Thanks Mark for the pointer!
-John
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> No, not a bug, certainly its the intended behavior (though the name is a
> bit tricky isn't it? I've actually thought about that in the past myself).
> If you check out the javadoc on Fieldable youll find:
>
No, not a bug, certainly its the intended behavior (though the name is a
bit tricky isn't it? I've actually thought about that in the past
myself). If you check out the javadoc on Fieldable youll find:
/** Expert:
*
* If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from postings for
this f
Thanks Mark!I don't think it is documented (at least the ones I've read),
should this be considered as a bug or ... ?
Thanks
-John
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Drops positions as well.
>
> - Mark
>
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2008, at 4:57 PM, "John Wang" wrote:
>
> Hi:
>> In
Drops positions as well.
- Mark
On Dec 18, 2008, at 4:57 PM, "John Wang" wrote:
Hi:
In lucene 2.4, when Field.omitTF() is called, payload is disabled as
well. Is this intentional? My understanding is payload is
independent from
the term frequencies.
Thanks
-John
