Ariel,
Thanks! :)
Pax,
- Stan
On Jan 4, 10:29 am, Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Stosh
> Sure! actually, all the releases till this one, I uploaded as ZIP,
> I chose RAR this time because it was a few KB smaller, that's all.
> You can get th
Ariel,
Any chance we could get you to post the source in a format other than
rar? Perhaps zip or a tarball?
Pax,
- Stan
On Jan 3, 6:08 pm, Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There, now it shows an example of code when a link is clicked.
> I'd appreciate it, if some people could try it
Thanks Karl, I've done this - hopefully I can get some feedback and
see if they've already addressed a fix for this and if it is even
possible.
Pax.
On Nov 23, 10:11 am, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Stosh wrote:
>
> > P
Jörn,
filter() appears to behave the same way that find() does, looping
through and stacking the results in order, not by appearance in the
DOM.
Pax,
- Stan
On Nov 23, 3:05 am, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karl Swedberg schrieb:
>
> > Hi Stan,
>
> > this topic has come up once be
An observation I just noticed...
To do the following...
$(start).find('div.classOne, div.classTwo');
And have it order properly, with Karl's example it'd actually need to
be:
$(start).find('*').filter(function() {
return this.className.match(/classOne|classTwo/);
}) ;
I just noticed this
t using a filter function should give you the results in the
> order you want them. Something like this maybe?
>
> $('div').filter(function() {
> return this.className.match(/classOne|classTwo/);
>
> })
>
> That should give you the divs in the order they appe
Greetings,
I have a general inquiry for the core dev guys... I noticed today
while running a selector that comma separated selectors build their
results by order of the selector and not by order they appear within
the originating DOM. What I mean is, if I am running a selector that
has say two d
I haven't seen anyone post a patch for jCarousellite yet, so if anyone
is trying to get it to work with jQuery 1.2.0 the fixes are simple and
you can use the patch below. I've also posted the patch on the
author's blog. The issue seems to be limited (as best I can tell) to
lt() and gt() instead
Running it through lint also usually does the trick. This is what I
do with my js files, lint them, and then compress them with Dean's
work.
Pax,
- Stan
On Oct 3, 10:19 pm, "Jeffrey Kretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main things are the missing semicolons at the end of each command.
>
>
Glen,
Be careful ob_gzhandler() doesn't always work the way you would want/
expect it to. Reference the notes in the php.net docs to see what I'm
talking about. Bottom line, if you want to have gzip handling you're
best doing it at the apache level.
Pax,
- Stan
On Oct 2, 5:28 pm, "Glen Lipka"
Looking forward to your work John - from what I've seen thus far
you've got some excellent code waiting in the wings.
If I can make a request for tomorrow, after you recup and rejuvenate
from a hard day's work for the community...
I'd love to know/understand the relationship between UI & Interfa
Very nice work. I've enjoyed watching this project mature. Once
Safari support is added I'll be able to use it a little more
widespread, right my now too many of my users are running Safari to
make it practical. Keep up the good work, I look forward to following
your progress!
Pax.
On Sep 12
There's a ticket opened for this:
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/1579
But does anyone know the rationale here? Is there any chance we can
get this fixed in 1.2.1? I like the concept, but there needs to be
some way of disabling this functinality for the $.ajax() method to be
truly usable like it h
e:
> Doesn't $().text(); automatically do this?
>
> So:
>
> var text = $(html).text();
>
> Would solve your problem, I think.
>
> - jake
>
> On 9/14/07, Stosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In Prototype there is a method called stripTags(), it&#x
In Prototype there is a method called stripTags(), it's source looks
like:
stripTags: function() {
return this.replace(/<\/?[^>]+>/gi, '');
}
To do it the jQuery way, I might consider doing something like this...
jQuery.fn.stripTags = function() {
return this.replaceWith( this.html(
On Sep 11, 11:22 am, Pyrolupus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "All documentation has now been moved out of the jQuery internal code
> and onto the jQuery Documentation Wiki. We're currently working on new
> tools to convert the documentation into the old XML format (so that
> sites like Visual jQue
John,
Any chance that this might be integrated into the core in a future
version, or something like it perhaps?
Pax,
- Stan
On Aug 20, 1:23 am, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is absolutely clutch. I've been watching this plugin progress
> nicely and I'm very pleased with how it's
One other thing that's bothering me about the validate plugin...
first, for the record I want to clarify that I really do like this
plugin - I find it especially useful. I am unable to have a form
object and call validate() on it more then once. For the most part
this makes sense, but I have an
Dan,
Thanks for the response. The particular page I am working with is
used to take in registrations for a conference, a given individual
will login and register X number of participants for their group.
>From the primary screen they have the ability to add new registrations
or update existing on
What's the rationale behind the validate plugin only handling one
jQuery object? This doesn't seem consistent with how jQuery works at
all.
The website states:
Validating multiple forms on one page: The plugin can handle only one
form per call. In case you have multiple forms on a single page wh
On May 17, 4:11 pm, Andrea Ercolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just released http://notelog.com/category/chili/Chili 1.8 , which
> eventually gets a very requested feature: the mithical jQuery chainability.
> Improved speed and better examples are good news too.
Andrea,
Thanks for these g
much, though...
>
> Also, I think this will be very useful feature and it will be a good
> plug-in.
Emil,
Let me know if you decide to pursue a Queue plugin - I'd love to
help. If you don't I may try and tackle it in my spare time...
Pax,
- Stosh
thod is needed... then again, maybe it is. I know with some
server side stuff I've done it's come in handy at the most random
times.
FWIW, $0.02
- Stosh
On May 7, 5:05 pm, Emil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also Stosh, about the query plug-in idea - can you share what exactly
> you have in mind..
Emil,
For example Being able to stack AJAX calls into a queue, so that
they are either spaced out or simply don't occur
On May 7, 5:05 pm, Emil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also Stosh, about the query plug-in idea - can you share what exactly
> you have in mind..
Emil,
For example Being able to stack AJAX calls into a queue, so that
they are either spaced out or simply don't occur
fitable to expand this
idea a bit and develop a queue plugin for jQuery. I'm not sure what
it takes to get something into the core - and I understand keeping the
core small, but a queue system could come in handy.
- Stosh
26 matches
Mail list logo
