kamalcph commented on PR #18787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18787#issuecomment-2631717442
> > Unrelated to this change, but are we still using
> > ```
> > public int metadataPartition(TopicIdPartition topicIdPartition) {
> > return rlmTopicPartitioner.metad
kamalcph merged PR #18787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18787
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache
kamalcph commented on PR #18787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18787#issuecomment-2631610900
> Unrelated to this change, but are we still using
>
> ```
> public int metadataPartition(TopicIdPartition topicIdPartition) {
> return rlmTopicPartitioner.metadat
kamalcph opened a new pull request, #18787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18787
The statement gets logged in the INFO level and gets printed for every
message produced to the __remote_log_metadata topic. Removed the log statement
as it is needed only during debug session. And, w
