Hi actually I dont have any writer or writing reader. I just have reader. when a reader is created by the user because the document returned by hits is very much, for example 20,000 so I display the result page by page. whenever user click to next page the hits will use the reader to load next 20 records, besides, I dont have one directory, there are more than one directory and index on the server and each user may request for one of them. the problem is, a user may close his browser window and the reader will stay open becasue I cant detect it. and either if his session expires my destroy method will be called and searcher will close but in the cached searcher i can not detect which one is closed and ready it for next user. if the searcher had a isClosed() method it was easy to determine but unfortunately it's has'nt
any idea? thanks again On 2/25/07, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am a bit confused about what you are asking. Why do you need the Searcher to time out? That code should release your searchers at the appropriate times...when the index has been modified. The way that I use it is to make a synchronized map that keeps around an index accessor for each index that I open...from there the code should do the rest...when a writer or a writing reader is released the code waits for all searchers to be released and then clears the cache of searchers and new searchers are created when requested until another writer or writing reader is released... Mohammad Norouzi wrote: > Thank you Mark for your useful help. the code you introduce was very > helpful > for me > > but my only question is that I need to place an idle time for each open > searcher, so if it exceed the specific time then release that searcher > and > get ready for another thread. > > how can I put such this feature, I was thinking of a timeout listener, > but > dont know where tu put it. I have a SingleSearcher that wraps lucene's > Searcher and it returns an ResultSet in which I put a Hits object. do > I have > to put the time in my ResultSet or my SingleSeacher? > > still I dont know ehrthrt the reader is important for Hits or Searcher? > consider I passed a hits to my ResultSet, now, if I close searcher, > will the > Reader get closed? or another vague thing is can a Reader work thread > safely for every Searcher with differenet queries? > > Thank you very much again. > > On 2/22/07, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I would not do this from scratch...if you are interested in Solr go that >> route else I would build off >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390 >> >> - Mark >> >> Mohammad Norouzi wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > I am going to build a Searcher pooling. if any one has experience on >> > this, I >> > would be glad to hear his/her recommendation and suggestion. I want to >> > know >> > what issues I should be apply. considering I am going to use this on a >> > web >> > application with many user sessions. >> > >> > thank you very much in advance. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Regards, Mohammad
