Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

gt;>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-09-17 at 1.13.07 AM.png][image: >>>>>>>>> Screenshot 2024-09-17 at 1.12.01 AM.png] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 1:00 AM Adrien Grand >>>>>>>>> wro

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

t;> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Rui, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We actually released a change that should make MaxScoreBulkScorer >>>>>>>>> faster on dense disjunctions in 9.8: >>>

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

;>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Rui, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We actually released a change that should make MaxScoreBulkScorer >>>>>>>> faster on dense disjunctions in 9.8: >&

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

ns in 9.8: >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12444. Your benchmark case is >>>>>>> quite specific though as all clauses match all docs and produce constant >>>>>>> scores, so I would expect the scorer to quickly realize th

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

se is >>>>>> quite specific though as all clauses match all docs and produce constant >>>>>> scores, so I would expect the scorer to quickly realize that it can skip >>>>>> all documents once it's scored the first k docs. This makes me wonder if >>&g

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

t;>>> it >>>>> bottleneck on skipping blocks of documents rather than on scoring them. >>>>> Would you be able to share your whole flame graph, it looks like it may be >>>>> truncated a the top? >>>>> >>>>> On

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

g them. >>>> Would you be able to share your whole flame graph, it looks like it may be >>>> truncated a the top? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 10:01 PM Rui Wu wrote: >>>> >>>>> Correction: The index has 3.6 million docum

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

t;>> bottleneck on skipping blocks of documents rather than on scoring them. >>> Would you be able to share your whole flame graph, it looks like it may be >>> truncated a the top? >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 10:01 PM Rui Wu wrote: >>> >>&g

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

than on scoring them. Would you be able to share your whole flame >> graph, it looks like it may be truncated a the top? >> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 10:01 PM Rui Wu wrote: >> >>> Correction: The index has 3.6 million documents. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 1

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

lame > graph, it looks like it may be truncated a the top? > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 10:01 PM Rui Wu wrote: > >> Correction: The index has 3.6 million documents. >> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 1:00 PM Rui Wu wrote: >> >>> Dear experts, >>> &g

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

24 at 10:01 PM Rui Wu wrote: > Correction: The index has 3.6 million documents. > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 1:00 PM Rui Wu wrote: > >> Dear experts, >> >> In our Mongodb Atlas Search performance regression test between Lucene >> 9.7 and Lucene 9.11, we dete

Re: MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

Correction: The index has 3.6 million documents. On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 1:00 PM Rui Wu wrote: > Dear experts, > > In our Mongodb Atlas Search performance regression test between Lucene 9.7 > and Lucene 9.11, we detect a 43% latency regression in this query shape: > 12 SHOULD c

MaxScoreBulkScorer increased latency for a extreme test case (many SHOULD and each SHOULD clause matches all docs)

Dear experts, In our Mongodb Atlas Search performance regression test between Lucene 9.7 and Lucene 9.11, we detect a 43% latency regression in this query shape: 12 SHOULD clause, and each clause matches all of the documents. Each should clause is wrapped in ConstantScoreQuery. The index has 3.6

Re: Multi-Value query test

nt to show the authors that are in the query also: Doc1 - Patrick Doc1 - Patrick, Michael So, I need to test each author value if is valid for the same query used for the resultSet. Il giorno gio 23 giu 2022 alle ore 08:08 Michael Wechner < michael.wech...@wyona.com> ha scritto: > Maybe

Multi-Value Query Test

How to test if a value in a multi-value field matches a specific query? Example of the problem: I've created a query to return all documents of some specific authors. The authors field contains multi-value sorted set. When showing the result, I want to show only the name of the authors spec

Re: Multi-Value query test

Maybe I misunderstand the problem, but why don't you decouple showing the results from the results of the query? Am 23.06.22 um 14:03 schrieb Patrick Bernardina: How to test if a value in a multi-value field matches a specific query? Example of the problem: I've created a query to

Multi-Value query test

How to test if a value in a multi-value field matches a specific query? Example of the problem: I've created a query to return all documents of some specific authors. The authors field contains multi-value sorted set. When showing the result, I want to show only the name of the authors spec

Re: test

Yes, please. Welcome. Best regards From: Claude Lepere Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 1:32 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: test Am I subscribed, please? Claude Lepère claudelep...@gmail.com <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.avg.com/em

test

Am I subscribed, please? Claude Lepère claudelep...@gmail.com Virus-free. www.avg.com

Re: lucene execute ./gradlew precommit and ./gradlew test failed

Your files have crlf line endings - your git is set up to convert files to Windows convention and this isn't supported by Lucene. You have to set git to clone exactly the same binary content as present in the repository, otherwise checksums won't match (this is intentional). You can always compare

Re: lucene execute ./gradlew precommit and ./gradlew test failed

What do these two commands say? git config autocrlf git config --global autocrlf Also, can you zip and send me those two offending files from your local checkout (dawid.we...@gmail.com)? Dawid On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:09 AM wuda wrote: > I hava clone a completely new branch "main", and the o

Re: lucene execute ./gradlew precommit and ./gradlew test failed

I'm sorry, I was out of office. I can't see that attachment you posted. If it's still a problem, can you copy-paste what you see on the console once you issue "git status"? Dawid On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 1:07 PM Da Wu wrote: > > I have executed like this. > > Dawid Weiss 于2021年8月2日周一 下午9:07写道： >>

Re: lucene execute ./gradlew precommit and ./gradlew test failed

I have executed like this. [image: 1628075031(1).png] Dawid Weiss 于2021年8月2日周一 下午9:07写道： > What does "git status" say? The hashes of generated files are not what > they're supposed to be - either something has changed them or you have > a git configuration that replaces something on the fly (lin

Re: lucene execute ./gradlew precommit and ./gradlew test failed

What does "git status" say? The hashes of generated files are not what they're supposed to be - either something has changed them or you have a git configuration that replaces something on the fly (line endings, most likely). Dawid On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 9:55 AM Da Wu wrote: > > i want to contr

lucene execute ./gradlew precommit and ./gradlew test failed

i want to contribute to lucene, and read How to Contribute , when i execute ./gradlew precommit, it failed, output is: Starting a Gradle Daemon, 1 incompatible Daemon could not be reused, use --status for details > Task :lucene:backward-codecs:gen

lucene 4.10.3 test comparison benchmarks

Hello Can point me someone lucene test comparison with similar fulltext search solution like : { oracle text query xapian terrier sql serve full text mysql full text } I found some tests comparison but for lucene 3.x instead of 4.x Best Regards,

Test,test,test, please ignore

Test west

Re: Sample Data to Test Lucene

hroniclingamerica.loc.gov/ocr/. Don't > know how well its error rates match yours... > > -Original Message- > From: Deniz Atak [mailto:deniza...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:43 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Sample Data to Test Luc

RE: Sample Data to Test Lucene

looks potentially useful: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/ocr/. Don't know how well its error rates match yours... -Original Message- From: Deniz Atak [mailto:deniza...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:43 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Sample Data to Test

Sample Data to Test Lucene

Hi, we are new to Lucene. We would like to use Lucene for our archive project. In this project we have to get some images of documents, get text out of them via OCR and index them using Lucene. In order to see if Lucene is suitable for our project we need to test Lucene with sample data. But we

RE: Unit test help

Thanks for the response! Many of the tests ran fine and those were creating subfolders in the temp dir. I got the unit tests all passing in eclipse by changing the eclipse text encoding of the test project from the default (Cp1252) to UTF-8. To get testLuceneConstantVersion to pass, I had to

RE: Unit test help

Hi, keep in mind, that the Lucene Test Framework inserts a SecurityManager into the JVM, so tests cannot write outside their working directory or open ports to the internet and do other crazy stuff. This is to ensure, tests don't overwrite any file in the distribution and that a failing/

Unit test help

my head against this one failure for a few hours. It happens from the command line ("ant test"), but not eclipse. I've narrowed it down using printf debugging. I am using the same random seed in both cases, though I've run it a lot without specifying the seed and I always f

Re: TestGrouping.Java seems to combine multiple tests into one huge test

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote: > Sine my objective is to undersdand BlockGroupingCollector, I thought I > would extract a test for BlockGroupingCollector, maybe in another file as > Robert suggested. I think that makes sense! > I was looking at testRandom

Re: TestGrouping.Java seems to combine multiple tests into one huge test

Sine my objective is to undersdand BlockGroupingCollector, I thought I would extract a test for BlockGroupingCollector, maybe in another file as Robert suggested. I was looking at testRandom because that is where BlockGroupingCollector is tested, but it looks to me like some trickery is involved

Re: TestGrouping.Java seems to combine multiple tests into one huge test

Thanks Mike and Robert, >>Refactoring this test would be fantastic, but I wouldn't want to take it on :) >>Maybe an easier step would be to rename this test something like TestRandomGrouping, and add some brand new very simple-easy-to-understand tests to a new file(s). I o

Re: TestGrouping.Java seems to combine multiple tests into one huge test

+1 to somehow refactor this scary test to make it more understandable! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to understand BlockGroupingCollector. I thought I would start > by running

Re: TestGrouping.Java seems to combine multiple tests into one huge test

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Tom Burton-West wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to understand BlockGroupingCollector. I thought I would start > by running the tests in the debugger. However the only test I can find is > > lucene/grouping/src/test/org/apache

TestGrouping.Java seems to combine multiple tests into one huge test

Hello, I'm trying to understand BlockGroupingCollector. I thought I would start by running the tests in the debugger. However the only test I can find is lucene/grouping/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/TestGrouping.java In TestGrouping.java, in the second test, "test

test LA Times with pruning package

91 3663309 37860694 5 40,290 4139019 10 36,489 4485072 15 34,288 4743474 50 x 69 11990022 Thanks in advance, Best Regards ZP -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/test-LA-Times-with-pruning-pa

Re: how to do remote debug on benchmark test or whatever test?

hao, this is a java question not a lucene question. Here's a short answer: Those options are to be fed to the java command. Running on the command-line is where you could put them. Running in IDEs there is generally such a feature ready, or the possibility to connect to the socket address. pau

how to do remote debug on benchmark test or whatever test?

Which file should i go and set: -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8886,server=y,suspend=y ? thanks! hao - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h.

test

I've been trying to respond to a user's email all day, but received "mail delivery" errors from Gmail regarding java-user@. Trying a fresh new email to see if it goes through. Sorry for the spam. Shai

Re: Lucene test documents (TREC)

I think it depends on the organization that provides the collections, see: http://trec.nist.gov/data/docs_eng.html Best Erick On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Sara naznazi wrote: > hi > I want to know is TREC documents (a test collection) free or not? Is there > any other collection

Lucene test documents (TREC)

hi I want to know is TREC documents (a test collection) free or not? Is there any other collection like TREC to do our test? Is there any one to use this collection? thanks

Re: IndexWriter.optimize not using it breaks my test case :(

that optimize does do is clear out deleted documents. Could that be relevant to your test failure? If so, there is an expungeDeletes() method you could maybe use instead. -- Ian. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079 wrote: > I read that in a lot of cases IndexWriter.optimi

IndexWriter.optimize not using it breaks my test case :(

I read that in a lot of cases IndexWriter.optimize does not have to be called. I then deleted it and my junit test case broke because results were coming back in the query that were not supposed to be coming back :(. I think everything is single tested. Maybe I should write a more raw junit

RE: Link to nightly build test reports on main Lucene site needs updating

Thanks for fixing++ Tom -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 6:05 AM To: d...@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com; java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Link to nightly build test reports on main Lucene site needs

Re: Link to nightly build test reports on main Lucene site needs updating

>> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com] >> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 9:42 PM >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Cc: d...@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Link to nightly build test reports on main Lucene site needs >> updating >

RE: Link to nightly build test reports on main Lucene site needs updating

.org > Cc: d...@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Link to nightly build test reports on main Lucene site needs > updating > > thanks tom, > I cced dev@l.a.o > > simon > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Burton-West, Tom > wrote: > > Hello, > > >

Re: Link to nightly build test reports on main Lucene site needs updating

l#Nightly > > > The links  to the Clover Test Coverage Reports  point to > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Lucene/job/Lucene-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/clover/ >  but apparently hudson.zones.apache.org is no longer being used.  I think > the link should point to somewh

Link to nightly build test reports on main Lucene site needs updating

Hello, I went to look at the "Hudson nightly builds" and tried to follow the link from the main Lucene page http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/developer-resources.html#Nightly The links to the Clover Test Coverage Reports point to http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Lucene/

Re: Test File locks

> path you are using on both machines?  and that same path works on one > machine but not the other? > > > : Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:43:27 -0700 > : From: Spencer Tickner > : Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > : To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > : Subject: Test Fil

Re: Test File locks

cene.apache.org : Subject: Test File locks : : Hi Everyone, : : Thanks in advance for any help. : : I've been building lucene index to a MS Windows Server 2003 test : environment with no problem. When attempting to build the same index : onto a Windows Server 2008 machine I get the following error

Re: Test File locks

. On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Spencer Tickner wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > I've been building lucene index to a MS Windows Server 2003 test > environment with no problem. When attempting to build the same index > onto a Windows Ser

Test File locks

Hi Everyone, Thanks in advance for any help. I've been building lucene index to a MS Windows Server 2003 test environment with no problem. When attempting to build the same index onto a Windows Server 2008 machine I get the following error: Cannot create directory: \\whatever\index

Re: Can you use reduced sized test indexes to predict performance gains for a larger index?

erience with large indexes (about 200-300GB) , we found most of > our bottlenecks involved disk I/O. We found that if our experimental > indexes were too small, that much of the index could fit in cache, and so > our test results were not applicable to our larger indexes. On the other &g

Re: Can you use reduced sized test indexes to predict performance gains for a larger index?

Hi Chris, In our experience with large indexes (about 200-300GB) , we found most of our bottlenecks involved disk I/O. We found that if our experimental indexes were too small, that much of the index could fit in cache, and so our test results were not applicable to our larger indexes. On

Can you use reduced sized test indexes to predict performance gains for a larger index?

t 2-3 weeks to build, so if I have to rebuild the entire index in order to test each potential improvement, then I'm going to be waiting around a lot. One option is to test potential performance improvements by building indexes not for the full dataset, but rather for, say, a 1% sample of the fu

RE: here a small test case problem:lucene did not delete old index file after optimize method called

th.LIMITED);    writer.setMergeFactor(16);      Thread writeThread = new Thread(new Runnable() {     @Override     public void run() { // write test data    

Re: How to test if an IndexReader is still open?

: I figured it might be less expensive if search() (I have extended : IndexSearcher) were to check that the underlying IndexReader is still if you're extending IndexSearcher anyway you can override the close() method to update a boolean and then add your own isClosed() method. : open - and re

How to test if an IndexReader is still open?

Hi, In an attempt to balance searching efficiency against the number of open file descriptors on my system, I cache IndexSearchers with a "last used" timestamp. A background cache manager thread then periodically checks the cache for any that haven't been used in a while and removes them from

Re: Lucene-Core test failures

. It seems these modified null bytes are not being retrieved properly. This failure is of particular interest to me because I am getting a similar failure in the specs for the implementation of IndexInput I am working on for the App Engine Datastore. I was wondering if this test failure is somet

Lucene-Core test failures

modified null bytes are not being retrieved properly. This failure is of particular interest to me because I am getting a similar failure in the specs for the implementation of IndexInput I am working on for the App Engine Datastore. I was wondering if this test failure is something to be

Re: Lucene problem:No document handler defined for the name "test"

; simon > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Pablo Mosquera > Saenz wrote: > > Hi, I have downloaded the springmodule for lucene, version 0.9 and tried > to > > test the sample > > > > I have used the lucene core library 2.4.1 > > > > The first problem I

Re: Lucene problem:No document handler defined for the name "test"

for lucene, version 0.9 and tried to > test the sample > > I have used the lucene core library 2.4.1 > > The first problem I found is that with the initial configuration > >     class="org.springmodules.lucene.search.factory.SimpleSearcherFactory"> >         &g

Lucene problem:No document handler defined for the name "test"

Hi, I have downloaded the springmodule for lucene, version 0.9 and tried to test the sample I have used the lucene core library 2.4.1 The first problem I found is that with the initial configuration With SingleSearcherFactory, in the startup I have an error because

Re: test

Can you provide more details? EG a full exception? What was the app doing (indexing, searching, both)? Mike On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Antony Joseph wrote: > Hi, > > In a long running process Lucene get crashed in my application, Is there any > way to diagnose or how can I  turn on debug

RE: test

Hi, In a long running process Lucene get crashed in my application, Is there any way to diagnose or how can I turn on debug logging / trace logging for Lucene? Thanks Antony -- DigitalGlue, India - To unsu

test

hi -- DigitalGlue, India

Re: Search Test file

Hi Test case passing now. Thanks for your help. I kind of thought it was probably something I was doing wrong! Cheers Amin On 4 Jan 2009, at 16:59, Grant Ingersoll wrote: On Jan 4, 2009, at 2:49 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote: Hi Grant Thank you for looking at the test case. I

Re: Search Test file

On Jan 4, 2009, at 2:49 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote: Hi Grant Thank you for looking at the test case. I have updated the IndexWriter to use UNLIMITED for MaxFieldLength. I tried using Integer.MAX_VALUE for Also, TopDocs topDocs = multiSearcher.search(query

Re: Search Test file

hy "amin" token is being stored as "indexed.amin". Thanks again for all the help. Cheers Amin On 4 Jan 2009, at 02:23, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Begin forwarded message: From: Grant Ingersoll Date: January 3, 2009 8:19:14 PM EST To: java-...@lucene.apache.org Subj

Re: Re: Re: Search Test file

AUTOMATIC REPLY LUX is closed until 5th January 2009 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Re: Search Test file

AUTOMATIC REPLY LUX is closed until 5th January 2009 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Search Test file

Hi Grant Thank you for looking at the test case. I have updated the IndexWriter to use UNLIMITED for MaxFieldLength. I tried using Integer.MAX_VALUE for Also, TopDocs topDocs = multiSearcher.search(query, BooleanQuery.getMaxClauseCount()); strikes me as really odd. Why are you

Fwd: Search Test file

Begin forwarded message: From: Grant Ingersoll Date: January 3, 2009 8:19:14 PM EST To: java-...@lucene.apache.org Subject: Fwd: Search Test file Reply-To: java-...@lucene.apache.org Hi Amin, I see a couple of issues with your program below, and one that is the cause of the problem of

Re: Test. Please ignore that. Fwd: How to send mail to java user

+1. I've got On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Raymond Balmès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I'm getting plenty of message but do you receive mine... please someone > give > me reply > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Leonid Maslov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message --

Re: Test. Please ignore that. Fwd: How to send mail to java user

I'm getting plenty of message but do you receive mine... please someone give me reply On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Leonid Maslov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Sankari Palanisamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:32 PM > Subject:

Test. Please ignore that. Fwd: How to send mail to java user

-- Forwarded message -- From: Sankari Palanisamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:32 PM Subject: Re: How to send mail to java user To: Leonid Maslov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, Thanks for u'r response.. Still i am getting following message Further what to do. Thank

test

test - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

Very grateful for Toke Eskildsen of attention my questions. > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:59:27 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: > The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test> To: > java-user@lucene.apache.org> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:56 +0800

RE: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:56 +0800, lutan wrote: > Yes ,I have test again with same entironment but to use singleton > IndexSearcher.the performance has increased. there 100 concurrent > user request use different keyword ,and get 60 TPS(2 TPS before). > and now the bottleneck seem t

RE: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

Thanks for you replay!> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:19:46 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 00:17 +0800, lutan wrote:> > In my test case , I st

RE: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 00:17 +0800, lutan wrote: > In my test case , I start loadrunner jsut test for 5 minute,and the response > growth slowly.the TPS(transactions per second) seems stoped at 10 finally. That's without reusing the searcher, right? In that case the increased r

RE: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

Thanks for the reply! In my test case , I start loadrunner jsut test for 5 minute,and the response growth slowly.the TPS(transactions per second) seems stoped at 10 finally. I will run a test for a longer time again. In addition,does lucene has bottleneck about the number of documents or

Re: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 21:11 +0800, lutan wrote: > [A lot of text with code and no newlines, making it very hard to read] In your test you're reusing the searcher. For each search your program performs, you will see faster response times, until the searcher is fully warmed. If your pr

The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

I have recently done some tests on lucene. I do not know whether the test results normal. hd entironment:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5110 @ 1.60GHz4GB ram sw entironment:centOS4.6+sun jdk 1.5+jboss+lucene2.3.2+je-analysis(a chinese analysis)there are 10 million+ documents which total about 3GB

Test

Test -- - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Dataset to test lucene

sumittyagi skrev: hi, i need a dataset having html pages to test my lucene programs... from where can i download it.. Is there a specific data set you are looking for or would any do? How about you download Wikipedia? karl

Dataset to test lucene

hi, i need a dataset having html pages to test my lucene programs... from where can i download it.. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dataset-to-test-lucene-tp16538139p16538139.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Chinese test resources wanted

Hi Guys, Do anyone who tests the Analyzers can give me some CJK test resources or advice me from where to obtain. Best Regards, Ivan Ivan Vasilev wrote: Hi Guys, We just implemented multi language support in our application. We tested it with some files which content is copy/pasted from

Chinese test resources wanted

Hi Guys, We just implemented multi language support in our application. We tested it with some files which content is copy/pasted from some Chinese sites and everything seems to work correctly, but we need to test it more thoroughly. Any suggestions from were to get some testing resources and

Re: Test my Lucene service

ROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Monday, January 8, 2007 11:59:24 PM Subject: Test my Lucene service Hi luceners, I don't have any question today. Simply I want to know how you test the efficiency of yours systems that works over Lucene. I think it will be a very interesting

Re: Test my Lucene service

Why test? LOL. just release your software and you'll find the answer, at least that is what I did:) www.megueii.com On 1/8/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In Lucene in Action we covered testing/monitoring performance with JUnitPerf: http://lucenebook.com/search?qu

Re: Test my Lucene service

.apache.org Sent: Monday, January 8, 2007 11:59:24 PM Subject: Test my Lucene service Hi luceners, I don't have any question today. Simply I want to know how you test the efficiency of yours systems that works over Lucene. I think it will be a very interesting for all newbie (like me) in Luce

Re: Test my Lucene service

ex is structured, the complexity of your queries, how you sort, etc Erick On 1/8/07, Dan Wiggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi luceners, I don't have any question today. Simply I want to know how you test the efficiency of yours systems that works over Lucene. I think it will be a very

Test my Lucene service

Hi luceners, I don't have any question today. Simply I want to know how you test the efficiency of yours systems that works over Lucene. I think it will be a very interesting for all newbie (like me) in Lucene world some advices in this point. Thanks in advance.

Re: Test new query parser?

I have received a few inquires about my new query parser. I apologize for making that announcement a little premature. My current implementation only allows simple mixing of proximity queries with boolean queries...complex mixing would result in an incorrect search. A reply to my first email ma

Re: Test new query parser?

It is interesting to note that Lucene would also seem to suffer from bugs when using spans if you only have a single document in the index. At least with the NotSpanQuery, the spans could wrap around the document from end to beginning. This would be unexpected but would also go away if you add

  1   2   >