Hi Craig,
thanks! I can forward the .jdoquery question to the JDO expert group.
Regards Michael
Hi Michael,
On Sep 12, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Craig,
today the api20 project includes jdo.dtd, jdo.xsd, orm.dtd defining
the structure of metadata files.Should we add an orm.xsd?
Yes, the omission was an oversight on my part.
The spec allows JDOQL queries to be defined in .jdoquery metadata
files. Their structure uses a subset of the metadata elements of the
.jdo and .orm files. Would it make sense to add a separate dtd for
.jdoquery files: jdoquery.dtd (and a .jdoquery.xsd)? I think it
defines just a few elements: a new root element jdoquery, package,
class, interface and query. Elements package, class and interface
only define the name attribute; class and interface only have query
and extension subelements.
Yes. I'll need to run this past the expert group. But I agree with the
concept.
Thanks,
Craig
Regards Michael
--
Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
--
Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
