, 8:43 am, cbmtrx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks lihao.
>
> Actually, there are cases when there would be more than one "newdiv"
> following an
According to that test, array and join is almost 6 times as fast as
string concat in my browser (Firefox on Vista).
On Feb 6, 4:37 pm, J Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've heard a few people mention the building an array and then
> using .join(''). I found that good-old-fashioned string conc
(index, val){
> // index is 0...1...2, val is 'a'...'b'...'c'
>
> });
>
> On Jan 31, 3:40 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > $.each( [0,1,2,3,4], function(index, num) {
> > $("#port"+num).click(function
$.each( [0,1,2,3,4], function(index, num) {
$("#port"+num).click(function() { bigchart(num); });
});
Wait. What's the "index" in there for. I don't need that, do I? Seems
to work fine without it. I'll assume that was a leftover from a
previous idea.
I ended up using this. I liked it much better than my previous
solution (passing in "this" and then stripping the digit out in the
handler).
$.each( [0,1,2,3,4], function(index, num) {
$("#port"+num).click(function() { bigchart(num); });
});
This one is easy for me to read, comprehend, and m
Thanks for all the examples. I was able to find a couple ways on my
own, but I love to see how other people solve these problems so I can
learn new techniques.
Hardest thing for me when in JavaScript is taking my mind out of C and
PHP. Shared syntax is a blessing and a curse.
length-1) );
>
> });
>
> Something close to that should do it. Although if you end up with 10 or
> more clickables you'll have to change your naming scheme a bit.
>
> -- Josh
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "timothytoe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
I think I submitted a half-done version of this message by accident a
few minutes ago. Sorry.
This works:
$("#port0").click(function() {bigchart(0)});
$("#port1").click(function() {bigchart(1)});
$("#port2").click(function() {bigchart(2)});
$("#port3").click(function() {bigchart(3)});
$
This code works...
$("#port0").click(function() {bigchart(0)});
$("#port1").click(function() {bigchart(1)});
$("#port2").click(function() {bigchart(2)});
$("#port3").click(function() {bigchart(3)});
$("#port4").click(function() {bigchart(4)});
Naturally, I want to do this:
var por
On Jan 19, 6:39 pm, cjl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karl:
>
> Thanks again. One last bug in the code you posted above, in the $
> ('div.flag').each function, the assignment:
>
> var $this = $(this);
>
> Needs to take place before the if-else statements.
>
> Overall, you improved code runs in ap
If Firebug is new to you, you're about to fall in love.
Be sure to check out the various online tutorials.
On Jan 19, 5:03 pm, cjl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, TT, thank you, firebug is exactly what I was looking for!
>
> -CJL
Have you tried Firebug's profiler? That's what I use.
On Jan 19, 12:39 pm, cjl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to 'profile' the javascript as I try to optimize it,
> to find out where the slow bits are?
> -CJL
It's reasonably easy to get it down to a zipcode. But beyond that I
don't think it's possible. IPs are way too dynamic.
--tt
On Jan 17, 6:12 pm, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, research on this topic has just left me desperate.
>
> I need to find a commercial company that prov
I ended up upgrading my Vista computer to XP.
On Jan 17, 4:33 pm, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or an even better solution (if it works in your case) might be this
>
> approach rather than totally diabling the UAC:
>
> http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-acco
It would be cool if shift-mousewheel or alt-mousewheel did that. The
trick is you'd always have to tell the user how to do it.
The touchpad on my laptop allows horizontal scrolling if you drag left-
and-right along the bottom of the page, so it would be nice if jQuery
could pick that up. And my D
Beta testers: How stable is this? Should I switch from 1.2.1 yet?
On Jan 14, 8:23 pm, Up-Works <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://code.google.com/p/jqueryjs/downloads/detail?name=jquery-1.2.2
>>What problems are you having specifically? I know there is a subpixel
>>rendering problem.
I'm assuming the subpixel rendering is what is causing the ugly black
lines on the left and right side of the "border:1 display: inline"
example.
I'd probably use this if the IE problem gets fixed. Very
Somehow I missed you reply and started another similar thread today.
Sorry. I'm still getting used to Google Groups.
I have a JS app that does a lot of calculations. I'm having trouble
keeping the browser responsive. My current solution is to take apart
loops that last a long time and make them into functions that call
themselves with setTimeout(). (As far as I can tell, you HAVE to do
this to keep the browser f
I have an application that is very processor-intensive. It can takes
up to a minute to run. In order to keep the browser from bringing up a
dialog that asks the user if he or she wants to bail, I break the work
into chunks that are chained together with setTimout().
I'm having trouble getting smo
Chicks dig it.
On Jan 3, 4:17 pm, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ream Men" just have to know...
>
> How does developing in FF increase you "reproductivity" ?
>
> :o)
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
It's silly to rail against "standards." Yes, we still have to support
IE6. But IE8 is moving towards standards compliance and eventually
that's what we'll be writing for. We know how this game works. New
features show up in new browsers, but we can't use them for a few
years until the new browsers
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
