I suggest to find the root cause and then decide about the release. Tomorrow I will spent the whole working day on the issue if no prio1 pops up.
Sadly I've to leave early today, since I'm moving to a new flat... :( Uwe Schindler wrote: > How should we proceed? Stop the final artifact build and voting or proceed > with the release of 2.9? We waited so long and for most people it is faster > than slower! > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 6:23 PM >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: lucene 2.9.0RC4 slower than 2.4.1? >> >> bq. I'll do some profiling now again and let you know the results. >> >> Great - it will be interesting to see the results. My guess, based on >> the 2.9 new api profiling, is that your queries may not be agreeing with >> some of the changes somehow. Along with the profiling, can you fill us >> in on the query types you are using as well? (eg qualities) >> >> And grab invocations if its possible. >> >> -- >> - Mark >> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> >> >> Thomas Becker wrote: >>> Tests run on tmpfs: >>> config: impl=SeparateFile serial=false nThreads=4 iterations=100 >> bufsize=1024 >>> poolsize=2 filelen=18920301 >>> answer=850258539, ms=8090, MB/sec=935.4907787391842 >>> config: impl=ChannelFile serial=false nThreads=4 iterations=100 >> bufsize=1024 >>> poolsize=2 filelen=18920301 >>> answer=850258903, ms=39444, MB/sec=191.8700030422878 >>> config: impl=ChannelPread serial=false nThreads=4 iterations=100 >> bufsize=1024 >>> poolsize=2 filelen=18920301 >>> answer=850258903, ms=8504, MB/sec=889.9483066792098 >>> config: impl=PooledPread serial=false nThreads=4 iterations=100 >> bufsize=1024 >>> poolsize=2 filelen=18920301 >>> answer=850258903, ms=9585, MB/sec=789.5795931142409 >>> >>> I did run some tests now with SimpleFSDirectory and MMapDirectory. Both >> are >>> faster than NIOFS and the response times improved. But it's still slower >> than 2.4. >>> I'll do some profiling now again and let you know the results. >>> >>> Thanks again for all the great support to all who've answered. >>> >>> >>> Mark Miller wrote: >>> >>>> Can you run the following test on your RAMDISK? >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/FileReadTest.java >>>> >>>> I've taken it from the following issue (in which NIOFSDirectory was >>>> developed): >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753 >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Thomas Becker Senior JEE Developer net mobile AG Zollhof 17 40221 Düsseldorf GERMANY Phone: +49 211 97020-195 Fax: +49 211 97020-949 Mobile: +49 173 5146567 (private) E-Mail: mailto:thomas.bec...@net-m.de Internet: http://www.net-m.de Registergericht: Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 48022 Vorstand: Theodor Niehues (Vorsitzender), Frank Hartmann, Kai Markus Kulas, Dieter Plassmann Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Dr. Michael Briem --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
