Hello everyone,
Whenever I search a word in my web application, I search in some default
fields,
e.g. I search the word "hello", I generate these queries :
title:hello
headlines:hello
summary:hello
content:hello
Which I add in a BooleanQuery (BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD)
What I want to achieve
ePolicy.html#findMerges%28org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos%29>
Would somebody be so kind to explain it to me?
Thanks, thanks a lot
Thomas
ombination of native XML stores and Lucene?
Are there any problems that could arise from this combination?
- Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanx a lot Patrick! That's exactly what I was hoping for. I'll give it
a shot.
-Thomas
Patrick Turcotte wrote:
Hi,
There is a Lucene-eXist trigger that allows you to do just that. Take
a look at patch
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1654205&g
Similarity.
Lucene has been developed and grown and I was wondering if you can now
do the same thing in a simpler and more straigth forward way.
Maybe with some of the newer SpanQuerys or a other use of payloads.
Does anyone have any idea where to start?
Regards Thomas
And to include the code
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> I forgot to add that this is with today's build of trunk.
>
> -Original message-
>> From:Markus Jelsma
>> Sent: Thu 04-Oct-2012 15:42
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Highlighter IOOBE with modif
Hello,
I have some custom queries & scorer that need to able to construct the
"global" docIds (doc + docBase).
But when i use these in a QueryWrapperFilter they no longer work,
because QueryWrapperFilter.getDocIdSet uses a "private context"
(context.reader().getContext();) which always has a docB
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a known problem currently. I think there is already an issue open, so
> this was not solved for 4.0 (I don't have the issue no available at the
> moment).
>
> My plan to fix this is to make Filters behave like queries (with
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a known problem currently. I think there is already an issue open, so
> this was not solved for 4.0 (I don't have the issue no available at the
> moment).
>
> My plan to fix this is to make Filters behave like queries (with
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Thomas Matthijs wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a known problem currently. I think there is already an issue open,
>> so this was not solved for 4.0 (I don't have the issu
Hey,
I have a question about "MoreLikeThis" in Lucene, Java. I built up an index and
want to find similar documents. But I always get no results for my query,
mlt.like(1) is always empty. Can anyone find my mistake? Here is an example. (I
use Lucene 4.0)
public class HelloLucene {
public
I've built a search prototype feature for my application using Lucene, and it
works great. The application monitors a remote system and currently indexes
just a few core attributes of the objects on that system. I get notifications
when objects change, and I then update the Lucene index to kee
estion
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Becker, Thomas wrote:
> I've built a search prototype feature for my application using Lucene, and it
> works great. The application monitors a remote system and currently indexes
> just a few core attributes of the object
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> On 20/02/2013 11:28, Paul Taylor wrote:
>
>> Just updating codebase from Lucene 3.6 to Lucene 4.1 and seems my tests
>> that use NormalizeCharMap for replacing characters in the anyalzers are not
>> working.
>>
>> bump, anybody I thought a s
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Matthijs wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>
>> On 20/02/2013 11:28, Paul Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> Just updating codebase from Lucene 3.6 to Lucene 4.1 and seems my tests
>>> that use Norma
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Thomas Matthijs wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Matthijs wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/02/2013 11:28, Paul Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just upd
We are doing some crash resiliency testing of our application. One of the
things we found is that the Lucene index seems to get out of sync with the
database pretty easily. I suspect this is because we are using near real time
readers and never actually calling IndexWriter.commit(). I'm tryin
ginal Message-
From: Becker, Thomas [mailto:thomas.bec...@netapp.com]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 1:33 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Detecting when an index was not closed properly
We are doing some crash resiliency testing of our application. One of the
things we found is tha
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Ashish Sarna wrote:
> I want to take back-up of a Lucene index. I need to ensure that index files
> would not change when I take their backup.
>
>
> I am concerned about the housekeeping/merge/optimization activities which
> Lucene performs internally. I am not
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Konstantyn Smirnov wrote:
> I want to refresh the topic a bit.
>
> Using the Lucene 4.3.0, I could'n find a method like expungeDeletes() in
> the
> IW anymore.
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/core/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.html#forceMergeDeletes()
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> The simple answer (that somehow nobody gave) is that you can make a copy
> of an index directory at any time. Indexes are changed in "generations".
> The segment* files describe the current generation of files. All active
> indexing goes on i
I'm relatively new to Lucene and am in the process of upgrading from 4.0 to
4.3.1. I'm trying to figure out if I need to leave my version at LUCENE_40 or
if it is safe to change it to LUCENE_43. Does this parameter directly
determine the index format? I have some existing indexes from 4.0 but
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:25 AM, VIGNESH S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried indexing in Desktop..It works fine.
> The above error loading error comes only in android..
> Any comments..
Don't strip META-INF/services files out of the jars
Sounds like you need a PhraseQuery.
-Original Message-
From: madan mp [mailto:madan20...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 7:40 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: query on exact match in lucene
how to get exact string match
ex- i am searching for file which consist of s
One of our main use-cases for search is to find objects based on partial name
matches. I've implemented this using n-grams and it works pretty well.
However we're currently using trigrams and that causes an interesting problem
when searching for things like "abc ab" since we first split on whi
dataset you
might consider allowing leading wildcards so that you could easily find all
words, for example, containing abc with *abc*. If your dataset is larger, you
might consider something like ReversedWildcardFilterFactory (Solr) to speed
this type of matching.
I look forward to other opinion
.almost.
Y. You're right. FuzzyQuery is not at all what you want.
Don't know if your data is actually as simple as this example. Do you need to
tokenize on whitespace? Would it make sense to replace spaces in the query
with underscores and then trigramify the whole query as i
ad the entire string. If the string is broken on _
already, then NGramFilter already receives the individual terms and you can put
a Filter in front that will pass through a padded token?
Shai
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Becker, Thomas wrote:
> In general the data for this field is tha
other implications, of course, but you get the
idea
There are a zillion possibilities here in terms of combining various
filterFactories
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Becker, Thomas
wrote:
> Sorry, at indexing time it's not broken on anything. In other words
> qu
s not automatically if i close searcher.close()?
Do I have to close something else, than all IndexSearchers and Directorys?
Or am I wrong with my assumption, and the problem is somewhere else?
Best
Thomas
-
To unsubscri
understand this page and help to get it in shape.
Best regards,
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
Hello All,
Can someone explain to me how fielded queries work with phrases? My
first thought is that the phrase is broken down into terms and those
terms are then fielded and separated with the AND operator. An
example would be the following:
name:"Tom Jones" --> name:"Tom" AND name:"Jones"
I
Hello Guys,
I trying to understand how lucene score is calculated. So 'm using the
searcher.explain() function. But the output it gives is really confusing for
me. Below are the details of the query that I gave and o/p it gave me
Query: *It is definitely a CES deal that will be over in Sep or Oct
m frequency, idf and field norm
>
> 0.07028562 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(payload:ces in 550), product of:
>
> 1.0 = *tf(*termFreq(payload:ces)=1)
>
> 2.2491398 = *idf(*docFreq=157, maxDocs=551)
>
> 0.03125 = *fieldNorm*(field=payload, doc=550)
>
>
Hi,
I was indexing some documents, but my program crashed after several days
of work. If I reopen this index it is empty. I guess the reason is that
auto-commit was not set and I never performed a commit. (Lesson
learned) So probably all documents are marked as "deleted" and
re-opening the i
amount of the deleted file handles will be
stable - but first at a amount of 500 or so.
Thanks in advance
Thomas
I integrated your
SearchManager class into our code, but I am still seeing file handles marked
deleted in the index directory. I am running the following command on Linux:
sudo watch
used" by the indexwriter) grows.
Is that possible and if yes why does the indexwriter do it? Is there a
max Value of deleted handles an IndexWriter could own, because I don't
want to chrash the system because of too much open filehandles?
Thanks in advance.
Thomas
--
help.
Thomas
I've found a case, only with compound file, where IndexWriter holds
open a SegmentReader on the pre-compound-file files... I'm working on
a test case& fix.
Mike
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Thomas Rewig wrote:
Hello,
I use the searcherManager for LiveIndexin
.0.2 Release version or have I wait for a future release?
Thanks for your help.
Thomas
Listen
Read phonetically
t the NumericRangeQuery query does not work?
I use lucene v. 3.0.2.
Thanks in advance!
Thomas
s all names of the second id-space and the first
id-space is used for the querrys.
String[] suggestions = spellchecker.suggestSimilar("john w.", 5);
But is there a better approach?
Can someone point me in the right direction for a effective approach?
Thanks in
I would expect if I do a
'exact matching' Term Query.
Each index was indexed with its associated LuceneVersion.
I tested it with luke and with my own Code - the result was always the
same.
Is it a new feature in Lucene 3.3.0 or a b
Doc.Id=227606 id=716893 name=aim
Is there a way to guarantee the inner sorting of same scores? Or how can
I avoid that documente with special characters have the same score as
documente of exact matches?
Thanks in advance!
Thomas
Am 18.07.2011 10:08, schrieb Ian Lea:
I'm not su
re=12,2324 Doc.Id=8060id=709579name=aim溝脇しほみ
1Score=12,2324 Doc.Id=227606id=716893name=aim
To avoid these problems right from the start, I need to use a different
analyser for indexing? (So that the docs 'aim溝脇しほみ' and 'aim' have
different scores)
Thank
List,
I am indexing a subset of Wikipedia. I have 4 years worth of data, and
have taken snapshots of each document at each month in the 4 year
span. Thus, I have 4*12=36 versions of each document. (I keep track of
the timestamp in a field.) I have noticed that in many cases, a
Wikipedia document d
List,
I am trying to incorporate the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic
model into Lucene. Briefly, the LDA model extracts topics
(distribution over words) from a set of documents, and then represents
each document with topic vectors. For example, documents could be
represented as:
d1 = (0,
ote about this sometime back...maybe this would help you.
> http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2011/01/payloads-with-solr.html
>
> -sujit
>
> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 12:29 -0500, Stephen Thomas wrote:
>> List,
>>
>> I am trying to incorporate the Latent Dirichlet Allocation
List,
I have written my own CustomAnalyzer, as follows:
public TokenStream tokenStream(String fieldName, Reader reader) {
// TODO: add calls to RemovePuncation, and SplitIdentifiers here
// First, convert to lower case
TokenStream
>> -Original Message-
>> From: stephen.warner.tho...@gmail.com
>> [mailto:stephen.warner.tho...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Thomas
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 5:20 PM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Custom Filter for Splitting CamelCase?
Kkkutterujjjbbb hgggja
Den 17/09/2013 12.55 skrev "David Miranda" :
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to do a kind of 'facet search', that initial research in a field of
> all documents in the Lucene index, and second search in other field of the
> documents returned to the first research.
>
> Currently I'm do th
.run(Thread.java:695)
I don't think thats an expected behavior and it is a bug in
org.apache.lucene.search.TopScoreDocCollector. Am I wrong?
Regards
- Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
Hi,
I couldn't reproduce the problem in the following test case, so let's drop this.
Regards
- Thomas
--
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.*;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.*;
import org.apache.lucene.document.*;
import org.apache.lucene.index
; when we search for
"Doe*"
Thank you.
Thomas W. Johnson, Senior Programmer
678-397-1663
tjohn...@paperhost.com<mailto:tjohn...@paperhost.com>
[PaperHost]
[asdf]<http://bit.ly/PaperHost_Twitter>
Follow PaperHost on T
Hello,
Just wondering if anyone has patched lucene 4.x for usage with java 17+ and
willing to share their work? anything would be appreciated.
No we cannot upgrade lucene, and will likely spend time to try to
backport/patch it ourselves, but maybe someone already has? if anyone has
interest in
350
damage unrepaired 30
metallic 60
something like this...
is there a way to do the same with lucene?
thx thomas.
--
GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry Passion!
http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/free/puzzle/6169196
Dear all,
I'd like my lucene searches to be insensitive to (French) accents. For example,
considering a indexed term "métal", I want to get it when searching for "metal"
or "métal" . I use lucene-2.3.2 and the searches are performed with:
IndexSearcher.search(query,filter,sorter), Another filte
] b[2] c[1].
The old discussion had no real solution but it is also a bit outdated,
maybe someone has a better idea now.
Greets, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
Hi,
I have a problem using TermQuery and FuzzyQuery for terms containing the
character "-". Considering I've indexed "jack" and "jack-bauer" as 2 tokenized
captions, I get no result when searching for "jack-bauer". Moreover, "jack"
with a TermQuery returns the two captions.
What should I do t
d strongly recommend you get a copy of Luke, it's invaluable for questions
like this
because it lets you look at what's actually in your index. It'll also show
you how
queries get broken down when pushed through various analyzers...
BTW, nice test case for demonstrating what you w
/www.windowslive.com/Online/Hotmail/Campaign/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM
>>>> _WL_QA_HM_sports_photos_072009&cat=sports
>>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-u
mpDir);
with
IndexSearcher indexSearcherTmp = new IndexSearcher(tmpDir, true);
No errors in the logfiles, no catched exceptions, etc. I'm a kinda out of ideas
at the moment. I googled and tried couple of things
(IndexWriter.setUseCompoundFile(true), etc.) but didn't find a
solution. A
y took {} ms", durationMillis);
}
return docs;
}
I'm wondering why others are experiencing better performance with 2.9 and why
our implementations performance is going bad. Maybe our way of using the 2.9 api
is not the best and sorting is definetly
Missed the attachment, sorry.
Thomas Becker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm experiencing a performance degradation after migrating to 2.9 and running
> some tests. I'm getting out of ideas and any help to identify the reasons why
> 2.9 is slower than 2.4 are highly appreci
Urm and uploaded here:
http://ankeschwarzer.de/tmp/graph.jpg
Sorry.
Thomas Becker wrote:
> Missed the attachment, sorry.
>
> Thomas Becker wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm experiencing a performance degradation after migrating to 2.9 and running
>> some tests.
nerCache is a Map containing field + parser
* (contracttocontentgroup prefix) as the key and as a value yet another map.
* The latter map finally contains the docIds as key and positionvalue for this
* prefix as value.
*
* @author Thomas Becker (thomas.bec...@net-m.de)
*
*/
pub
with lucene 2.4. I will now try a freshly build 2.9 index and see if performance
improves. Maybe that already solves the issue...stupid me...
We're updating the index every 30 min. at the moment and it gets optimized after
each update.
Mark Miller wrote:
> Thomas Becker wrote:
>> Hey Mar
ry as well?! Will check that.
Thanks a lot for your support!
Cheers,
Thomas
Mark Miller wrote:
> A few quick notes -
>
> Lucene 2.9 old api doesn't appear much worse than Lucene 2.4?
>
> You save a lot with the new Intern impl, because thats not a hotspot
> anymore. But t
org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753
>
--
Thomas Becker
Senior JEE Developer
net mobile AG
Zollhof 17
40221 Düsseldorf
GERMANY
Phone:+49 211 97020-195
Fax: +49 211 97020-949
Mobile: +49 173 5146567 (private)
E-Mail: mailto:thomas.bec...@net-m.de
Internet: http://www.net-m.de
Registergericht: Amts
Mark Miller wrote:
> Thomas Becker wrote:
>> Hey Mark,
>>
>> yes. I'm running the app on unix. You see the difference between 2.9 and 2.4
>> here:
>>
>> http://ankeschwarzer.de/tmp/graph.jpg
>>
> Right - I know your measurements showed
Hi Uwe,
already done. See my last message.
Cheers,
Thomas
Uwe Schindler wrote:
> On 2.9. NIOFS is only used, if you use FSDirectory.open() instead of
> FSDirectory.getDirectory (Deprecated). Can you compare when you use instead
> of FSDirectory.open() the direct ctor of SimpleFSDir vs.
e fields...
I'm using lucene 2.4.1 and java version "1.6.0_16".
Do anyone have an idea to avoid the growing memory. Or do somebody know
an other approche for a "realtime Item based Recommender" with Lucene?
Regards
Thomas
--
gt; https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753
>
--
Thomas Becker
Senior JEE Developer
net mobile AG
Zollhof 17
40221 Düsseldorf
GERMANY
Phone:+49 211 97020-195
Fax: +49 211 97020-949
Mobile: +49 173 5146567 (private)
E-Mail: mailto:thomas.bec...@net-m.de
Internet: http:/
g, can you fill us
> in on the query types you are using as well? (eg qualities)
>
> And grab invocations if its possible.
>
--
Thomas Becker
Senior JEE Developer
net mobile AG
Zollhof 17
40221 Düsseldorf
GERMANY
Phone:+49 211 97020-195
Fax: +49 211 97020-949
ry types you are using as well? (eg qualities)
>>
>> And grab invocations if its possible.
>>
>> --
>> - Mark
>>
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Thomas Becker wrote:
>>> Tests run on tmpfs:
>>> config: impl=Sepa
guess, based on
> the 2.9 new api profiling, is that your queries may not be agreeing with
> some of the changes somehow. Along with the profiling, can you fill us
> in on the query types you are using as well? (eg qualities)
>
> And grab invocations if its possible.
>
--
Thomas B
IndexSearcher.search was called only
> once.
>
> Uwe
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
--
Thomas Becker
Senior JEE Deve
t was only
> one search, you must have two segments and therefore no optimized index for
> this to be correct?
>
> Uwe
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> Fo
You use Lucene 2.9 is there a way to do this with Lucene 2.4.1 because I
can't find e.g. the "PayloadEncoder" or do I have to wait for the release?
Regards Thomas
You might want to ask on mahout-user, but I'm guessing Ted didn't mean
a new field for every item-item,
getTermFreqVector().
I do not require the term frequency within a document.
Thanks,
Thomas
HashMap termDocCount = new HashMap();
TermQuery tagQuery = new TermQuery(tagTerm);
TopDocs docs = searcher.search(tagQuery, numDocs);
for (int i=0 ; i public void map(String term, int frequency
while to compute the document,tag probabilities.
Thanks,
Thomas
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to compute the counts of terms of the documents return
be
careful. Load on the DB Server will surely increase.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Thomas
Paul Taylor wrote:
> I'm building a lucene index from a database, creating 1 about 1 million
> documents, unsuprisingly this takes quite a long time.
> I do this by sending a query to the db o
Hi,
I often get a FileNotFoundException when my single IndexWriter commits while
the IndexReader also tries to read. My application is multithreaded (Tomcat
uses the business APIs); I firstly thought the read/write access was
thread-safe but I probably forget something.
Please help me to unde
xWriter is committing) is perfectly fine. The reader
searches the point-in-time snapshot of the index as of when it was
opened.
But: what filesystem are you using? NFS presents challenges, for example.
Mike
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:35 AM, legrand thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I often get a Fi
McCandless a
écrit :
De: Michael McCandless
Objet: Re: Concurrent access IndexReader / IndexWriter - FileNotFoundException
À: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Samedi 9 Janvier 2010, 14h51
Can you post the full FNFE stack trace?
Mike
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:35 AM, legrand thomas wrote:
>
ginal questions...: commit/read does not require any
external synchronization or locking. You should generally keep your
IW open indefinitely and just periodically commit and/or get a new
reader (IndexWriter.getReader()) as needed.
Mike
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:06 AM, legrand thomas
wrote:
>
&g
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Med venlig hilsen
Thomas Guttesen
;
( or http://tinyurl.com/yjr45ut )
The mail is about a lucene index{reader|writer} on top of cassandra and
whether sth. like this could also be done with hbase.
Best regards,
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/03/egit-released
http://aniszczyk.org/2010/03/22/the-start-of-an-adventure-egitjgit-0-7-1/
Maybe, one day, some apache / hadoop projects will use GIT... :-)
(Yes, I know git.apache.org.)
Best regards,
Thomas Koch, http://www.ko
like the page or the chapter, where
the relevant information is.
As anyone have similar requirements? Which of these tools
are the best to fit my requirements?
Thanks for your help
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
You can extend the DefaultAnalyzer.
The only thing you have to do, is to rewrite the method tokenStream like
this:
/** Constructs a [EMAIL PROTECTED] StandardTokenizer} filtered by a [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
StandardFilter}, a [EMAIL PROTECTED] LowerCaseFilter} and a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
StopFilter}.
Hi,
I have few Indexes with the same structure.
I'm using MultiSearcher to search into those indexes and when I try to
sort the result by field the result is sort by field and by index (we
have all results from index1 and then index2,...) but I would like to
have the result sorted on the all result
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 November 2007 13:22
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting with MultiSearcher
Any other info or code snippets? I sort on multisearchers all the time
and have never seen that behavior.
- Mark (sorting on multisearchers since Lucene 1.4 )
WATHELET Thomas w
Dear all,
I'm trying to sort query results using a date criteria. My dates are stored as
"long" in the database (I cannot change this) and indexed as untokenized. The
sorted resuIts I get aren't consistent. This problem does not occur if the
number are "smaller".
Am I doing something wrong ? I
iddle.
Any body can help me thank's
Thomas WATHELET
Development Team
Tel.: (+352) 4300 24752
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<>
file.
It contains the following files.
master:/home/thomas/keywordsearch/etc # ls
/usr/local/jboss-3.2.7/server/default/conf/index/
.. _2.cfs segments.gen segments_9
I have checked the index using luke and it is good. In addition it works
on Windows.
Can anybody tell me why it is se
e.org
Betreff: Re: lucene can't find segments file
It seems likely you are using an older version of Lucene to access an index
created by a newer version of Lucene?
Mike
Hoelzl, Thomas wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have some problems running my lucene application on linux (suse).
>
> l
et something special to my search query?
I need help...
Thanks in advence.
Thomas WATHELET
Development Team
Tel.: (+352) 4300 24752
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<>
Dear all,
I'm a recent Lucene user and I'm looking for the best way to perform searches
over long titles (ad titles on a website).
For example, if the following documents exist:
- TITLE, "Fender telecaster"
- TITLE, "Land rover defender"
- TITLE, "I sale a wonderful fender st
; c).
Probably the problem is with this accents..
You can check this if you adapt the method tokenStream()
in the BrazilianAnalzyer by including the ISOLatin1AccentFilter
in the filter chain.
Thomas
Vinicius Carvalho said the following on 03/06/08 20:51:
Hello there! I'm indexing documents u
ardQuery with the term "pretty*car". I also want to
get this document when searching for "pretty*sale*". How should I do ? Is it
really possible ?
I use lucene 2.3.1.
Thanks in advance,
Thomas Legrand
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
