error. Encountered unkown character. We tried setting the string
> encoding to UTF 8 but it does not help.
>
> Can anyone please help. Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Chinese-Japanese-Korean-Indexing-i
pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Chinese-Japanese-Korean-Indexing-issue-Version-2.4-tp25388003p25388003.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Unfortunately, there's no concise summarization of the code to post.
As a follow-up to the situation, after throwing more RAM at the
problem (from 2GB to 10GB of process space) we no longer see OOM
errors and also no longer see the IndexWriter create thousands of
files; the OOM error did ap
Micah,
If you can post some of your code, it may be easier to identify the
problem you're experiencing.
-J
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Micah Jaffe wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the response! The (custom) searchers that are falling out of
> cache are indeed calling close on their IndexReader in f
Hi, thanks for the response! The (custom) searchers that are falling
out of cache are indeed calling close on their IndexReader in
finalize(); they are not calling close on themselves as that appears
to be a no-op when creating an IndexSearcher with a reader. The
searchers are just extend
Are you .close()ing your IndexReaders when they fall out of the MRU cache?
Seems like there are two problems... 1) why are you hitting OOMEs?
Seems likely you're just doing too much at once can you ask the
JRE to get you a heap dump when it hits OOME?
2) Why is IndexWriter creating zillions o
The Problem: periodically we see thousands of files get created from
an IndexWriter in a Java process in a very short period of time.
Since we started trying to track this, we saw an index go from ~25
files to over 200K files in about a half hour.
The Context: a hand-rolled, all-in-one Luc
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Michael Stoppelman
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've got an indexing issue I think other folks might be interested in
> > hearing about and I wanted to get feedback befo
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Michael Stoppelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got an indexing issue I think other folks might be interested in
> hearing about and I wanted to get feedback before I went ahead and
> implemented a new method.
>
&
Hi all,
I've got an indexing issue I think other folks might be interested in
hearing about and I wanted to get feedback before I went ahead and
implemented a new method.
Currently, the way we update indices is by sending individual delete/add
document requests to all our search
10 matches
Mail list logo
