TestRunner remarks

e. I did not choose isApplicationIdentity, since this could be confused with isApplicationIdentitySupported which returns true if the iut supports application identity. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech

Another api20 change

Hi, attached you find some changes of the api20 project. It adds method isDetached to the StateManager interface and add since tags to two PM methods. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http

Re: Another api20 change

calling PersistenceCapable instance * @return the object representing the version of the calling instance. */ Object getVersion (PersistenceCapable pc); What do you think? Regards Michael Hi Michael, Looks good to check in. Craig On Jun 26, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Michael Bouschen

Re: Another api20 change

I did of course mean to say "the jdoIsDetached() method". -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Another api20 change

pec should state that it is for the implementation to decide whether to use them whilst detached. I don't see this currently. -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33

Re: 4 non transactional read errors

++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/ --- Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Fwd: Changes for review

Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235

Re: Fix for JDO-77

--- Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/

Re: Trying to run one tck test

[java] [DEBUG] tck - Failures comparing oids. Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]h

Re: Fix for JDO-77

Hi Craig, this looks good, no remarks from my side. Regards Michael Hi Michael, On Jul 2, 2005, at 11:58 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, the changes look good! I would like to propose a few improvements of the method mangleObject you changed. Maybe this should be an extra check in

Re: Changes for review

ing "{0}". \ +\nThe parameter String is of the form ":". +EXC_CreateKeyAsObjectMustNotBeCalled: The method createKeyAsObject must not be called \ +because the keyAsObject field must never be null for this class. ---

Re: Please review these changes to JDOHelper

BadPMFNonStaticGetPMFMethod(); +} +} + +private static class BadPMFWrongReturnType { +public static BadPMFWrongReturnType +getPersistenceManagerFactory(Map props) { +return new BadPMFWrongReturnType(); +} +} } - ---

Enhancer20 changes for review

argument (instead of String). - Commented out exception thrown by XML parser when detecting unknown attribute. Please note, the above method are not yet implemented. The enhancer generated method bodies throw an UnsupportedOperationException. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen

Re: API20 changes

requires JDOPermission("getMetadata")? - Bundle.properties Please add a newline at the end of the file. Regards Michael Hi, This is still a work in progress, pending inclusion of the JDONullIdentityFIeldException. But the ObjectIdentity class is mostly done. Craig -- Michae

Re: VOTE: Change handling of null primary key during makePersistent of SingleFieldIdentity classes

. [ ] approve [ ] disapprove. Why? Thanks, Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: VOTE: Add ObjectIdentity to single field identity classes

://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49

Re: svn commit: r209692 - in /incubator/jdo/trunk/api20: src/java/javax/jdo/ src/java/javax/jdo/identity/ src/java/javax/jdo/spi/ test/java/javax/jdo/identity/

3.construct(JDOImplHelper.java:580) at javax.jdo.spi.JDOImplHelper.construct(JDOImplHelper.java:610) at javax.jdo.identity.ObjectIdentity.(ObjectIdentity.java:86) at javax.jdo.identity.ObjectIdentityTest.testStringDateConstructor(ObjectIdentityTest.java:202) HTH -- Michael Bouschen

Re: svn commit: r209692 - in /incubator/jdo/trunk/api20: src/java/javax/jdo/ src/java/javax/jdo/identity/ src/java/javax/jdo/spi/ test/java/javax/jdo/identity/

tem http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 F

Re: Patch for date issue

tem http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Notes on today's checkins

n.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 20

Re: JDOHelper patch

to JDOHelperTest. Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen

Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3

adJDOConfig(GeneratorBase.java:1307) at org.jpox.enhancer.JPOXEnhancer.main(JPOXEnhancer.java:249) Exception in thread "main" Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Patch for review: add method to return the root list to CompanyModelReader

. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin Index: test/java/org

Problem with self-referencing relationship

OIN is the same as the one in the FROM clause, so I think it needs an identification variable. I filed a JIRA issue JDO-93 with more details (configuration and stacktrace) for this. Thanks! Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: Antlr 2.7.5

of problems. Michael Bouschen is the expert who can tell us whether and how we can use the latest release. Craig -Brian Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael

Re: Inheritance proposal

ATE TABLE project_member ( PROJID INTEGER REFERENCES projects NOT NULL, MEMBER INTEGER REFERENCES persons NOT NULL ); CREATE TABLE employee_phoneno_type ( EMPID INTEGER REFERENCES persons NOT NULL, PHONENO VARCHAR(16) NOT NULL, TYPE VARCHAR(16) NOT NULL ); ALTER TABLE

Running a single test in fostore20 (was Re: Problem with self-referencing relationship)

Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Inheritance proposal

d a row in table TB. (2) In table TB. No element is needed since TB includes columns for the inherited fields. So TA only has rows for class A instances, not for B instances. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ht

Re: Inheritance proposal

row in TA only. The only difference we see from option 1 is where the user decides to override the specifications for a field of A, in class B e.g which would mean that table TB will carry the value for that field (rather than the column in table TA). -- Michael Bouschen

Re: Antlr 2.7.5

? We coul djust go to 2.7.5 which is in the repo... We added international character support in a non-standard way in 2.7.0 and have had to carry it forward through a few releases. Each release had its own set of problems. Michael Bouschen is the expert who can tell us whether and how we can

Patch for review: remove the text JDORI from error messages in *20 projects

Hi Craig, some Bundle.properties files in core20, runtime20, query20 and fostore20 define error messages that still use the phrase "JDO Reference Implementation (jdo.jar and jdo-ri.jar)". I changed the error messages. Please find a patch file for review attached. Regards Michael

Re: Does JPOX support PK fields of type java.sql.Date?

lds of type java.util.Date are persistent by default. The field is marked as primary-key field and the persistence-modifier of a primary-key field defaults to persistent. So we thought there is no need to add persistence-modifier="persistent" to the field metadata, when changin

Re: Please review this patch for JDOImplHelper

ED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Problem with self-referencing relationship

sue JDO-93. Regards Mchael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Does JPOX support PK fields of type java.sql.Date?

cer log? Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Does JPOX support PK fields of type java.sql.Date?

-d option when the enhancer is called for applicationidentity. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012

Patch for review: fix for JDO-81

field identity. Attached you find a patch. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: JIRA JDO-115

Hi Andy, done. Regards Michael Hi Michelle, your fix for SimpleInterface is confirmed. Can someone with the necessary JIRA privileges please close this issue (since I can't ...). -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: errors while running tck20 tests

SPATH! [java] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time: 0.552 seconds. [java] Excluded tests: [org.apache.jdo.tck.enhancement.FieldAccessModified, org.apache.jdo.tck.enhancement.ImplementsPersistenceCapable] [java] [ERROR] Java Result: 1 -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: JDO-109

pool.CannotAcquireResourceException: A ResourcePool could not acquire a resource from its primary factory or source. [java] at com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool.awaitAcquire( BasicResourcePool.java:970) [java] at com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool.checkoutResource( BasicRe

Re: TCK logging proposal

l components is "INFO". Sounds good. Regads Michael > > Regards, > Michael > -- > ------- > Michael Watzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Buelowstr. 6

Re: Patch implementing logging proposal

dir="${jdo.tck.enhanced.dir}/${jdo.tck.identitytype}" classname="${iut.enhancer.main}" classpathref="this.enhance.class.path"> + + +

Re: Cleaning up the datastore in tearDown

27;m thinking of the issue with CompletenessTest not cleaning up because of issues with loading the instances). Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen

Re: 2nd patch implementing logging proposal

--- > Michael Watzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Buelowstr. 66 > Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany > Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/ > ---

Re: 2nd patch implementing logging proposal

ationships.txt: Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time: 10,469 seconds. derby-app-companyAllRelationships.txt: Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time: 10,985 seconds. derby-dsid-alltests.txt: Tests run: 396, Failures: 16, Errors: 24, Time: 253,422 seconds. derby-dsid-compa

Re: 2nd patch implementing logging proposal

--- Michael Watzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Buelowstr. 66 Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/

Re: Bug in XML testdata

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Buelowstr. 66 > Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany > Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/ > --- > -- Mic

Re: Bug in XML testdata

r to run "maven rebuild" each time you get a new jpox build. I suppose that in maven.xml we could put a dependency of the enhanced classes on the jpox enhancer in the uptodate test, but it seems a bit unorthodox. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michael, thanks for the p

Re: Completeness test and Company model

checked the metadata and now I'll take a look at the jpox log. Might be something interesting there. And I'll file a JIRA issue. Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O,

Re: Completeness test and Company model

Hi Craig, I checked in the changes. Regards Michael Hi Michael, On Aug 29, 2005, at 8:03 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, the changes look good, just two comments: - Do we still need the interfaces in the icompany package? With revision 263928 you added pc interfaces (such as

Re: Patch for new tests of schema orm attribute

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Property changes on: test/orm/applicationide

Re: Patch for new tests of schema orm attribute

Hi Michelle, I installed cygwin on my windows which is a "Linux-like environment for Windows". It comes with a chmod command. What do you think about the overwrite question from below: is this a problem? Regards Michael Hi Michael, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, t

Upgrade derby version in tck20

and derby. Attached you find a patch for review changing the README, tck20/project.xml and tck20/project.properties. Running the tck with derby 10.1.1.0 results in the same number of errors and failures. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto

Re: Patch for new tests of schema orm attribute

Hi Michelle, Hi Michael, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, I installed cygwin on my windows which is a "Linux-like environment for Windows". It comes with a chmod command. Okay, I have cygwin. So there is no preventative solution for this problem, just a cure? Not that

Re: Patch for new tests of schema orm attribute

oticed that the proposal uses the same mappings ids as the inheritance proposal. This concerns the SQL file names also. I just want to make sure that there is no overlap between the proposals. So, let me know which proposal we will adapt. Regards, Michael -- Michael Bouschen[

Re: Upgrade derby version in tck20

Michael, +1. Craig On Aug 30, 2005, at 4:41 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, derby recently released version 10.1.1.0 and graduated from apache incubator. So how about upgrading the derby version in tck20? The major reason is that the new derby version is available from ibiblio, so it will be

Re: 2nd version of inheritance patch 1 of 2

only me and Erik working on JPOX core/enhancer in our spare time, we have enough to be working on right now ;-) -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

sell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33

Re: Persistent interface factory testing proposal

trategy for persistent interface factory pm.newInstance(PersistentInterfact.class). Thanks, Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL P

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

utton at the end of the window and followed the dialog. I hope this helps. Regards Michael [...] -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: TCK Schema : M-N relations

E_IDENTITY); + ALTER TABLE departments ADD CONSTRAINT EMP_MO_FK FOREIGN KEY (EMP_OF_THE_MONTH) REFERENCES persons(DATASTORE_IDENTITY); -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/

Re: TCK Schema : M-N relations

the REFERENCES clause from its definition: CREATE TABLE project_member ( PROJID INTEGER NOT NULL, MEMBER INTEGER NOT NULL ); What do you think? Regards Michael Craig On Sep 4, 2005, at 2:55 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Andy, thanks for the patch! I think the changes also apply to the

Re: TCK Schema : M-N relations

nges later. On Sep 4, 2005, at 3:18 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, Hi Michael, I believe that the patch applies to the other datastoreidentityschemafiles as well. Yes, this is what I think, too. I will check in the change for all datastoreidentity schema files unless I hear any

Re: TCK Schema : M-N relations

latter form already, but not all of them. Regards Michael Hi Michael, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, Hi Michael, I believe that the patch applies to the other datastoreidentityschemafiles as well. Yes, this is what I think, too. I will check in the change for all datastoreidentity

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Logging - cleaning up older log folders

log files, any older ones should be cleaned up. I think that the RollingFileAppender in Log4j is an option where it would create backups of existing log files, but i can still tell log4j to maintain x number of backups. -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mai

Re: Testing persistent interfaces

tp://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49

Re: Testing persistent interfaces

eview. On Sep 5, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, I like the idea of using the xml bean factory instance pattern instead of the static bean factory. I was not aware that I can add a bean instance to the CompanyModelReader using an API su

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

to do with subversion, because the property svn:executable is not set for all these files. Instead it might have to do with how windows sets file permissions for file created during the svn checkout. Do you have any idea? Regards Michael -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, some more remarks

Re: Bug in latest SVN "test/conf/configurations.list"

/configurations.list" Currently says "schemaAttributeORM.conf" Should be "schemaAttributeOrm.conf" Can someone fix this please -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/

New subpackages for TCK query tests

Query instance - delete testing delete queries Some of the existing test cases need to be refactored into the api package. Should we keep the remaining tests in org.apache.jdo.tck.query or should we add another package (e.g. language) for these? Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

rmation on how to change Windows file permissions in the last paragraph of the subversion wiki page. You check a box so that the default permissions get propogated to all child directories of the directory whose permissions you modify. I see, thanks! Regards Michael -- Michelle Michael Bous

Re: javadoc

Hi Michelle, please try maven javadoc. It generates the javadoc under target/docs/apidocs and some report files under target/javadoc. Regards Michael > Hi, > > How do I generate javadoc for api20? > > -- Michelle > -- Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering

Re: javadoc

Hi Michelle, Thanks, everyone. Should we add to the build goal in api20 and api11? Yes, I think this makes sense for the api11 and api20. Regards Michael -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, please try maven javadoc. It generates the javadoc under target/docs/apidocs and

Re: Connection Pooling

ichael Watzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Buelowstr. 66 Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/ --- -- Michael Bouschen

Re: Please review this patch for PersistenceCapable, FetchPlan, JDOImplHelper

ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: New subpackages for TCK query tests

Hi Craig, Hi Michael, On Sep 7, 2005, at 6:38 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, Michael W. and I started looking into JDO assertions testing JDO query features that have been added with JDO2. None of them are implemented yet, so we will have to add a couple of new query test classes. It

New query assertions

ed in APIs setResult, setResultClass, setFilter, declareVariables, declareParamters, declareImports, setGrouping, setOrdering, and setRange override the corresponding settings from the single string query. What do you think? Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: New query assertions

Hi Michelle, thanks! Regards Michael Hi Michael, Sounds good. I've added this assertion to the working draft of the spec and the spreadsheet. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, I think we need a new assertion in the query chapter. It is about overriding elements

Re: Typo in spec?

ow: OrderingClause: OrderingSpecifications ,opt OrderingSpecs: OrderingSpec OrderingSpecs , OrderingSpec OrderingSpec: Expression Ascending Expression Descending Regards, Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.sp

Re: JDO-131 patches for review

ect.properties (working copy) @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ maven.junit.dir = ${jdo.tck.testdir} maven.junit.sysproperties = PMFProperties PMFProperties = jdori.properties - +# Setting this property to false will turn off cleanup of data from database to inspect database contents after test run +cleanup.da

Re: JDO-131 patches for review

sysproperty, too. Good catch! Regards Michael Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Karan Singh, nice work! I would like to propose three small changes: - All tck property names start with jdo.tck, so how about renaming cleanup.data to jdo.tck.cleanupdata? - I propose to specify a default (true) for the

Re: error while sending attachments

t another email saying that i cannot send .zip files. So i have jarred it up. -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012

Re: error while sending attachments

this would overload the diagram. If we think there should be an UML diagram for the interfaces and the factories, we should add a new one. Regards Michael On 9/12/05, Michael Bouschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Karan Singh, AFAIK you cannot send jar files either to the mailin

Re: JDO-131 patches for review

s a little long :-)). Regards Michael Craig On Sep 11, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Karan Singh, Hi Michael, Do you think we would need the same property for the iut tests? The patch which i submitted earlier does not add the sysproperty for iut tests in maven.xml. yes, I th

dtd and xsd files in api20

only have query and extension subelements. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783

Re: dtd and xsd files in api20

Hi Craig, thanks! I can forward the .jdoquery question to the JDO expert group. Regards Michael Hi Michael, On Sep 12, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, today the api20 project includes jdo.dtd, jdo.xsd, orm.dtd defining the structure of metadata files.Should we add an

Re: JDO-131 patches for review

operty should indicate that it's cleaning up "after" the test, something like: jdo.tck.cleanupafter or jdo.tck.cleanupaftertest Craig On Sep 11, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Karan Singh, Hi Michael, Do you think we would need the same property for the iut test

Re: Please review this patch for PersistenceCapable, FetchPlan, JDOImplHelper

the object id * @param pcClass the PersistenceCapable class. Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -

Re: JDO-131 patch (updated)

do.tck.cleanupaftertest", "true").equalsIgnoreCase("true"); + /** The Properties object for the PersistenceManagerFactory. */ protected static Properties PMFPropertiesObject; @@ -260,7 +267,9 @@ pmf = null; try { -

Re: JDO-131 patch (updated)

issue, I have added the comment to JDO-131 that it is FIXED. On 9/13/05, Michael Bouschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelows

Re: JDO-135

://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30

Re: status update: ri11 enhancer support for jdk 1.5

m.sun.jndi.fsconte xt.RefFSContextFactory] This sun-specific JDK class seems to be missing or renamed in JDK 1.5. I guess we only have to change the entry in ri11/test/conf/jndi.properties. If anyone knows, let me know. ----------

Patch for review: changes in top level maven.xml

the jars of dependend projects are not available. I found a solution in the mail archive of the 'Maven User List'. It redefines the goal multiproject:clean. I copied the solution in the maven.xml in trunk and it works perfect. You find it in the attached patch file. Regards Michael

Re: Latest version of spec with assertions?

g SOA easy with agile business intermediation software that combines heterogeneous data with services to easily develop and deploy transactional composite applications. Enterprises can quickly respond to changing business requirements and dramatically reduce the costs of data access and service int

JIRA and svn commit

k.java") was passed as a parameter. Any idea? Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: My first test run -- 'splain me this, Lucy

PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Karan Malhi -- Karan Malhi -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: JDO2 §12.7.2: fetch-depth only for "recursive fetch group references"?

n accordance with the spec. It would be nice if you (Craig?) could clarify whether fetch-depth really should be limited to recursive fields only. If I'm not mistaken entirely, that means generic replication using detach/attach is made unusable in many cases unless e.g. you maintain your

Patrch for review (was: [Fwd: [jira] Updated: (JDO-92) Remove support for GUI test runner])

Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin --- Begin Message --- [ http

Re: PM/PMF detachAllOnCommit broken in runtime20 ?

llOnCommit/setDetachAllOnCommit methods -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >