Hi, i think you will use MultiSearcher and create a field and Value array
for that, that will solve your problem..
thanks
On 2/25/07, ruchi thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am new to Lucene.
I have a document with 3 fields - name,subject,rollno
I want to search on the 2 field name
Le dimanche 25 février 2007 12:35, Laxmilal Menaria a écrit :
> Hi, i think you will use MultiSearcher and create a field and Value array
> for that, that will solve your problem..
I don't know what was your issue Laxmilal, but Ruchika just need a simple
query : "+name:bob +subject:maths".
Nicol
25 feb 2007 kl. 06.04 skrev Mohammad Norouzi:
still I dont know ehrthrt the reader is important for Hits or
Searcher?
consider I passed a hits to my ResultSet, now, if I close searcher,
will the
Reader get closed? or another vague thing is can a Reader work thread
safely for every Searcher
I am a bit confused about what you are asking. Why do you need the
Searcher to time out? That code should release your searchers at the
appropriate times...when the index has been modified. The way that I use
it is to make a synchronized map that keeps around an index accessor for
each index th
Hi
actually I dont have any writer or writing reader. I just have reader. when
a reader is created by the user because the document returned by hits is
very much, for example 20,000 so I display the result page by page. whenever
user click to next page the hits will use the reader to load next 20
If you never modify your index you should never need to close your
reader (or searcher). Doing so would just slow you down.
Mohammad Norouzi wrote:
Hi
actually I dont have any writer or writing reader. I just have reader.
when
a reader is created by the user because the document returned by h
Yes, I'm pretty sure you have to index the field (UN_TOKENIZED) to be able
to fetch it with TermDocs/TermEnum! The loop I posted works like this
for each term in the index for the field
if this is one I want to update
use a TermDocs to get to that document and operate on it.
But
so, you mean, I open one reader for each session (each user) and never close
it until the session has expired? if I do this, is that affect the
performance?
On 2/25/07, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you never modify your index you should never need to close your
reader (or searcher)
Le dimanche 25 février 2007 16:55, Mohammad Norouzi a écrit :
> so, you mean, I open one reader for each session (each user) and never
> close it until the session has expired? if I do this, is that affect the
> performance?
The searcher/reader is a view on the index. And each time you open a new
In certain cases, I use a modified QueryParser which does not allow "field:"
syntax. While testing variants of Prefix and Wildcard Query, I came across an
oddity with getPrefixQuery(). The standard getPrefixQuery() (2.1) is given
termStr without the trailing *, so the check
if (!allowLeading
Hello,
As you probably know, the HitCollector-based search API is not meant to work
remotely, because it will generate a RPC-callback for every non-zero score.
There is another problem with MultiSearcher-HitCollector-based search which
knows nothing about mix HitCollector based searches (not to
However, see Wiki HowToContribute: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-
lucene/HowToContribute if you wish to donate your code.
-Grant
On Feb 25, 2007, at 6:56 PM, oramas martín wrote:
Hello,
As you probably know, the HitCollector-based search API is not
meant to work
remotely, because it will g
OK I'm not sure I understand your answer. I thought TermEnum gave you
all the terms in an index, not from a search result.
Let me clarify what I need. I'm looking for a way to find out all the
values of the FIELD_FILTER_LETTER field for any given search.
INDEX TIME: (done for each indexed
OK, I was thinking you were wondering how to get only the set of letters you
wanted the user to be able to choose from
You're right, the TermEnum/TermDocs tell you all of the terms in an index,
not really useful for your problem as I understand it now
How many documents do you have in y
Hi Erick
thank you and sorry for taking long my reply. I am involving in a project.
I was thinking of your idea about storing all tables in the same field. it
seems to me a good idea, but some vague issues.
first, how to create a lucene's document. did you mean, storing all tables
by joining all
15 matches
Mail list logo