OK. Since I'm creating so much of the web site on the fly, there's
really no way of knowing whether I'm valid or not, is there? I mean
it's pretty easy to make my trivial, skeletal html (or php) file
valid--there's hardly anything in it!
I tried to go through all the paths and validate. I guess I'm OK if
all I get are warnings that complain about the validator seeing an
HTML version of the DOM rather than a XHTML version.
Oh, and <canvas> is not valid. Nothing to be done about that, right?
On Feb 23, 6:36 pm, "Karl Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not a problem.
>
> I assume you're viewing the DOM tree via Firebug (or something
> similar)? If so then what you're seeing is a representation of the
> tree that Firebug is generating.
>
> The concept of XHTML vs HTML (vs XML) is pretty much gone after the
> (X)HTML is parsed and turned into the DOM tree. There's no need for
> keeping around the quotes, '/>' or other "delimiters" as each of the
> elements now exists as a node, not as some textual representation.
>
> Karl Rudd
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:52 AM, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not sure this is 100% jQuery's problem.
>
> > I do this:
>
> > $("#logo").html("<img src='images/logosmall.gif' alt='logopic' />");
>
> > But what lands in the browser is this:
>
> > <div id="logo"><img src="images/logosmall.gif" alt="logopic"></div>
>
> > Interestingly, the single quotes have been converted to double quotes
> > and the trailing " /" has been lost, which kills my validation.
>
> > Is it jQuery being funny here or the browser itself? What should I do?
>
> > If it helps, my PHP file stats like this:
>
> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
> > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
> > <head>
> > <meta name="generator" content="HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 11
> > February 2007), seewww.w3.org" />
